hooker vs flowmaster
Last edited by ChevyRyda99LS1; Aug 4, 2008 at 04:18 PM.
-Hooker is lighter
-Hooker flows as well (or better)
-Hooker is a tad cheaper
-Hooker isn't quite as raspy
The only downsides is it's not stainless steel. But are you going to keep your car for 20 yrs? That and the tips. Make sure to squirt a coat of clear on the tips before install, because they're known to tarnish.
The Hooker CB is my favorite of all the catbacks, and this is coming from someone who's installed every F-body catback under the sun since 1997. I've ran them on my personal vehicles for 5+ yrs at a time with no problems.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
If you like loud CB this one may not be for you as normal light driving it isn't that loud
-Hooker is lighter
-Hooker flows as well (or better)
-Hooker is a tad cheaper
-Hooker isn't quite as raspy
The only downsides is it's not stainless steel. But are you going to keep your car for 20 yrs? That and the tips. Make sure to squirt a coat of clear on the tips before install, because they're known to tarnish.
The Hooker CB is my favorite of all the catbacks, and this is coming from someone who's installed every F-body catback under the sun since 1997. I've ran them on my personal vehicles for 5+ yrs at a time with no problems.
Also, a car that I tune went from 382rwhp to 399rwhp (dang that last missing HP!) losing the Flowmaster for the Hooker catback on the same dyno, same day. M6, DJ 248. I was effin shocked...
H/C/headers makes a huge difference
PS. I had Flowmaster 2 chamber B4 the Hooker. Stock the FM sounded better cause the Hooker was kinda mild.










