Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cam help v2 v3 ms3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2010, 07:37 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
getsum27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Cam help v2 v3 ms3

ok well, long story short ive got a stock bottom end and i am getting ready to order my prc stage 2.5 5.3l heads and a cam package......

my cam choice was the 233/239
i called tsp and the guy told me that that cam was a nitrous cam and if i just wanted a stout N/A motor not to get it because i could make better power with another cam

so.. now im stuck on one of these 3 cams.
Torquer v2
Torquer v3
MS3
there are things i like and dislike about all 3 so what do you guys think?
what do you have??? hows the driveability?? what kinda power did your setup make?? What times does it run???
Old 01-06-2010, 07:59 PM
  #2  
HTX
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
HTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

if you are comfortable going with the high lift of the trqr3 then why not consider the MS4 as an option?
Old 01-06-2010, 08:12 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
getsum27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well ive heard that ms4 has clearance issues
i dont really like the high lift of the v3 what i like about it is i hear it is suppose to make more torque down low than a v2 and more power all the way up to redline
dont know if its true or not but thats why im here asking for help
Old 01-06-2010, 08:13 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
getsum27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

oh i heard that you have to change valve springs alot when using the v3 is that the same with the ms3 and v2 as well or is it because of the high lift
Old 01-06-2010, 10:49 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

plp say that because of the high lift. If you get good double springs, and dont beat the **** outta it on daily basis, you should be ok for some good mileage. I have a T3 waiting because of the good results I've seen over here; seems that 420-450rwhp is easy with strong midrange and ok for DD.
Old 01-06-2010, 10:57 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
jpajkos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a Torquer 3 right now and I daily drove it for a year. The lift didn't scare me one bit. Not one thing wrong with it. Car made great power 443.7 through a stalled auto and a set of Stage 2 64cc Patriots. I will be doing a set of PRC 215s milled to 59cc and a Tsunami cam here soon.
Old 01-06-2010, 11:15 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
ABQ99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I run the Tv3 and love it. I have a nice flat torque curve and good power. I have had it for over a year maybe close to 2 years I'm not sure. I don't drive the car all the time now but I did when I first got it and it drive fine. Springs are still good. You can see what I put down in my sig. That is through cats as well, with no cats and a cut out I'm sure I would pick some more power.
Old 01-07-2010, 10:11 AM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (21)
 
396D1SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: lakeland, fl
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am running the V3 and I am very pleased with it. The low end and midrange is awesome
Old 01-07-2010, 12:41 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
 
antonio84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: midland, Tx
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know a couple guys that have the 5.3 2.5 stage with ms3 combo, and both have had great results
Old 01-07-2010, 02:25 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
NC98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would get 243 PRC stage 2s and MS4 and get TSP to sink the valves for additional clearance.
Old 01-07-2010, 02:32 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
getsum27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i kinda dont wanna go with the ms4
i would go as big as the ms3 or the v3
keep coming with the info guys thanks
Old 01-07-2010, 02:56 PM
  #12  
Staging Lane
 
willystyle438's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Highlands, Tx.
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the PRC 2.5 5.3l heads and V2 with LS6 intake on a 2000 Z28 M6. I put down 408RW. I also have 135,000 miles on the bottom end. If I had it to do again, I would go with the 243 heads worked on. JMO
Old 01-07-2010, 03:20 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
NC98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by getsum27
i kinda dont wanna go with the ms4
i would go as big as the ms3 or the v3
keep coming with the info guys thanks
The MS4 has better lowend midrange than a MS3 and about the same lift as the TV3. Mines a blast to drive around town.

Cam help  v2 v3 ms3-paul2.jpg



Quick Reply: Cam help v2 v3 ms3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 AM.