Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ceramic MAC Mid Lengths/ORY

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 07:44 PM
  #21  
INMY01TA's Avatar
11 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,235
Likes: 2
From: Crofton Md.
Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
Umm...dyno graphs and common sense. Do you have Mac mids? If you do, I understand if you feel the need to pimp the product you've spent your money on, but honestly, there's no good reason to ever buy them. There are plenty of negatives on a stock f-body, and the more mods you add, the more negatives arise.
What power does your car make with your QTPs and what kind of dyno?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 07:46 PM
  #22  
Alt's Avatar
Alt
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: Hampstead, MD
Default

How about the fact that I am going to lay my car out? I have mids currently and I know I have enough clearance to lay the car on the ground and not have an issue. What about long tubes? That is my argument for mid length headers.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 08:04 PM
  #23  
gillbot's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
From: East Palestine, OH - USA
Default

Originally Posted by INMY01TA
Shorties are not comparible to mids. Mids make damn near close to long tubes, I've had both.
Amen!

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
Yes they are. Mids make around double what shorties do, longtubes can make around double what mids do. It's a pretty good comparison. Especially since the comparison was about FLOW, not SCAVENGING, so you took it out of context Shorties, mids and longtubes flow the same. Longtubes just scavenge the best.
From the lqatest swap I did going from mids to pacesetters, the gain on the car was 2hp and 3rwtq even after extensive tuning. Show me ONE instance of where they made double. That's right because it's made up.

Originally Posted by INMY01TA
Roll your eyes if you want, not even your super ultra high hp, merge collected QTPS are gonna make double the power Macs do.


There will always be MAC haters and then there will be those who see them as what they really are. A fine product that makes GOOD power. Are they the absolute best? NO but neither are the highly coveted QTP's or any other header out there. EVERY combo is different, you just need to find what works for your car and budget. Making a blaket statement saying they are garbage is laughable IMHO. Especially coming from someone who has ZERO knowledge of the product except what was read on the almighty internets.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 08:36 PM
  #24  
Hennytime's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
From: winter springs, fl
Default

Originally Posted by gillbot
Amen!



From the lqatest swap I did going from mids to pacesetters, the gain on the car was 2hp and 3rwtq even after extensive tuning. Show me ONE instance of where they made double. That's right because it's made up.





There will always be MAC haters and then there will be those who see them as what they really are. A fine product that makes GOOD power. Are they the absolute best? NO but neither are the highly coveted QTP's or any other header out there. EVERY combo is different, you just need to find what works for your car and budget. Making a blaket statement saying they are garbage is laughable IMHO. Especially coming from someone who has ZERO knowledge of the product except what was read on the almighty internets.

the mac savior to the rescue, thanks for the backup
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 09:49 PM
  #25  
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
Tech Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 3
From: Philly
Default

Originally Posted by INMY01TA
What power does your car make with your QTPs and what kind of dyno?
I'll let you know as soon as I'm out of class to get my car tuned.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 09:59 PM
  #26  
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
Tech Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 3
From: Philly
Default

Originally Posted by gillbot
From the lqatest swap I did going from mids to pacesetters, the gain on the car was 2hp and 3rwtq even after extensive tuning. Show me ONE instance of where they made double. That's right because it's made up.
Swap from Macs to Pacesetters made 2 rwhp/3 rwtq? Proof? Graph? Same dyno? Same day? Is that PEAK hp/tq? Because the advantage of longtubes over mids is UNDER THE CURVE power, not peak power. That's what the scavenging effect does. Macs suck for under-the-curve power.

I'd be curious to see your dyno graph, and I'd be curious to see what the gains were at 3000 rpms, not 6000 rpms.


https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/700678-results-qtp-hvmc-vs-pacesetters.html

Here we have a swap from Pacesetters to QTP's. We have 9 rwhp/7 wrtq peak gain and an 18 rwhp/31 rwqt gain at 3100 rpms. That's on a H/C car, but it shows the ridiculous amount of power lying on the table when you buy a cheaper longtube like Pacesetter. A high quality longtube like QTP, which has high velocity merge collectors, longer primaries and equal length primaries nets you gobs of horsepower under the curve and significant gains at peak.

And that's just a longtube to longtube swap!

Now, imagine what that will give you with mids? Say we take your unsupported, possibly fabricated 2 rwhp/3 rwtq number and take it as absolute evidence. A simple swap from Macs to QTP's with no other changes will net you 11 rwhp/10 rwqt PEAK.

Now, we'll take into consideration the 18 rwhp/31 rwtq number from a Pacesetter to QTP swap, no other changes. Now, since longtubes scavenge under the curve substantially better than mids, you're going to see MONSTEROUS gains of horsepower and torque under the curve from a Mac to QTP swap. If Pacesetter to QTP nets you 31 rwtq, going from Macs to QTP's can easily net you 40+rwtq at ~3000 rpms! Get your car tuned for it and the potential goes even HIGHER! We could be talking about a ~50 rwtq difference on an aggressive H/C setup!

That is INSANE the kind of power left on the table from Mac's! Again, there are a lot of "Mac haters" because they are pointless to buy.

Just think, if you didn't have Mac's, you would have been able to break that 400 rwhp mark and then some
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #27  
Hennytime's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
From: winter springs, fl
Default

thats a hell of a speculation youve got there sparky

no one is saying that mac trump lt's, but for the price, for a MILD setup, its just not worth it
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 11:27 PM
  #28  
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
Tech Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 3
From: Philly
Default

It's not a speculation, it's a fact. The only thing you can argue with is my ~50 rwtq estimate, and that simply can't be off by more than ~10 rwtq in the same conditions on the same dyno.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 12:04 AM
  #29  
INMY01TA's Avatar
11 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,235
Likes: 2
From: Crofton Md.
Default

Not convinced from one persons dyno but glad you like your headers Choco. I like mine even better. XS long tubes $299. My custom Y was free. Guessing your QTP header/catted Y combo was like $1,300. I'd gladly leave 9hp on the table if it means saving me $1,000.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 12:16 AM
  #30  
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
Tech Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 3
From: Philly
Default

It ran me around $1,100. Well worth it for the fit, finish, fitment and maximum horsepower. Now I just need my ported throttle body and tune and my car's done being modded for a long time.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 10:07 AM
  #31  
NOBR8KSS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Default

I'll throw in my $02. (This is for the original poster...not the internet know-it-alls)
I bought MAC headers way back when they were one of the few headers on the market. They are ceramic coated and I payed $960 for them.
Pros:
They fit well
They make good power. I picked up 22 rwhp going from stock manifolds and y-pipe.
Cons:
mild steel...the ceramic coating is coming off and they are rusting...that started after about 6 months
cost (new)

If I were to do it again, I would spend my money on stainless headers like QTPs or Kooks. I couldn't justify spending almost a grand on mid-lengths.
However, if you can get a set for $200...already ceramic coated...then go for it. That is definitely worth it...it's hard to get that kind of hp gain for that price.
MACs aren't crappy...they are a good header. This debate has been going on for years...everyone still has there own opinion about it.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 03:09 PM
  #32  
gillbot's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
From: East Palestine, OH - USA
Default

Originally Posted by NOBR8KSS
I'll throw in my $02. (This is for the original poster...not the internet know-it-alls)
I bought MAC headers way back when they were one of the few headers on the market. They are ceramic coated and I payed $960 for them.
Pros:
They fit well
They make good power. I picked up 22 rwhp going from stock manifolds and y-pipe.
Cons:
mild steel...the ceramic coating is coming off and they are rusting...that started after about 6 months
cost (new)

If I were to do it again, I would spend my money on stainless headers like QTPs or Kooks. I couldn't justify spending almost a grand on mid-lengths.
However, if you can get a set for $200...already ceramic coated...then go for it. That is definitely worth it...it's hard to get that kind of hp gain for that price.
MACs aren't crappy...they are a good header. This debate has been going on for years...everyone still has there own opinion about it.
I don't disagree with any of these statements. I bought mine when the options were FLP's and MACs. MACs were a great buy for the $. I still tell people to buy LT's but calling macs a "waste" and not worth $5 or whatever is a joke.

As for your fabricated numbers and assumptions, do the swap in one day with back to back dyno runs and I'll believe it. Otherwise i'll believe what i've seen with MY OWN eyes and not internet rumor and speculation.

Also, AS I SAID before. I continually tell people to buy LT's not but if they have $100 and they can get a set of MACs for that, go for it if that is their ONLY option.

Oh, and way to step up and crack about only being at 399RWHP. I'll take that and be proud of it. How many cars out there with WAY more mods than mine are well below that number? I'm happy where the car is at.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 03:26 PM
  #33  
dug's Avatar
dug
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

Macs arent the best but they make power. For the price of used macs and used cam youll make more power per dollar over the QTp's. If you do the install yourself.

If I did it over, Id get long tubes cuz theyve gotten cheaper. The reason I bought the macs was theyre much lighter than cast iron manifolds, they fit, and were cheap.

And taco, get off your high horse. What does your car run and how much did you spend? I spent less than a grand in mods to pick 8mph and 8 tenths
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 06:33 PM
  #34  
INMY01TA's Avatar
11 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,235
Likes: 2
From: Crofton Md.
Default

Originally Posted by dug
And taco, get off your high horse. What does your car run and how much did you spend? I spent less than a grand in mods to pick 8mph and 8 tenths
That's the funny part. I believe he still runs 14s and is tellin people faster what's what.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 08:09 AM
  #35  
JonB's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 704
Likes: 3
From: Orange Park FL
Default

I picked up a set of macs for cheap I think it was $125 used ceramic coated. Did some work, ported the primarys because straight from mac the welds on the inside are a mess, also cut off the ball flange. Reused the borla 2.5in y-pipe that was already on the car. The key to macs is they need work, I would never recomend anyone just slap them on ther car they way they come from mac. The number one most restrictive part is that pos ball flange, the header goes from 3in to 2 1/4 I believe. Then there's the primaries you can easly clean up the welds on each one and gain 1/4in diamiter on each primary.

As for ground clearance macs do have better clearance, Period. I know dozens of f-body guys around here with long tubes and everyone of them hang lower and most have scraped there setups and non of them run slps. I have not scraped once and everything tucks nicely. Ground clearance was my main reason behind considering macs but was not sold untill I found a good deal on here locally. Also in my opinion there is nothing that ruinins a clean car than to see headers and exhuast pipes hanging under it, looks like **** to me. Around hear every entrance to anywhere is at a incline or a dip, every parking lot has 50 enourmous speed bumps.

I have no before dyno nor do I have a dyno comparing longtubes to my macs, but that is one smoth all power curve for some crappy macs. Picked up 17hp and 19ft lbs from just the tune. Also my car has no head or cam, just bolt ons, full cated exhaust, ported tb, underdrive, lid.


As for the original topic how much would you pay I'd have to say $175-$200.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 08:54 AM
  #36  
Black99CamaroSS's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Alma, Ar.
Default

Those are some solid numbers for those mods.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #37  
dug's Avatar
dug
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

yeah, I wouldnt pay more than $200 for them. Another nice thing about macs is they dont require o2 expensions.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2007 | 08:07 AM
  #38  
gillbot's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
From: East Palestine, OH - USA
Default

Originally Posted by dug
yeah, I wouldnt pay more than $200 for them. Another nice thing about macs is they dont require o2 expensions.
Spoken like a man who actually knows about macs!

I have said get LT's unless you can get macs for a steal of a price. Otherwise, with the price of LT's lately, unless you have a specific need for macs don't bother. They DO make good power though not the best but then again, there will ALWAYS be something better.

Telling someone they aren't worth $5 and to save for better is a joke. Might as well tell them to save until they can make their car run 9s or don't bother modding at all.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 AM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE