Vic. Jr question
Vic. Jr question A while back I saw someone running the Vic. Jr intake with a throttle body, therefore keeping Fuel injection. Thing is, i thought these intake were only for carbed setups. Is it a different part#, or do you just put a tb on instead of a carb? also, what is the cost of one of these intakes, and how do they perform compared to both the LS6 and the FAST? Thanks for the help!
http://www.byunspeed.com/product_inf...872d07a0f81561
here you go, this is a start... and a search in here and in the FI section should answer most of your questions!
here you go, this is a start... and a search in here and in the FI section should answer most of your questions!
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by N4cer
Care to elaborate?
And like Hamrhead said, I would look into a FAST intake as it would be better for a N/A application.
Now for a bit of a contradiction...Im running a LS6 intake on my FI setup even though a carb style intake is supposed to give you better flow characteristics in a FI setup.
I sold my LS6 intake, and Im going with the Victor Jr w/ a FAST 4bbl TB. My car is FI, so I think it will flow better to all the cylinders. Plus it will look right at home in my Chevelle.
Ron
Ron
"low end" should never be a reason for not getting a single plane intake. 1. if your car is an auto, your 4000+ stall is going to completely eliminate "low end" 2. if you have a manual, you are going to be doing clutch dumps anyways, so no need to even account for it either. 3. i was told of a guy who lost 10rwt becuase of a single plane intake, but gained 20rwhp. well worth the trade off IMO expecialy for a cheaper intake.
"low end" should never be a reason for not getting a single plane intake. 1. if your car is an auto, your 4000+ stall is going to completely eliminate "low end" 2. if you have a manual, you are going to be doing clutch dumps anyways, so no need to even account for it either. 3. i was told of a guy who lost 10rwt becuase of a single plane intake, but gained 20rwhp. well worth the trade off IMO expecialy for a cheaper intake.
I would agree with this as long as you race the care occasionally...on the street you will notice the loss of low end torque though...
However, still not enough to sway me away from a carb style intake!
Did anyone see this thread? Nice picture of a victor jr with an elbow that's supposed to fit under a camaro hood:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-external-engine/836671-edelbrock-intake-design-torque.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-external-engine/836671-edelbrock-intake-design-torque.html
