Bolt on DYNO #'s
yeah i ran at 14.2 A/F from 2400rpms to 4800rpms and then 13.8 A/F up until 6200rpms. a little on the lean side, but its a stock tune.
i have a wideband i just need to hook it to the car and start logging.
thanks guys i may just tune it and dyno again and then do the cam swap in 2weeks. because my springs and rods are on back order....
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
i am using this dyno as my base line. since i have ordered a cam and wanted to see the difference on the same dyno.
also i wanted to point out how good the stock CME exhaust is i only gained
6hp/7tq with the cutouts open, vs running it out the back stock exhaust
1st run cutouts closed 342hp/358tq
2nd run cutouts opened 347hp/364tq
3rd run cutouts opened 348hp/365tq
also guys any other input is welcome.
Last edited by camcamaro1991; Feb 2, 2008 at 06:56 PM.
As long as the numbers are SAE corrected, then it should be an accurate reflection of the power being put down. Mustang dynos tend to dyno lower numbers than Dynojets, Ill give you that, but the dynapack is a load dyno and it is about on par with the dynojet with the measurements of power while using SAE correction.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the only reason why mustang dynos show a "lower" number is because of the way they measure the output... the Mustang dynos are the only ones that use a eddie current style measurement unit. But your argument is invalid. If he went on a true load style dyno like a Dynapack, then he would have had very similar power numbers measured.
To the OP, congrats on the numbers, they are very respectable and accurate.


