3" or 2.5" TD's?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 23, 2007 | 10:55 PM

#21

orangeapeel

ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™

iTrader: (18)

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 16,083

Likes: 4

From: Justin, TX

I love my 2.5's. Smaller pipe means it will touch less of the under carriage.

Mar 24, 2007 | 12:06 AM

#22

KurtRardin

TECH Addict

iTrader: (11)

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 2,148

Likes: 4

From: Gainesville, GA

That is one very good sounding car. It reminds me a lot of my big block. I think it was a 242 dur 110 cam. crane 292/292 .490/.510.

Your setup is over the axle isnt it?

Mar 24, 2007 | 01:17 AM

#23

Jakson

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (50)

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 643

Likes: 4

From: MN

If i didn't find these 3" Lane TDs for so cheap, i definatly would have gotten 2.5" if i had to do it over. These things scrape on quite a bit. Having a full car is definatly out of the Q now even on my stock height/sagging 120k 98 suspension.

Mar 24, 2007 | 02:33 AM

#24

KurtRardin

TECH Addict

iTrader: (11)

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 2,148

Likes: 4

From: Gainesville, GA

If i brought the X, the cats, and the mufflers, how much money would i be looking at in pipes and labor for a under axle TD (with flanges at the axle so i can take the tail pipes off)?

$250? high or low?

Reply Subscribe

Reply Share

First
Prev
2 / 2
Next
Last