Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

6.77 @ 102.95 mph with an internally stock LQ4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2008 | 11:48 PM
  #21  
the_merv's Avatar
11 Second Club
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 21,007
Likes: 881
From: The Beach...
Default

Yea, that is pretty good power for that little Cam..
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 11:22 PM
  #22  
zx9rgreen's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Wetumpka, AL
Default

Originally Posted by Soul TKR
I don't have any track times... but you can see my LQ4 build in my sig pic below.. (more specs on my website)

I've got a baby cam and make good power...
I'm assuming from your sig that you are not running the stock LQ4 pistons. With 59CC heads you would only be about 10.5:1 CR and not the 11.1:1 you have listed. Nice numbers either way.

I am setting up a LQ4 with PRC5.3 heads milled .02 (59cc) with a cam 224/236 609/607 111+2 and LS6 intake. I am hoping for the magic 400rwhp number
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 11:48 PM
  #23  
the_merv's Avatar
11 Second Club
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 21,007
Likes: 881
From: The Beach...
Default

^^I don't see why that wouldn't hit that mark..
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 11:53 PM
  #24  
LSXS10's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Finger TN.
Default

That is a pretty quick setup, 6.77 is dooable. Mine was carbed with a 212 224 cam stock 317s and stock lq9 shortblock with good bolts. @ 3420# i went 7.40s on the motor, 6.60s on a 150 shot, and 6.30s on a 200 shot. The 200 shot = 1.38 60' and on motor it was a 1.60-5 60'. 110 was the best mph, it fell off a little on the big end. These stock bottom 6.0s have potential to run pretty quick.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 12:03 AM
  #25  
zx9rgreen's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Wetumpka, AL
Default

Originally Posted by LSXS10
That is a pretty quick setup, 6.77 is dooable. Mine was carbed with a 212 224 cam stock 317s and stock lq9 shortblock with good bolts.
Heath,

Did you true-up the rods after the bolt installation? Im installing some ARP2000 in the motor I bought from you and was curious.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 04:47 AM
  #26  
chrs1313's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by pdbq
That's a hella crazy 60'! That converter must hit harder than most street setups!
yeah it hits like a beast, i think some of it is due to the trq it makes off the line too, most big cams dont have any bottom end, my car makes its times in the first half of the track,
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 05:47 AM
  #27  
the_merv's Avatar
11 Second Club
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 21,007
Likes: 881
From: The Beach...
Default

Originally Posted by chrs1313
most big cams dont have any bottom end, my car makes its times in the first half of the track,
That's kinda how mine feels like, it gets off the line and down the first 1000ft hard, then kinda fades out..
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 08:13 AM
  #28  
SladeX's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 2
Default

I would say that 360 on a stock cam is possible with a m6

I had 349RWHP with cats on, no underpulley yet, the LS7 clutch(extra rotational weight) and heavy 315 tires on 17 inch rims.

Take the cats off, toss on underpulley, go to a lighter LS1 type clutch, ditch the rims for lighter stockers and maybe a electric pump and easily see those numbers.

Now for a cam car to hit 10's? Mild is a 22x cam as I recall and those usually produce low 12's or 11's if done just right, can't picture the words mild, 10's + gas mileage all in the same sentence unless power adder is also added.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 PM.