valve spring comparison
i was thinking "maybe they are over kill with my cam"
i see the beehive springs are good for some 650 lift and they are single compared to the double.
i was wanting to know if the single springs offer quicker revs and more response
due to the lesser spring pressure.
i was also wanting to bump up the car while i'm in there to maybe a 230 .590 112 cam
any input appreciated
i was thinking "maybe they are over kill with my cam"
i see the beehive springs are good for some 650 lift and they are single compared to the double.
i was wanting to know if the single springs offer quicker revs and more response
due to the lesser spring pressure.
i was also wanting to bump up the car while i'm in there to maybe a 230 .590 112 cam
any input appreciated
. i have the same dual springs and i like the security of having an extra spring so if i decide too open up the 3 1/2 in race headers . also a4/m6 ?? i was thinking "maybe they are over kill with my cam"
i see the beehive springs are good for some 650 lift and they are single compared to the double.
i was wanting to know if the single springs offer quicker revs and more response
due to the lesser spring pressure.
i was also wanting to bump up the car while i'm in there to maybe a 230 .590 112 cam
any input appreciated
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
It seems with less weight to control, less friction/heat (from coils rubbing), and less spring pressure requirements (also less friction and heat) that the beehive would last longer. OEM's seem to agree too.






