Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Too much compression with my heads and LQ9???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2009, 10:57 PM
  #21  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
=ZoomZ='s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Winter Springs
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yea , no im confused because i have 66cc heads and 6cc valve reliefs and my compression was to high for 93 @ 26 degrees of timing .
Old 11-27-2009, 09:37 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,707
Received 298 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MBC Racing
Is the calculator you are using on line?
I made sure i put in a negative value for the piston protruding out of the deck, calclulated the volume of the head gasket and still can't get 11.4

I got this using this calculator and these numbers:

http://www.ajdesigner.com/phpengine/...sion_ratio.php
Conversions:
BORE = 4 inch = 4 inch
STROKE = 3.622 inch = 3.622 inch
CCV = 60 centimeter^3 = 3.6614246456839 inch^3
HGV = .5740 inch^3 = 0.574 inch^3
PDV = -.125664 inch^3 = -0.125664 inch^3

Solution:
compression ratio (CR) = 12.074976068935

It is lower if I use PDV as a positive number.... but that would mean that it is in the hole. Like I said, not doubting, just trying to understand.

thanks
If you are going to use an online calculator use this one. http://golenengineservice.com/calc/calccr.htm. I did a little searching and this calculator has everything you need to make sure it gives correct information. Let me know how it works out for you.
Old 11-27-2009, 09:46 AM
  #23  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

there is one piece left out from alot of the CR calculators if you want a very true reading. that one does not use deck height, rod length, compression height, or height from top of piston to first ring land. all of those things will factor in as well.

this one is a little more inclusive, plus gives good info on piston speed and how elevation and boost will effect CR. http://www.zealautowerks.com/
Old 11-27-2009, 03:56 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Isolde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Smithfield, UT
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This is horrifying, stating a given static compression as being okay or not, without specifying your elevation above sea level. It makes a huge difference. When I moved up here from Florida, I was able to add more than a full ratio of static compression, and even so switch from premium unleaded to regular unleaded. The thing that remains constant is that 200 psi cranking compression is fairly safe on 91 octane. But for a given engine and a given cam, you'll need more static compression the higher you go to get 200 psi.
Old 11-27-2009, 03:58 PM
  #25  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

My V6 engine was 190 psi all stock.....i would not try to confuse CR with cranking compression.
Old 11-27-2009, 06:29 PM
  #26  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
=ZoomZ='s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Winter Springs
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John@Scoggin
My V6 engine was 190 psi all stock.....i would not try to confuse CR with cranking compression.
Thats why i ask the op for cam specs , because untill you have them , your pissin in the wind .

The bigger duration the cam is , the higher you can run static compression , the smaller duration the cam is the higher the dynamic is going to be which means you will have to drop static.
Old 11-27-2009, 06:37 PM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

i run 11.3:1 n 91 octane. higher scr allows for longer duration cams on pump gas. although i could have gone as high as 11.6:1 with current cam. but would have required to mill more than .030 from head. too much for oe heads
Old 11-27-2009, 07:02 PM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Chrome355z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 02*C5
Running the 11.44:1 is better for hp and for N2O also depending on the cam you need to make sure that your cam is a N2O friendly. While 100 N2O is considered a small shot I have been advised never run dry or wet with anything less than 100 octane if its bigger than a 50 shot due to detonation.

Good Luck
People run 200hp shots all the time on pump gas. It's all in the tune. Running higher octane is not that much different then pulling timing. Higher octane basically burns slower which in effect is the same as pulling timing. (generalization)
Old 11-27-2009, 07:35 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,707
Received 298 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chrome355z
People run 200hp shots all the time on pump gas. It's all in the tune. Running higher octane is not that much different then pulling timing. Higher octane basically burns slower which in effect is the same as pulling timing. (generalization)
Its true what you have stated but then you are pulling timing and adding timing and after a while it gets old IMO.
Old 11-27-2009, 11:18 PM
  #30  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MBC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02*C5
If you are going to use an online calculator use this one. http://golenengineservice.com/calc/calccr.htm. I did a little searching and this calculator has everything you need to make sure it gives correct information. Let me know how it works out for you.
Gives me the exact same number....12.0749
Now, if i put in +.01, I get 11.4 But since the piston is above the deck, it says to put in (-)

Looks like I am back in the 12:1 range......
Old 11-27-2009, 11:49 PM
  #31  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
=ZoomZ='s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Winter Springs
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MBC Racing
Looks like I am back in the 12:1 range......
Run a big *** cam and you will be fine ,, hehe

A 248/252 or so will drop your dynamic to tolerable levels.
Old 11-28-2009, 11:18 AM
  #32  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MBC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by =ZoomZ=
Run a big *** cam and you will be fine ,, hehe

A 248/252 or so will drop your dynamic to tolerable levels.
No valve reliefs won't like that duration much........
Old 11-28-2009, 11:23 AM
  #33  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MBC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If I use a stock MLS 6.0L gasket, it looks like I will be back in the 11.7 range.
That is if the thickness is .055.

Can someone please explain the quench stuff to me? I read about .o35, but why does GM use .055 and .058 gaskets stock on LS1's?

Thanks!
Old 11-28-2009, 11:37 AM
  #34  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Isolde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Smithfield, UT
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm pretty sure I know this one. In the early '80s, GM was building a lot of iron-headed SBCs with the pistons about 0.025" in the hole, and steel-shim head gaskets about 0.020" thick. But they were working on giving the Corvette aluminum heads. Steelshims didn't work, and MLS wasn't even an option. By the time they made a composite work the way they liked, it was 0.051" thick. Great, now they had a proven thing that would survive. It survived the warranty period, but it also survived into the days of our LSx.
GM realized that 0.076" quench was too much, yet they were stuck with 0.051" thick head gaskets, so they designed the LS to have the pistons out of the cylinders about 0.008" . And that gives 0.043", which is safe but not excessive.
Old 11-28-2009, 01:53 PM
  #35  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
=ZoomZ='s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Winter Springs
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MBC Racing
No valve reliefs won't like that duration much........
The duration will be fine but you will need like a .575/.578 lift
Old 11-28-2009, 02:03 PM
  #36  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MBC Racing
If I use a stock MLS 6.0L gasket, it looks like I will be back in the 11.7 range.
That is if the thickness is .055.

Can someone please explain the quench stuff to me? I read about .o35, but why does GM use .055 and .058 gaskets stock on LS1's?

Thanks!
My MLS 6.0 is .052 crushed.
Quench= Crushed gasket thickness - piston deck height
If your pistons are .010 out of hole, then with MLS 6.0 GM, your quench would be .042 (which is good)

And .050 lifts have almost nothing to do with PTV. Max lift occurs at or near BDC while contact with valve is at or near TDC (usualy 10* BTDC to 10* ATDC) <= Danger zone.
Old 11-28-2009, 07:02 PM
  #37  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MBC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
My MLS 6.0 is .052 crushed.
Quench= Crushed gasket thickness - piston deck height
If your pistons are .010 out of hole, then with MLS 6.0 GM, your quench would be .042 (which is good)

And .050 lifts have almost nothing to do with PTV. Max lift occurs at or near BDC while contact with valve is at or near TDC (usualy 10* BTDC to 10* ATDC) <= Danger zone.
I understand what quench is, just not finding out what exactly is the best number.... does it differ between lsx iron and alum blocks as far as what works better do to how heat affects things?

If my old 236/236 .550 cam is not bent, I am going to try to use it to determine piston to valve clearance. If you guys were guessing or know.... what is the biggest you think would work?

How about any of the sponsors that sell cams and gaskets and stuff..... what do you sell that will work form my application???
thanks
Old 11-28-2009, 08:13 PM
  #38  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
=ZoomZ='s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Winter Springs
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would put that .550 lift cam in , clay a piston and set one of the heads on the motor and roll it over by hand so that you know for sure exactly what your dealing with .

Any thing less and you wont know Exactly what your numbers are .
Old 11-28-2009, 10:43 PM
  #39  
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jax Beach, Florida
Posts: 9,146
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by =ZoomZ=
I would put that .550 lift cam in , clay a piston and set one of the heads on the motor and roll it over by hand so that you know for sure exactly what your dealing with .

Any thing less and you wont know Exactly what your numbers are .
Reread post 36 by PREDATOR-Z.
Old 11-28-2009, 11:07 PM
  #40  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
=ZoomZ='s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Winter Springs
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Beaflag VonRathburg
Reread post 36 by PREDATOR-Z.
I said Exactly .


Quick Reply: Too much compression with my heads and LQ9???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 PM.