FAST 90mm Intakes - DISCONTINUED
#28
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (29)
I dont see the 92mm vs 90mm being any more than 5 to 8 rwhp difference on the dyno and that wont be anything a good driver cant make up. 2mm more from a 90 to 92 is bigger but me personally Im not going to worry about it isnt always better considering the majority of people are just head and cam stock cubic inch cars but if I had the choice I would more than likely buy the 92 If I didnt already have the 90 but Im not going to worry about it. Im sure its a GREAT PIECE to.
#32
Tech Resident
Well, the FAST 92/92 should cost about exactly the same to manufacture as the 90/90, and if they sold both, they'd have to lower the price of the 90/90. Therefore, just about everyone would buy the 90/90 because it's cheaper for the lousy 2 mm, so they'd lose a lot of money. By only making one, they maximize profits.
#35
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont see the 92mm vs 90mm being any more than 5 to 8 rwhp difference on the dyno and that wont be anything a good driver cant make up. 2mm more from a 90 to 92 is bigger but me personally Im not going to worry about it isnt always better considering the majority of people are just head and cam stock cubic inch cars but if I had the choice I would more than likely buy the 92 If I didnt already have the 90 but Im not going to worry about it. Im sure its a GREAT PIECE to.