Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.3L 396 stroker?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2008, 02:12 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ZMONSTER!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 5.3L 396 stroker?

Hey all Ive been without my car for a couple weeks (clutch went by-by) so lately Ive been looking for other projects.
Lately seems like I see more and more people going with a 5.3L block, seems to make sense as I can pick one up for $100. Ive read that like the LS1 max it can be bored is 3.905. With a 4 inch stroke it would make a 383 and a 4.125 would make 396, am I right?
So just for the sake of discussion what would be the downfalls, if any, of persuing a 396 5.3L stroker? As far as I know, using the measurments above, Ive begun to assemble a parts list. Im not actually going to build something like this, at least not soon!

Block: 5.3L Iorn block $100-$200

RODS: Eagle SIR6250BBLW 6.250" $305.33

Crankshaft: K1 Crankshafts (By Carrillo) 346-4125RB6F 4.125Stroke $785
SCAT Chevy Forged 4340 4-LS1-4125-6125-24 4.125Stroke $699

PISTONS: Diamond/Mahle forged 3.905bore +/- 600 dollars

Obviously I would need alot more to put it together, but what are your thoughts on a build of this nature? Would it be reliable? Would it put the block under undue strain?
Ive posted up the same thread in the performance truck section to see what they say, but wanted to see what yall think too.
Thanks all!

Oh by the way Im well aware of the 6 liter option, but this is simply for the sake of discussion, so please no "get a 6L/LS2 block" answers!
Old 11-03-2008, 11:32 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (28)
 
WYATT318MOPAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Grayson, KY 41143
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I see no problem with doing this. Personally I think the 4.125 stroke is a bit much compared to the small bore. I actually have a 5.3 that spun a bearing I am gonna do a bigger cube build with and leave the 5.3 on the front of the block so it is like a big cube sbc in an old school sleaper. Thinking about putting it in my 31 ford.
Old 11-03-2008, 11:35 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ZMONSTER!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well one could go with a 4 inch crank and make a 383 and be loser to square, anyone else?
Old 11-03-2008, 02:40 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
david vericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mi
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZMONSTER!
Well one could go with a 4 inch crank and make a 383 and be loser to square, anyone else?
I inquired about the 4.125" crank prior to purchasing the 4.00" (383) stroker kit from Eagle.The tech at Eagle advised me to go with the 383,he stated the 4.125" stroker would cause an adverse rod angle that decreases the life spand of the motor.

Your best bet is to call the various manufactures of stroker kits and get their take on this.
Old 06-09-2009, 12:48 PM
  #5  
Teching In
 
yrusoslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default info

its nice to finally get some 5.3 info with out all of the comments being get a 6.0
Old 06-09-2009, 02:28 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

The block can take it and if arranged professionaly, it will work fine. Longevity depends on who builds it and how much detail went into it.
There is always the option of 4.100 crank as well 393 cid.
Old 06-09-2009, 05:36 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
lazylongboarder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like the 393 idea, it'd be a torquey little SB (Som'bitch).


BTW...get a 6.0
Old 06-09-2009, 05:56 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
sixt9er's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 506
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

My 2003 Silverado has a 5.3L and I want to build another (more power) engine for it. I was debating on what to do? Does anyone know the max bore for a 5.3 could take? I do like the idea of a 383 or even a 396....hmmm
Old 06-09-2009, 10:49 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
hummel25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i also have i 5.3 i want to stroke. my question is do you have to have the block clearenced if you put in a 6.0 crank?
Old 06-10-2009, 12:06 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
 
xdanny510x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hayward CA
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sixt9er
My 2003 Silverado has a 5.3L and I want to build another (more power) engine for it. I was debating on what to do? Does anyone know the max bore for a 5.3 could take? I do like the idea of a 383 or even a 396....hmmm
the max bore u can get out of the 5.3 safely is boring it to make it a iron 5.7 383 stroker... im not sure about a 396 tho///
Old 06-10-2009, 01:59 AM
  #11  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (25)
 
Hamrdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wichita Falls, Tx.
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have an LS6 396 stroker with a Lunati assembly. I don't see any reason it couldn't be done to your 5.3. If u plan on going na it should be fine but if you want to spray it then it requires a lot of bank roll to ensure the pistons last. Such as coating the sides,crowns, and combustion chambers and a whole lot of other precautions. If u want to spray it and not spend a ton of money I would go with a 383. That way you have more piston and it can take more heat and abuse.
Old 06-10-2009, 02:06 AM
  #12  
Staging Lane
 
2000camaroSS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Antonio Tx
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i thought the 5.3 was only in brand new trucks anyways i feel like an idiot gonna stop talkin now
Old 11-10-2009, 06:57 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
 
Transamthunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 158
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I was just looking on ebay at cranks, ideas popped up for me too while I made a beeline to search anything up for it. Course all the pros i have seen say dont go over 4.00 in since the crown of the piston, and the ring pack will be extremely small, and making it more prone to rocking at bdc, again back to the experts.
Old 11-10-2009, 09:03 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
SOMbitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Most people stay at 383 because on on the bottom stroke the piston comes out of the bore too much and causes longevity issues on a 396.
Old 11-10-2009, 10:20 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
cdubbzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 746
Received 214 Likes on 95 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SOMbitch
Most people stay at 383 because on on the bottom stroke the piston comes out of the bore too much and causes longevity issues on a 396.
11k miles on my 395ci 3.915 bore x 4.100 stroke
But it's no slap-it-together method. My engine builder is about as **** as they come..prob a good thing
Old 11-10-2009, 10:34 PM
  #16  
TECH Regular
 
texas94z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Keller, Texas
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by cdubbzz
11k miles on my 395ci 3.915 bore x 4.100 stroke
But it's no slap-it-together method. My engine builder is about as **** as they come..prob a good thing
What kind of numbers are you making?
Old 11-12-2009, 07:03 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
cdubbzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 746
Received 214 Likes on 95 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by texas94z
What kind of numbers are you making?
#'s have varied over the years, last pull in July '08 was 463rwhp/462rwtq SAE
not that it makes a whole lot of diff but was through 3" steel d/s, 12 bolt and 3.90 gears

def not a peaky combo but has major grunt and gets my tank moving
has run 11.14 @ 125mph at 3700lbs


Last edited by cdubbzz; 11-12-2009 at 10:51 PM.
Old 01-25-2010, 04:13 PM
  #18  
On The Tree
 
Transamthunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 158
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hey Cdubzz, what cam and heads you using for that motor.
Old 01-25-2010, 04:53 PM
  #19  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Black FormulaLs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: cape vincent NY
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

wow great info here...i have been thinking about building a 5.3L and then getting a body to put it in..great ideas over at the conversions forum too!!
Old 01-26-2010, 08:27 PM
  #20  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (23)
 
JohnFrazee02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fort Hood TX. 76522
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks like I need to find another 5.3 so I can build a stroker.


Quick Reply: 5.3L 396 stroker?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 AM.