ASA cam?
Racing 1518 Beehive Valve Springs - Max Lift .650"
FTI Seven Degree Chromemoly Retainers
FTI Hardened Seven Degree Valve Locks
Steel Shelled Viton Valve Stem Seals
FTI Pro-Series Hardened Pushrods
$975 with FREE shipping!
Pricey....which is why I am looking at the asa, or something like an TSP m3 cam kit or similar.
What was wrong about it streetablility wise? To much lope, and bucking and whatnot in the lower rpm range?
I did do pulls on the same dyno with both cams, and both times were SAE adjusted - so that should rule out any differences. New cam was 27 hp gain and 1 ft/lb, with very similar torque curves, new cam being about 10 ft/lbs more from 1500-3000, then similar the rest of the way out
My my main streetability issue was bucking at anything under 2k rpm (I'm a 6 speed)
Racing 1518 Beehive Valve Springs - Max Lift .650"
FTI Seven Degree Chromemoly Retainers
FTI Hardened Seven Degree Valve Locks
Steel Shelled Viton Valve Stem Seals
FTI Pro-Series Hardened Pushrods
$975 with FREE shipping!
Pricey....which is why I am looking at the asa, or something like an TSP m3 cam kit or similar.
You have the TSP kit?
Some people say it has good manners. Maybe it's their tune, or maybe just their opinion of what good manners are, and how much surging they are willing to deal with? Hell, even with my new cam it surges a little sometimes, but nothing compared to the asa.
I got my cam spec'd by pat g for $25. Comp grinds it, sends it to TSP, I orginally paid $625 for the cam, pushrods, and comp 918s. I decided not to go with the 918's and got the PAC1518's which I think ended up costing me an extra $75 or something.
Like i said before the torque curve as flat as it gets, there is no abuse on your valve train, (good for daily driver) and still puts out decent dyno #'s. My old setup was ls1 intake and flowmaster80 with no pully or ported tb and it still put down 369hp on a mustang dyno from a tuner who was dogshit. The only reason i changed out mine is because im an idiot and i was dealing with a terrible shop.( not that i'm not happy with my torquer2
). The asa is perfectly dailydrivable and anyone who tells you otherwise is either clueless or has dogshit for a tuner. haha... sorry for the hostile post.
Like i said before the torque curve as flat as it gets, there is no abuse on your valve train, (good for daily driver) and still puts out decent dyno #'s. My old setup was ls1 intake and flowmaster80 with no pully or ported tb and it still put down 369hp on a mustang dyno from a tuner who was dogshit. The only reason i changed out mine is because im an idiot and i was dealing with a terrible shop.( not that i'm not happy with my torquer2
). The asa is perfectly dailydrivable and anyone who tells you otherwise is either clueless or has dogshit for a tuner. haha... sorry for the hostile post.
GM didn't invest millions of dollars and years of research just to market something that doesn't work acreoss the board.
Like i said before the torque curve as flat as it gets, there is no abuse on your valve train, (good for daily driver) and still puts out decent dyno #'s. My old setup was ls1 intake and flowmaster80 with no pully or ported tb and it still put down 369hp on a mustang dyno from a tuner who was dogshit. The only reason i changed out mine is because im an idiot and i was dealing with a terrible shop.( not that i'm not happy with my torquer2
). The asa is perfectly dailydrivable and anyone who tells you otherwise is either clueless or has dogshit for a tuner. haha... sorry for the hostile post.

My point is that I am much happier with my custom spec'd cam. More power and better driveability. My torque curve is actually flatter with my cam than it was with the asa. I'll try to post my graphs.
http://www.corvetteidaho.com/hib/02ls6/page2.htm
That's a great article. Read the last 3 paragraphs. With exhaust, it is only worth a couple horse over the ls6 cam. I was told it was my exhaust that was holding the cam back. I don't consider mine very restrictive, and changing it wasn't an option. (ARH, catted-y, gmmg).
To each their own though
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

My point is that I am much happier with my custom spec'd cam. More power and better driveability. My torque curve is actually flatter with my cam than it was with the asa. I'll try to post my graphs.
Agreed. 2 things though. GM developed that cam as a racing (not street) cam - under the regulations of the class it was performing in. Had it been "anything goes" I'd be willing to bet it wouldn't be the same specs.
http://www.corvetteidaho.com/hib/02ls6/page2.htm
That's a great article. Read the last 3 paragraphs. With exhaust, it is only worth a couple horse over the ls6 cam. I was told it was my exhaust that was holding the cam back. I don't consider mine very restrictive, and changing it wasn't an option. (ARH, catted-y, gmmg).
To each their own though

All GMPP cams are streetable, as far as I know. Of course, that depends on an individual assessment of the word "streetable" though. I'm getting ready to field an LS7 Stage3 cam in a 427cid LS3.
You're probably right about GM not going with the specs they did if it were an open class of racing. But I bet they pushed it right to the edge in the class they were competing in.
As stated above, one major benefit is the low lift - which will promote long valvetrain life. Plus it just sounds mean as hell with the 110lsa
So in the end it's all about what you want.

Good luck on the ls3 build dragon.
As stated above, one major benefit is the low lift - which will promote long valvetrain life. Plus it just sounds mean as hell with the 110lsa
So in the end it's all about what you want.

Good luck on the ls3 build dragon.
GMPP is getting 515 crank hp out of the ASA in an LS3. I don't see any reason we can't. I'm kinda back to the 360 degree thing. You can steal from Peter to pay Paul, but there is only so much you can do with 360 degrees in a cam. To make more horsepower in a given range with a given engine, you will inevitably make sacrifices in others. To make more power all the way across the board, you end up making less peak. And then you end up making more changes to compensate for the previous compromise. I'm thinking about snaggin a GMPP 515 myself.. I'd rather be driving than waiting on "mythical" parts. lol
As stated above, one major benefit is the low lift - which will promote long valvetrain life. Plus it just sounds mean as hell with the 110lsa
So in the end it's all about what you want.

Good luck on the ls3 build dragon.
My LS1 threw a rod back in October, so I'm getting an L92 / LS3 swapped into the car. I decided against reusing an ASA due to the fact that the new motor uses a different head style. However, I did have Patrick G spec me out a cam for the new engine (main criteria was valvetrain longevity and a flat torque curve) and he specked out nearly the same cam in terms of duration, but raised the lift to over .600. I'm curious to see how it works in the new engine.


