My custom ported FAST 85/85 - *PICS!*
General knowledge is weak on a subject oriented Internet.
Its few and far between that you will find an accurate depiction of whats really going on without someone being biased or skewed in the favor of their shop or products.
Some of the most obvious dirty dealings are the dyno numbers that can be played with.
Are you going to be able to have any dyno numbers for this thing? I'm curious how much better it is than what I did for just a tad more money. And how it compares to a 90/90.
-J
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
If you already have a good epoxied and ported 78 mm TB (like a Mark Shaner piece or something similar) score a 78 unit cheap and just consider having it ported. Even at the prices I charge to do a very neat and thorough job your return on investment is still better than buying a larger 85 mm TB and cutting up the snout which might close the gap in half between the 78 and the 90 netting you 2-3 HP. For an extra few hundred you would see an additional gain of 10 RWHP and a similar bump in TQ (my ported FAST 78 set-up went 20 RWHP and 15 RWTQ stronger than my former LS6/78 set-up as I previously mentioned).
For grins I just whipped up this spreadsheet....prices and performance may vary slightly but I think the general point I am making would still be intact.
Manifold.............Avg Retail $$...........Typical Gain.........Cost/HP
Stk FAST 78.............700........................8....... ............. $87
Stk FAST 90 (w/ TB)..1200......................13................. ...$92
FAST 78 w/ 85 mm.....900.......................11............... .....$82
Ported FAST 78.........1200......................18........... .........$67
Ported FAST 90/90.....1700......................23............... .....$74
The key is to understand that the snout doesn't represent the largest restriction in the FAST hence the smaller gains when messing with it. Reshaping and reconfiguring the ports are where the larger gains in airflow and power can be unlocked....
Tony
I would like to see one more choice (if it's any differnt from what you allready have
Ported FAST 78.........1200......................18........... .........$67
ported 78mm w/ported stock 75mm TB.
? for the Guru I choose the 78mm since I have stock heads was told that the 90mm would make the bottom power soft however you do gain a little up top?
True or false
?2. was also informed that the 90mm is spesifically designed for a larger cubic motor than 346CID?
True or false.
? I purchased my 78mm allready ported (for stock heads) the seller said someone from New York area did the porting.
in you're professional opion how do'es port job look?
Lastly when I get ported heads would you recomend port matching to the heads.
Thanks
I'm thinking the above chart #s are w/ stoch heads since the FAST is orginally designed as a bolt on.
my observations of this port job is there was'nt much material removed, I'm thinking it's more of a smooth out than a actuale port
I'm also thinking that porting really means port matching to what ever it's bolted to.
Last edited by badmfkr; Nov 16, 2008 at 09:21 AM.
If the 85mm MAF and 85mm lid help like people claim, then you'd think the 85mm TB on ANY intake would also help power production.
Anybody run this combo?
TPIS had a 90mm version of the LS6 intake where an LS2 neck is installed onto the LS6 intake, but the mod costs a lot.
However, I have a home modified 85mm LS6 intake. In a thread named "Ported LS6 vs Ported Weiand....," or something like that, are the measured airflow results between the two.
EDIT: Just found it. The thread is called "My findings, Ported Weiand vs Ported LS6 intake.
Last edited by LS1-450; Nov 17, 2008 at 02:46 PM. Reason: Noted reference thread info.







