Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

are my lifter bad or pushrods too big

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 05:40 PM
  #1  
6-Speed Terror's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: mcallen tx
Default are my lifter bad or pushrods too big

i didnt check my stuff properly after my rebuild and i need help figuring out whats wrong. well i milled te heads .025 and used cometics .040 but used my old pushrods 7.4's today i set piston 1 to compression stoke and loosened the rocker bolt and my spring came up a bit. now i double checked to stroke and hand tighted the rocker bolt and there was no more play on the pushrod and when i went to torque it the valve started to compress is my lifter not preloading? or is this normal or is my pushrod too big i will b ordering a pushrod length checker soon but hope there is nothing wrong with my lifters even though it doesnt seem normal to me.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 07:00 PM
  #2  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

Even with the correct pushrod length, if the lifters are full of oil when you tighten them down the valve will slightly open until the spring force bleeds the lifter down. Having said that, it sure appears your pushrods are too long and I personally wouldn't attempt to run the motor and likely wouldn't turn it over by hand unless I knew things clear. Now is not the time to make a costly mistake, get the length checker and verify things.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 07:13 PM
  #3  
XtraCajunSS's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 4
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Default

The TDC method is NOT always accurate. Try the EO/IC method to check pushrod length. I have posted directions on this forum numerous times... Here it is again:

FWIW, EVERY cam install I have done using the LS7 lifter with a cam with greater than .600" lift (read smaller base circle) AND stock heads w/GM MLS gaskets has taken 7.425" pushrods for ~.050"-.060" preload. We measure lifter preload on each and every cam install we do. I have never had a lifter failure nor do we end up with the dreaded "sewing machine" noise.

Its very simple, If you change ANY of the following:
valve sizes, valve job, head milling, thinner/thicker head gaskets, decked block, cam with an altered base circle, etc... YOU MUST CHECK FOR PROPER PUSHROD LENGTH.

I have helped countless numbers of individuals with this process over the phone, via email, and PM's. I've posted the process on at least 3 occasions.

Here it is again in a nutshell:

1. Using the EO/IC method, get the lifter to the base circle of the cam.
2. Using a known length pushrod (7.400" is a good start with stock rockers) run the rocker arm bolt down to zero lash. This is easily done with your fingers "wiggling" the rocker, the point at which the "slack" is just gone is zero lash.
3. Set your torque wrench to 22 lb./ft. Tighten the rocker to full torque and count the number of turns it takes to get there. 1 full turn wtih a stock 8mm X 1.25 bolt is ~.047" preload as measured at the pushrod/rocker interface.
4. I normally shoot for 1 1/4 to 1 3/4 turns with stock type lifters like Comp 850's, LS1, LS7 etc.

For an example, if you use a 7.400" pushrod and come up with 3/4 of a turn, you will need at least .025" longer pushrod to get into range. If you end up with 2 1/4 turns, you will need one .025" shorter...

I might not know everything but I will tell you that this method has worked for me year after year cam swap after cam swap. We average 3 cam swaps a week here so you can do the math.

If you are not familiar with the EO/IC method for determining valve events in a 4 stroke engine, its very simple:
For a given cylinder as the Exhaust valve is Opening, the intake lifter will be on the base circle of the cam and lash/preload should be checked for that intake valve.
For a given cylinder as the Intake valve is Closing, the exhaust lifter will be on the base circle of the cam and lash/preload should be checked for that exhaust valve.

THIS METHOD ALWAYS WORKS!!!

Check it using the above method and see where you are.

Thanks,
Shane
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 07:19 PM
  #4  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 89
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

^^^ so, with new lifters, after soaking them in oil are they ready to perform this test? Do you need to sub the valve spring for a dummy "helper" spring as not to collapse the lifter. Should you take an old lifter and weld it so it doesnt collapse?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 08:37 AM
  #5  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

Originally Posted by XtraCajunSS
3. Set your torque wrench to 22 lb./ft. Tighten the rocker to full torque and count the number of turns it takes to get there. 1 full turn wtih a stock 8mm X 1.25 bolt is ~.047" preload as measured at the pushrod/rocker interface.

Thanks,
Shane
Shane,

Have you measured this? With one turn on the bolt, the pushrod should deflect more due to rocker ratio (once the lifter plunger settles). Difference should be about 60%.

Last edited by vettenuts; Oct 18, 2009 at 08:43 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 12:09 PM
  #6  
XtraCajunSS's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 4
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
^^^ so, with new lifters, after soaking them in oil are they ready to perform this test? Do you need to sub the valve spring for a dummy "helper" spring as not to collapse the lifter. Should you take an old lifter and weld it so it doesnt collapse?
You want the lifters to collapse. That's what preload is.

Originally Posted by vettenuts
Shane,

Have you measured this? With one turn on the bolt, the pushrod should deflect more due to rocker ratio (once the lifter plunger settles). Difference should be about 60%.
Yes, measured at the tip of the pushrod with a dial indicator.

Thanks,
Shane
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #7  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

Originally Posted by XtraCajunSS
You want the lifters to collapse. That's what preload is.



Yes, measured at the tip of the pushrod with a dial indicator.

Thanks,
Shane
It can't be the same value as the bolt turn calculations, the rocker ratio will change the value.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 01:29 PM
  #8  
XtraCajunSS's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 4
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Default

I measured the preload at the pushrod tip of the rocker. That is a direct preload measurment. This was measured with 1.7 rockers. The difference between 1.7 and 1.8's would be negligable. This measurment was taken with a stock rocker and the stock 8mm X 1.25 rocker bolt.

Thanks,
Shane
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

6 Gifts Neither Your Dad Nor Grad Will Shove Into the 'Trinket Drawer'

 Brett Foote
story-1

Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-8

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-9

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 03:37 PM
  #9  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

Originally Posted by XtraCajunSS
I measured the preload at the pushrod tip of the rocker. That is a direct preload measurment. This was measured with 1.7 rockers. The difference between 1.7 and 1.8's would be negligable. This measurment was taken with a stock rocker and the stock 8mm X 1.25 rocker bolt.

Thanks,
Shane
I guess my point is if you move the bolt say one turn (0.049") then the pushrod end of the rocker must move more because the valve spring is the pivot point as the bolt brings the rocker pivot point down onto the support. In other words the bolt movement is less then the pushrod movement. I understand the measurement at the pushrod, that is the true preload and how I verify mine when I assemble as well.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #10  
XtraCajunSS's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 4
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Default

I am not saying the 1 turn equates to .047" of bolt movement. I am saying 1 full turn of the bolt equals .047" or lifter preload as measured with the stock 1.7 rockers and stock 8mmX1.25 bolt.

Shane
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 05:57 PM
  #11  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

Originally Posted by XtraCajunSS
I am not saying the 1 turn equates to .047" of bolt movement. I am saying 1 full turn of the bolt equals .047" or lifter preload as measured with the stock 1.7 rockers and stock 8mmX1.25 bolt.

Shane
One turn of the bolt is 1.25 mm or 0.049" at the bolt (1.25/25.4). I think the real point to emphasis is you guys actually measure to ensure correct preload as opposed to asking for a pushrod length without measuring and then finding out the hard way the length is not correct. This seems to be the method that many follow here rather then buy a $20 adjustable pushrod so the correct value can be obtained.

Last edited by vettenuts; Oct 18, 2009 at 07:38 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 10:47 AM
  #12  
XtraCajunSS's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 4
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Default

Although I sell many of the pushrod length checkers, I will tell anyone that you do not need one. I have done the math and the actual measurments for you. If you are dealing with stock rocker arms, the above calculations are correct. Anyone can achieve very accurate pushrod length measurments by using this method. As a matter of fact, it is much easier to get the correct pushrod length than with a length checker. The point is, you still need to make sure lifter IS on the base circle of the cam when checking by any method. Since most customers use pushrods that are only available in .025" increments, they will have to shoot for an acceptable preload range anyway. The method described above is very accurate and no special tools are needed if you have a known length pushrod within the common range for these engines.

Shane
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 01:58 AM
  #13  
Y2K SS's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Default

When XtraCajunSS (Shane) talks about this...

2. Using a known length pushrod (7.400" is a good start with stock rockers) run the rocker arm bolt down to zero lash. This is easily done with your fingers "wiggling" the rocker, the point at which the "slack" is just gone is zero lash.
Is he referring to the old "tighten down the rocker and spin the pushrod till theres resistance" thats how you get zero lash?? Cause in here sounds like he's talking about the rocker arm bolt.

Probably a dumb question but hey "theres never a dumb question". Haven't been on here for a long **** time nor have I been under my hood for awhile but changed out cam and lifters (huge *** job) on sat. and now I read up on this whole LS7 lifters deal and probably having to buy pushrods as well so I gotta check.

thanks
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 10:24 AM
  #14  
02*C5's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 303
From: Az
Default

If you soak your lifters you are going to get a wrong measurement. Why because the lifters tend to act more like solid lifters than hydraulic lifters when measuring. Set your lifters in no soaking, that way they are already collapsed. Then put your pushrod checker in place. Once you have one measurement do it again 3 times. If you get 2 out of 3 readings that are the same then use that length if you get 3 different reading then you are doing something wrong. I have done it like this just a couple of times since its not my first goat rope and I have never had issues.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 12:11 PM
  #15  
Bad Blu Formula's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,593
Likes: 5
From: Houston
Default

Originally Posted by 02*C5
If you soak your lifters you are going to get a wrong measurement. Why because the lifters tend to act more like solid lifters than hydraulic lifters when measuring. Set your lifters in no soaking, that way they are already collapsed. Then put your pushrod checker in place. Once you have one measurement do it again 3 times. If you get 2 out of 3 readings that are the same then use that length if you get 3 different reading then you are doing something wrong. I have done it like this just a couple of times since its not my first goat rope and I have never had issues.
By setting the lifters without soaking, then checking for preload, will you be doing all of this checking before bolting down the head? Then soak your lifters, set them in for real, and torque down the head after you get the measurements?
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 01:39 PM
  #16  
02*C5's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 303
From: Az
Default

Originally Posted by Bad Blu Formula
By setting the lifters without soaking, then checking for preload, will you be doing all of this checking before bolting down the head? Then soak your lifters, set them in for real, and torque down the head after you get the measurements?
You should get all your measurements before soaking, then presoak them over night and set them in your engine when you are getting ready to do the actual install.

What you are doing is getting the correct measurements before hand. Reason being when you set them in and have everything torqued down the lifter will bleed out correctly under mechanical pressure like they are supposed to and your meassurements will be on point. Now to reduce valve train clatter I would set the tq specs to the high end if your using the LS7 replacement lifters. That will make sure that there is as little valve train noise as possible.

Also make sure to us the correct lifters with correct valve train. As basic as it seems some people use lifters like the Comp "R" and try to use stock rockers, when you have a preload of .002 -.004 when you need adjustable rockers, and then they are pist off when they have issues with things like HP and minimal things like that LOL because they can't set the lash or the preload correctly with stock rockers.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 03:36 PM
  #17  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 89
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

These pushrod length threads turn into such a pissing match. I did it just like shane said with my lifters soaked, using an old compressed head gasket, and bolting the head down with a couple bolts. Mine is quiet as ever with no issues.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 11:40 PM
  #18  
02*C5's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 303
From: Az
Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
These pushrod length threads turn into such a pissing match. I did it just like shane said with my lifters soaked, using an old compressed head gasket, and bolting the head down with a couple bolts. Mine is quiet as ever with no issues.
Its not a pissing match. There are different ways that people do and have had success. How ever any one wishes to set their lash and preload is up to them, I do it how I have found it to work for me, I give my opinion and if some one has a problem with it then they can voice their opinion.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 04:41 AM
  #19  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

Originally Posted by XtraCajunSS
Although I sell many of the pushrod length checkers, I will tell anyone that you do not need one. I have done the math and the actual measurments for you. If you are dealing with stock rocker arms, the above calculations are correct. Anyone can achieve very accurate pushrod length measurments by using this method. As a matter of fact, it is much easier to get the correct pushrod length than with a length checker. The point is, you still need to make sure lifter IS on the base circle of the cam when checking by any method. Since most customers use pushrods that are only available in .025" increments, they will have to shoot for an acceptable preload range anyway. The method described above is very accurate and no special tools are needed if you have a known length pushrod within the common range for these engines.

Shane

Shane,

I had the opportunity to check my method and yours as I was doing a pushrod swap this past week. In the end my calculations and your method are pretty close and I have sorted out in my head why I didn't understand how you got the values you did. Here's what I did.

When tightening the bolt, I snugged with my fingers to take out the lash and then gently rotated until the rocker bottomed out. Any bolt rotation after this point is not adding preload to the lifter but rather is preloading the bolt to obtain final torque. What I found was I had approximately 5/8 turn until the bolt bottomed the rocker, which comes out to 0.031" of bolt movement or through the rocker ratio 0.049" at the pushrod. (The value you stated above) I then tightened to the final torque value of 22 lb-ft, which required approximately another 1/3 turn for a total rotation from zero lash of around 1 turn. My dial indicator values are 0.054 so the two methods and measured values are within thousanths of each other.

Hope this all makes sense.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 06:11 AM
  #20  
BRD-PREY's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 1
From: Lakeland, FL
Default I'm I missing the picture

Originally Posted by 02*C5
If you soak your lifters you are going to get a wrong measurement. Why because the lifters tend to act more like solid lifters than hydraulic lifters when measuring. Set your lifters in no soaking, that way they are already collapsed. .
Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding this.

I thought the lifters had a spring in them so that if thier is no oil is in them (not soaked) they are still not "collapsed". Now with that being said its is easy to drive the lifter cup (piston) down into the lifter by turning the rocker bolt or adjuster down and not notice it. The oil on the other hand provides the resistance for the cup to not move much during normal high speed valve train operation but allows the cup to move up and down within its acceptable range to maintain Zero Lash while running.

So the reason we set a specific lash is to ensure we have our pushrods in the middle (engineered operating range) of the cup travel when the engine is at normal operating temperature. The design from GM then allows the lifter cup enough movement to maintain zero lash when running too hot (not sure how much too hot) by the cup moving up in the lifter to ensure zero lash and then still being able to move down far enough when cold to prevent the cup from bottoming which in turn would keep the valve open when the cam was on the base circle.
The aluminum LS's need the cup further down when cold then the iron blocks. This is because the aluminum block grows more than Iron one. That way as the engine gets hot and expand the cup can keep moving up (being held there by hydraulic lock and the lifter will not be asserting any pressure on the valve but still have zero lash (which makes it quiet).
I imagine there is some engineering calculations that allow x amount of pressure acting on the bottom of the cup from oil pressure which miantains the zero lask but is not high enough to open the valve.

vettenuts I like your posts as they are detailed and theory/procedure based.
XtraCajunSS Your method I was sure would work and would end up being correct as it was developed with lots of experience but was born out of the Shade tree style. Nothing wrong with shade tree but if the theory isn't also there its hard to understand the cause and effect which could make troubleshooting problems difficult.

different car people are drawn to different style wrenching!

Well after I rambled on here a final thought a fellow LS Mech and I were discussing. There are a lot of Head/Cam swap people complaining about their car sounding like a sewing machine or louder valve train noise. I'm guessing they are erroring on the short side of the lash range and with the aluminum blocks its just not quite enough. I will concede that erroring too far the other way would soon leave you with a burned valve which is way worse.

Please correct my interperation of the hydraulic lifter operation if it wrong.
thanks Ed
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 AM.

story-0
6 Gifts Neither Your Dad Nor Grad Will Shove Into the 'Trinket Drawer'

Don't get dad new socks or a grill brush this year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-04 18:13:20


VIEW MORE
story-1
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

Slideshow: We take a close look at the ONE and Artidiag 800BT2 diagnostic tools from Topdon and the reasons to buy one over the other.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 11:05:11


VIEW MORE
story-2
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

Slideshow: The controversial Ferrari F6 swaps its original flat-12 for a Corvette Z06-derived LT4 V8 and sends power to four rear wheels through a custom-built drivetrain.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-26 18:23:54


VIEW MORE
story-3
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

Slideshow:These GM engines didn't just make huge power, they survived abuse, boost, track days, and six-digit mileage with a reputation for refusing to quit.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-21 16:45:27


VIEW MORE
story-4
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-6
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-9
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE