Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

H/C Setup or Boost?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2009 | 08:50 PM
  #1  
LS1CMR's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: Lawrenceville, GA
Default H/C Setup or Boost?????

Ok i cant decide what to do, i have a chance to get a STS kit cheap but i also wouldnt mind a nice H/C setup, i need some opinions so i can decide. thanks
Old 03-03-2009 | 09:13 PM
  #2  
98RedBird's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,773
Likes: 3
From: Peoria, IL
Default

H/C. It's just a personal thing with me though. I know there's loads more potential with a F/I setup but there's just something about staying N/A... A well put together N/A max effort car is so much more impressive to me than a F/I car.

I'm not putting either down, they are both great in their own rite. To each their own!

BTW... If you're going to go F/I there are much better ways to go than the STS. A cheap STS kit is not something that I, personally, would jump on...
Old 03-03-2009 | 09:16 PM
  #3  
108dragon's Avatar
TECH Apprentice

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Southern Colorado Front Range
Default

^^^Right on!
Old 03-03-2009 | 09:21 PM
  #4  
TroyBoone's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default

ditto....not everyone can make a n/a powerhouse. it's much more research and calculation than simply putting in a blower or turbo. this is coming from a person that is building a n/a powerhouse.....but drives a blown gtp.
Old 03-03-2009 | 11:20 PM
  #5  
transamfreak01's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
Default

i personally would just do the heads and cam. way cheaper and youll have so much more fun on the street. with a f/i app ull have to spend a lot of money on other parts to run it safely
Old 03-04-2009 | 05:04 PM
  #6  
MelScrilla's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Default

this is just an opinion and not based on expierence but for mild street use it seems like n/a would be best. but if your looking for big power like over 500, a supercharger of turbo would be easier and more streetable.
Old 03-04-2009 | 06:02 PM
  #7  
eamador11's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 907
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default

heads/cam
Old 03-04-2009 | 06:08 PM
  #8  
99LS6SS's Avatar
TECH Regular

iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: Joplin, MO
Default

heads/cam
Old 03-04-2009 | 06:21 PM
  #9  
SOMbitch's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 3
Default

I am just not fond of the STS setup. A turbo belongs under the hood
Old 03-04-2009 | 06:55 PM
  #10  
99LS6SS's Avatar
TECH Regular

iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: Joplin, MO
Default

X2. . .
Old 03-04-2009 | 06:58 PM
  #11  
LS1CMR's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: Lawrenceville, GA
Default

right on, H/C it is, thanks for all your input, what whould yall suggest that get so i can make over 450whp, car is not daily driven, street manners arent an issue, he nastier sounding the better, been lookin at some of the options from Texas Speed. Any help would be great
Old 03-04-2009 | 07:07 PM
  #12  
Black01M6SS's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default

Coming from someone who went the boosted route I'm going to say good choice going H/C. If I had it to do over again it would be cam/nitrous... The stock shortblock is only good for about 500rwhp and there are some max effort H/C setups in that range. Its just not worth the cost and trouble to boost a stock shortblock IMO.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 AM.