Check out this new intake for LS7, L92, C5R
#42
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Michigan, auburn HIlls
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We tested the manifold at Katech (a great group of very knowledgeable guys) today.
We were up 58 torque and 55 hp.
Torque peak 616 at 5197RPM 528 at 3193RPM.
HP Peak 696 at 6398RPM. 504 at 4389RPM and 662 at 7000RPM.
These number are over stock LS7 intake with UMI 90mm throttle body. Engine was a 11.1 comp with a wild cam and headers.
We were up 58 torque and 55 hp.
Torque peak 616 at 5197RPM 528 at 3193RPM.
HP Peak 696 at 6398RPM. 504 at 4389RPM and 662 at 7000RPM.
These number are over stock LS7 intake with UMI 90mm throttle body. Engine was a 11.1 comp with a wild cam and headers.
#43
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We tested the manifold at Katech (a great group of very knowledgeable guys) today.
We were up 58 torque and 55 hp.
Torque peak 616 at 5197RPM 528 at 3193RPM.
HP Peak 696 at 6398RPM. 504 at 4389RPM and 662 at 7000RPM.
These number are over stock LS7 intake with UMI 90mm throttle body. Engine was a 11.1 comp with a wild cam and headers.
We were up 58 torque and 55 hp.
Torque peak 616 at 5197RPM 528 at 3193RPM.
HP Peak 696 at 6398RPM. 504 at 4389RPM and 662 at 7000RPM.
These number are over stock LS7 intake with UMI 90mm throttle body. Engine was a 11.1 comp with a wild cam and headers.
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
When will pricing be available??
#46
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Any news on this setup?
Is it intended to fit under a the C5 hood?
Any results from tests with ported heads, and wilder cams? As the 700hp, 600ftlb engine numbers are close to what is already achievable.
WOuld this setup require a switch to Speed Density vs MAF tuning?
Is it intended to fit under a the C5 hood?
Any results from tests with ported heads, and wilder cams? As the 700hp, 600ftlb engine numbers are close to what is already achievable.
WOuld this setup require a switch to Speed Density vs MAF tuning?