Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Compression test results!

Old Oct 18, 2009 | 02:00 PM
  #21  
stevied916's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 99RTA
So you say his bumbers are good no problem??? then why is he here??? LMAO
Because he is trying to figure out what is wrong and it isnt compression numbers. 160 psi is for around 9.5:1 compression champ
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 02:01 PM
  #22  
stevied916's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

Have you done a leakdown test?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 02:08 PM
  #23  
JFM-jr's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 1
From: Mastic Long Island N.Y.
Default

Be warned this guy loves to argue over the internet.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 02:52 PM
  #24  
99RTA's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
Default

i'm not arguing, you guys don't know what yer talking about...how can you help anybody?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 03:11 PM
  #25  
99RTA's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
Default

before he wastes anymore time he should 1st decarbon the engine then do a leak down test. The results will tell him what to do. Purdy simple. Depending on the maintenance done on the car, oil changes etc it may need some work. But doing a leak test with carboned up pistons and rings will not show the true condition of the engine.

Buy one 20oz bottle of techron and add it to your fuel tank then drive it. This will clean everything up to the point you will get real compression readings. Sorry if you guys don't like my advice but i have lots and lots of experience to back me up.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 03:34 PM
  #26  
99RTA's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...sion-test.html read through this thread, it shows what a clean engine should read.

my 9:1 motor with a turbo cam, was reading in the 100-120 PSI on that gauge, a stock C6 Z06 reads about 150, and a z06 with 11.5:1 CR reads about 170.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 10:41 PM
  #27  
thunderstruck507's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,358
Likes: 27
From: Northwest AR
Default

what an arrogant jackass

are you in the 3rd grade?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 05:23 AM
  #28  
99RTA's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
Default

Thats the spirit! when you don't know anything call others names! LMAO
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 06:10 AM
  #29  
69LT1Bird's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 6
From: Lapeer, MI
Default

It could just be the gauge, no two are the same. As long as they are all within 10% you are fine and there are no blatant low or high numbers.

You could buy some GM Top Engine Cleaner and run that through the system and maybe clean up any carbon build up in the valves.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 08:10 AM
  #30  
Patrick G's Avatar
LS1 Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,246
Likes: 34
From: Victoria, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 99RTA
I gotta add something else......engines with INSANE compression ratios that would give you stock readings of 200+ compression DON"T EXIST on the street because the gasoline available would destroy them! GEEZ where do you guys dream up this stuff?
My 347 with 11.5:1 SCR and my 223/227 110LSA torque cam made 250psi cranking compression and ran every day on 93 octane. It also made torque like a stroker. It's all in the tune. Compression this high can live on pump fuel.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 09:03 AM
  #31  
GMTECH4's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 7
From: Columbus,Ga
Default

i think we need some more info on how the test was done. i was tought to have the throttle blade wide open, battery fully charged, all spark plugs removed (this could explain why cyl #1 is low if all the other plugs was in), etc.... like someone said up top^ don't get to caught up in psi #'s they should be within 10-20% of each other no two engines will test the same all the time. there is alot more to compression testing i just don't want to write a novel. if the engine had that much carbon build up it should be pinging like hell and show alot of knock retard.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 09:31 AM
  #32  
bigboykilroy's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 730
Likes: 4
From: Aurora, Ohio
Default

From your readings I can honestly concluded that you have a faulty flux capacitor.

Average readings on a Stock LS motor that I have seen have been in the 180 - 190 range.

Your Compression numbers are "Normal" and are within acceptable range.

Last edited by bigboykilroy; Oct 19, 2009 at 09:48 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 10:15 AM
  #33  
matrik's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default

Originally Posted by GMTECH4
i think we need some more info on how the test was done. i was tought to have the throttle blade wide open, battery fully charged, all spark plugs removed (this could explain why cyl #1 is low if all the other plugs was in), etc.... like someone said up top^ don't get to caught up in psi #'s they should be within 10-20% of each other no two engines will test the same all the time. there is alot more to compression testing i just don't want to write a novel. if the engine had that much carbon build up it should be pinging like hell and show alot of knock retard.
To do the test, we didn't have all the spark plugs out, so yes that is possible it threw that number off, but it didn't change any of the others even with only 1 plug removed. We pulled the fuel pump fuse, hooked up the tester, and cranked it about 4-5 times. Cleared the guage, and then did the same cylinder twice to make sure. We didn't have the throttle body open. I just did the basic stuff to do the compression test, i'm pretty sure we did it just fine. I'm thinking about seafoaming the car to help get rid of all the crap which is probably in there.

So if my numbers seem acceptable, what would cause it to burn oil, and put out a big blue cloud under WOT, am I looking at valve seals for sure?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 10:17 AM
  #34  
GreenbeanZ28's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Easley, SC
Default

When I did a compression test on my car, they were all in the 230's. I just attributed it to a combination of a bump in compression with milled heads and thinner heads gaskets along with the stock cam that has no overlap. I guess it was carbon build up all along!
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 11:09 AM
  #35  
bigboykilroy's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 730
Likes: 4
From: Aurora, Ohio
Default

A correct cam and milled heads WILL raise your compression.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 12:39 PM
  #36  
IWGF's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
From: Aztec, NM
Default

How dare you come with a rebuttal to 99RTA's argument. He has a 'whole lifetime' of automotive experience. Lol. So I figure he's maaaaybe about 2 years old.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 01:23 PM
  #37  
NoMoreFWD's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by IWGF
How dare you come with a rebuttal to 99RTA's argument. He has a 'whole lifetime' of automotive experience. Lol. So I figure he's maaaaybe about 2 years old.
The -1 trader rating is pretty impressive too.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 01:45 PM
  #38  
tittan1500's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: somerset WI
Default

Originally Posted by 99RTA
I've checked MANY MANY engines that had 190+ compression readings that read 160 after decarboning the cylinders. Go to GM any dealership and ask for their decarbon service and ask why they would bother to do it if it wasn't a HUGE PROBLEM.

I'll betcha stock LS1 in excellent shape will measurse in the 160 range same with the LS6, the ZO6 maybe in the 175 range.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 04:12 PM
  #39  
matrik's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default

Can everyone forget about this guy and actually answer my questions lol, this thread is like 2 pages of this
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 04:12 PM
  #40  
matrik's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Default

Originally Posted by stevied916
Have you done a leakdown test?
No, didn't have the leakdown tester tool when we did the compression test, would have loved to have done one
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.