whats the point??? mabey im missing something
whats the point of havin the fast 90/90 w/ a stock maf and even a 85mm lid
or even if you have a 85 mm maf, you have a 90mm tb?
wouldnt it be restricted by the maf and lid?
you wouldnt put a 85mm lid n 85 mm maf on a 78mm intake n tb or the stock ones
i guess what im sayin is if i had a 78 mm lid n 78mm maf and 78mm tb/intake wouldnt that be a more matched setup?
i could see people going s/d tune the fast 90/90 but....
Your touching on a good point but in the end what is truely the flow potential is the intake manifold + the cyl heads together. That is the #1 combination would be concerned with.
Even though the intake track (lid, Maf, Bellow) is smaller then a larger TB and intake manifold, the manifold still holds a volume of air. Only when all avalible air is being sucked in and it cannot be replenished fast enough under WOT will the intake track be a true restriction.
Once the trottle is backed off the manifold can replenish itself.
There are companies trying to make larger components to met the increased size, running stock isnt going to negate the increase of a 90/90 set up. Ive seen many dyno's showing a improvement over stock. Bettering the intake track may further add to the increase.
whats the point of havin the fast 90/90 w/ a stock maf and even a 85mm lid
or even if you have a 85 mm maf, you have a 90mm tb?
wouldnt it be restricted by the maf and lid?
you wouldnt put a 85mm lid n 85 mm maf on a 78mm intake n tb or the stock ones
i guess what im sayin is if i had a 78 mm lid n 78mm maf and 78mm tb/intake wouldnt that be a more matched setup?
i could see people going s/d tune the fast 90/90 but....
thanks for clearing up my ?
is a series of "soft" drags and not a hard limit. You're
moving a compressible fluid, not a bowling ball. Every
hole you make bigger helps some. Some more than
others.


