Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why aren't 396 LS1 Strokers popular?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2004, 02:45 PM
  #41  
TECH Fanatic
 
kumar75150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by VINCE
Kumar I just read a earlier post. You are running a 244/250 with .630 lift cam. What LSA? No wonder your car peaks so high for that 4.125. That's why I said it depends on the cam..
Its on a 114 lsa. The cam is big compared to what some people run but if you think about the new Thunder cam on a 346, mine is comparatively small. The car takes about 5 seconds to find idle and driveability is fine.

I will post some dynos after I get car back from its updates.
Old 02-15-2004, 02:53 PM
  #42  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

The only substitute for cubic inches is more cubic inches
Old 02-15-2004, 02:54 PM
  #43  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Black Sunshine/ 00SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike K.
That is awesome for that cam size. I bet your setup is streetable as hell also which is awesome.
Yes, it idles nice & doesn't stall out at lights, like this cam did when it was in the stock displacement. I like to drive it every chance I get.

I'm thinking about bumping it up to a bigger cam, but will most likely wait until some of the new items come out & see how they pan out.
Old 02-15-2004, 03:00 PM
  #44  
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
VINCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valrico, Florida
Posts: 8,260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kumar75150
Its on a 114 lsa. The cam is big compared to what some people run but if you think about the new Thunder cam on a 346, mine is comparatively small. The car takes about 5 seconds to find idle and driveability is fine.

I will post some dynos after I get car back from its updates.
It sounds like you have a awesome setup. Keep us posted.
Old 02-15-2004, 04:45 PM
  #45  
11 Second Club
 
GrapeApe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brew City
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I also agree --a lot of the kits avail are too under square --the best way imo is a 388 all bore -ive seen 510 come out of some of those --I guess it all comes down to balanceing
Old 02-15-2004, 04:56 PM
  #46  
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
VINCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valrico, Florida
Posts: 8,260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nine Ball
Oversquare engines tend to rev quicker than undersquare engines also.

Tony
This may sound silly, but does revving quicker mean you are moving faster? If yes, then why would you want to build a undersquare motor for drag racing or even street racing?
Old 02-15-2004, 07:34 PM
  #47  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
Cliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: deam land
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I like my 396. TQ is great and power is good also.
Old 02-16-2004, 03:10 AM
  #48  
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Posts: 486
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Cool

As far I understand, between the boring or stroking is the following:

When you bore an engine, the engine tend to make more Hp, which mean you make HP > TQ, and usually the HP peak's in the higher range of RPM...And this is why road racing engine is bored to make use of the HP at a higher RPM (from 5000 RPM ~ 9000 RPM)

When you stroke an engine, the engine tend to make more TQ, which mean you make TQ = HP or TQ > HP, and usually the TQ peak's in a lower range of RPM (From 3000 RPM ~ 4500 RPM)...and this is why street racing enigne can benifit from that case, where in the street racing you need TQ that make the car jump from the ground to fly...

Thanks...
Old 02-16-2004, 08:07 AM
  #49  
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
VINCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valrico, Florida
Posts: 8,260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS6
As far I understand, between the boring or stroking is the following:

When you bore an engine, the engine tend to make more Hp, which mean you make HP > TQ, and usually the HP peak's in the higher range of RPM...And this is why road racing engine is bored to make use of the HP at a higher RPM (from 5000 RPM ~ 9000 RPM)

When you stroke an engine, the engine tend to make more TQ, which mean you make TQ = HP or TQ > HP, and usually the TQ peak's in a lower range of RPM (From 3000 RPM ~ 4500 RPM)...and this is why street racing enigne can benifit from that case, where in the street racing you need TQ that make the car jump from the ground to fly...

Thanks...
If your rationale was correct then we would have more stroke than bore cars in drag racing. ET is 75 percent 60ft. On the street if you have too much torque you will never get traction. Plus, once the race begin you will never fall below your peak tq anyway..
Old 02-16-2004, 09:57 AM
  #50  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
BurnOut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dallas-freakin'-Texas
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

For a given size engine (call it a 388), the stroked motor will have more area under the curve and will generally peak lower in the RPM range (if cam/heads are the same for each motor). The all-bore motor will likely make a few more HP at (a higher) peak.

As for RPM levels for a given stroke, remember that there are plenty of other motors out there besides LS1's... for instance, the 5.4L Fords have a stroke of something like 4.15" (though they have that pathetically small bore at ~3.54") and in proper trim they can be wound out just fine. On the Chevy side, look at the 454 BBC... 4.25" bore, 4.00" stroke. 7500 RPM for a built 454 isn't unheard of, so it isn't like it can't be done (consider also, though, that the 454 is going to have a higher piston/rod weight and a taller deck height... the higher piston/rod weight of the 454 would give it a disadvantage compared to a 4" stroke LS1, but the taller deck height is going to allow for more advantageous pin placement).
Old 02-16-2004, 10:03 AM
  #51  
TECH Senior Member
 
CHRISPY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Think about critical piston speed.

Two engines:

3.62 stroke x 4 inch bore

4 inch stroke x 3.905 bore.

The 4 inch stroke motor will reach critical piston speed earlier, thereby theorectically limiting its rpm potential. Stronger rods, rod bolts etc can help increase critical piston speed rpm.

With a street motor that runs under 7200rpm this is a non-issue for the most part. As you go higher in the rev range this becomes much more of a factor. Again oiling is the big concern with these motors at high rpm and well as spring/lifter issues.

Cheers,
Chris
Old 02-16-2004, 10:50 PM
  #52  
On The Tree
 
fast 98 C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just to add something different, I have a 4.03 bore 6.0 block with a 4.250 crank which is a 434. She runs pretty good.
Old 02-16-2004, 10:51 PM
  #53  
TECH Fanatic
 
kumar75150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

OMG are you serious? A 4.25 crank. What the hell is wrong with you? Are you on crack?

lol I am just being sarcastic.
Old 02-16-2004, 10:57 PM
  #54  
On The Tree
 
fast 98 C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No Kumar no crack ! Just got talked into a big C.I. to try to make me go fast.
Old 02-16-2004, 11:45 PM
  #55  
TECH Fanatic
 
kumar75150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I was just being funny because most people are so scared of a 4.125 crank on this board.
Old 02-16-2004, 11:47 PM
  #56  
On The Tree
 
Mike's02Z28M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DaveSchott
remember most ss396's were actually 402's! put whatever badges on it and have fun, who'll know?
LOL - That's a fine point! To most people who ask, do we tell them we've got a 346 or a 350??
Old 02-17-2004, 07:56 AM
  #57  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
Reckless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 10,060
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

This is easy. I believe Eagle offers a crank in 3.900" stroke

3.9 stroke + 4.020 bore (iron) = 396cid

Make 450/450 on motor and throw a 200-shot at it
Old 02-17-2004, 02:34 PM
  #58  
TECH Senior Member
 
CHRISPY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Was that 4.25 stroke crank custom?

Cheers,
Chris
Old 02-17-2004, 03:12 PM
  #59  
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Posts: 486
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Question

I just want to understand about the subject of oil consumbsion in the stroked engine, where I don't have any experence at all about it...How it lead to eat oil in stroked engine than a bored engine...

I heard about the ford truck that is 5.4L and stroked but doesn't have any oil issue...

Also, as far as I know the stroked engine from the BMW on the M3 is very powerfull but I didn't hear any oil problem issue...

Could some one elaborate more on this subject for the sake of knowlage...

Thanks...

Last edited by LS6; 02-17-2004 at 03:19 PM.
Old 02-17-2004, 04:10 PM
  #60  
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
VINCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valrico, Florida
Posts: 8,260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kumar75150
OMG are you serious? A 4.25 crank. What the hell is wrong with you? Are you on crack?

lol I am just being sarcastic.
I am scared


Quick Reply: Why aren't 396 LS1 Strokers popular?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.