Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Drawbacks to stroking

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 11:14 AM
  #21  
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 2
Default

Then you are listening to the wrong people. I would like to know what their opinion of a 4" stroke is and why they claim it is bad.
There is nothing at all wrong with a slightly under square motor (more stroke than bore). As long as you build to suit that architecture you will have a killer motor. Now, don't go and put a 4.25" crank in a 4.8L block; it will never breathe because of the small bore (Think old school 305-307). Try to keep the bore and stroke within .125" if each other. A 3.898" LS1 block with a 4" stroke is fine. A 4" bore LS2/iron block and 4.100" stroke is also fine. They will perform and last. Just do it already!

Last edited by 1CAMWNDR; Aug 26, 2009 at 11:44 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 11:26 AM
  #22  
david vericker's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Mi
Default

Originally Posted by 1CAMWNDR
Then you are listening to the wrong people. I would like to know what their opinion of a 4" stroke is and why they claim it is bad.
There is nothing at all wrong with a slightly under square motor (more stroke than bore). As long as you build to suit that architecture you will have a killer motor. Now, don't go and put a 4.25" crank in a 4.8L block; it will never breathe because of the small bore (Think old school 305-307). Try to keep the bore and stroke within .125" if each other. A 3.898" LS1 block with a 4" bore is fine. A 4" LS2/iron block and 4.100" is also fine. They will perform and last. Just do it already!
I think you meant to say...a LS1 3.898" block (bore) with a 4.00" stroke will work just fine.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 11:43 AM
  #23  
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by david vericker
I think you meant to say...a LS1 3.898" block (bore) with a 4.00" stroke will work just fine.
Yes, fixed and thank you.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 11:50 AM
  #24  
knappbunch's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: va beach
Default

you will go blind!!! on the serious side the 402 or 408 route is pretty much worth it.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 02:17 PM
  #25  
99blancoSS's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 3
From: ST Helens, OR
Default

bigger is always better IMO
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 03:04 PM
  #26  
WSsick's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 3
From: St. Peters, MO
Default

coming back into the thread, i thought of a drawback...you might lose a few mpg.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 03:09 PM
  #27  
Michael02hawk's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 1
From: Rochester, NY
Default

The only drawback I can think of is you might have a chance of keeping up with me.

THAT would be a bad thing.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 11:18 PM
  #28  
HitmanLS1's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: MS
Default

Im thinking about 383 would this be ok for a dd? I am going to race it on weekends at the track? Would the PRC 2.5 LS6 heads work good for me with a good cam on a 150-200 shot? What cam would you all recommend?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 12:18 AM
  #29  
transamfreak01's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HitmanLS1
Im thinking about 383 would this be ok for a dd? I am going to race it on weekends at the track? Would the PRC 2.5 LS6 heads work good for me with a good cam on a 150-200 shot? What cam would you all recommend?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 12:21 AM
  #30  
HitmanLS1's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: MS
Default

Originally Posted by transamfreak01
Sorry man
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.