Why do no one use the 26915 valve spring?
They are not as stiff as the 918's -- allows for easier movement of valvetrain
and they cost just a tad bit less.
What is wrong with them?
their spring rates are about 20lbs less at seat and open compared to a 918
Both sets of springs will be replaced at some point, I wouldn't say I'm exactly COMFORTABLE with them, but they HAVE survived about 30k miles in each motor -- and they do what they're supposed to..
Both sets of springs will be replaced at some point, I wouldn't say I'm exactly COMFORTABLE with them, but they HAVE survived about 30k miles in each motor -- and they do what they're supposed to..
damn 30k on that kind of lift holy shiiiit! You probably better go ahead and swap those 918's out.
The big cam hasn't been in there all that long -- maybe 2000 miles so far.. But these springs (WAY WAY pre-blue stripe BTW) have been off the heads once for a valve job, and are working on their third cam.. First was a 221/227 .561/.569 for 23'ish thousand miles, then a 224/224 .581/.581 for another 3k or so, and now the 238/240 .605/.609 for the last 2k .. Not quite 30k on mine, but enough miles to say the "test" period is over...
I'm looking at changing the heads here once I squeeze the current setup to its fullest, to see just how much head technology has advanced since I got these back in 2000. Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time






