Dynomax Ultra Flo X mufflers?
#1
11 Second Truck Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Breaux Bridge, LA
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...5&autoview=sku
i tried a search but came up short.
is anyone running a set-up like this in place of the stock muffler location?
i think it would be an advantage for weight savings, from having two muffler and a x pipe.
thanks,
lance
i tried a search but came up short.
is anyone running a set-up like this in place of the stock muffler location?
i think it would be an advantage for weight savings, from having two muffler and a x pipe.
thanks,
lance
#3
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It wouldn't be as effective at the rear of the vehicle, if you can get it within a resonable distance it would probably be a good idea. Hopefully your talking about doing this to the truck not the F bod cus that would be damn near impossible to get under a f bod close enuff to the headers to be worthwhile.
#7
MASS seller approved
iTrader: (49)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I wouldn't advise running that muffler at the back of an f-body. Like others said, if it was on a truck, or a car where you could get it closer to the headers, then I would definately recommend it.
You want to keep the X close to the headers to see any sort of gain from it.
You want to keep the X close to the headers to see any sort of gain from it.