camcamaro1991

iTrader: (18)

Ok i gave in and dyno the car day

i laided down 348 HP 365 TQ on a dynojet

mods are in sig...

what do you guys think

got a cam in the mail cant wait...

bestfromnw

iTrader: (1)

thats pretty impressive. i hope that my car will put down numbers like that once i get on modding it. i wish my car came with ls6 intake

Bonertee

iTrader: (1)

Looks like some good numbers to me. Mine did 336 rwhp and 336 rwtq on a dynojet with mods in sig.

radz282003

iTrader: (1)

360+/370+ RWHP/RWTQ on a Dyno Dynamics with most bolt-ons.

Mike@ZMS

iTrader: (10)

I put down 340/360 with K&N, SLP lid, Smooth bellows and a tune. If your untuned, thats pretty impressive. With a tune you should pick up more. Oh yeah, the dyno numbers are from Haddad Motorsports dynapack and their tuner George Lara (12secSS)did the tune. They did an awesome job.

camcamaro1991

iTrader: (18)

yup, UNTUNED. only used HP TUNERS to turn off codes, elimate skip shift, and rear O2's.
yeah i ran at 14.2 A/F from 2400rpms to 4800rpms and then 13.8 A/F up until 6200rpms. a little on the lean side, but its a stock tune.
i have a wideband i just need to hook it to the car and start logging.
thanks guys i may just tune it and dyno again and then do the cam swap in 2weeks. because my springs and rods are on back order....

Pewter02WS6

iTrader: (1)

Not here to burst your bubble but those numbers aren't what your really putting down. You did that on a dynojet which shows much higher numbers. But impressive nonetheless. Get on a load dyno (example Mustand dyno) when you get it tuned.

Pewter02WS6

iTrader: (1)

I need to get mine back on the dyno while the whether is cool to see what mine is putting down. I put down 303rwhp and 312lb/ft of torque BONE stock in an auto on our dynomite loader dyno. I have since added the lid, smooth bellow, LT's, ORY, and slp loudmouth. I now have the stock air box back on but it still feels the same. I guess cause I have a K&N??

LS1>*

iTrader: (5)

Seems about right...

I put down 334whp and 350 wtq with the mods in my sig minus the lid.

I need LT's and a cam

camcamaro1991

iTrader: (18)

i do understand the difference with the load/ed dynos, but dynojet is not the worst dyno. yeah i wanted to use a mustang dyno, but we used my friends shop, cheaper sinces its my friend hookups. i need to get it tuned no argument there.
i am using this dyno as my base line. since i have ordered a cam and wanted to see the difference on the same dyno.
also i wanted to point out how good the stock CME exhaust is i only gained
6hp/7tq with the cutouts open, vs running it out the back stock exhaust
1st run cutouts closed 342hp/358tq
2nd run cutouts opened 347hp/364tq
3rd run cutouts opened 348hp/365tq

also guys any other input is welcome.

Mike@ZMS

iTrader: (10)

Are you serious?

As long as the numbers are SAE corrected, then it should be an accurate reflection of the power being put down. Mustang dynos tend to dyno lower numbers than Dynojets, Ill give you that, but the dynapack is a load dyno and it is about on par with the dynojet with the measurements of power while using SAE correction.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but the only reason why mustang dynos show a "lower" number is because of the way they measure the output... the Mustang dynos are the only ones that use a eddie current style measurement unit. But your argument is invalid. If he went on a true load style dyno like a Dynapack, then he would have had very similar power numbers measured.

To the OP, congrats on the numbers, they are very respectable and accurate.