Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fastest Ramp & Highest Spring Pressure for Stock Lifters?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2003, 03:22 PM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default Fastest Ramp & Highest Spring Pressure for Stock Lifters?

Fastest Ramp & Highest Spring Pressure for Stock Lifters?

When do you need to say when with the stock lifters?

How much spring pressure?

Fastest ramp rate? XE, TR, MMS, XE-R, or mild Solid etc?

Is the 215 solid roller based intake lobe on a TR Old Man cam too much for stock lifters?

Is a 230 XE-R too much?

Is a 236 XE-R too much?

Oil weight ie 5w-30 vs 10w-30 vs 10w-40 have any effect on lifter collaspe?

I need help with this as my Camaro's engine is coming apart and I can upgrade to what's needed. The MAX cam I'd ever consider is a TSP 231/236 but a MMS229v2.1 is probably what I'll go with.

Thanks
Old 12-21-2003, 06:29 PM
  #2  
wrencher
iTrader: (2)
 
wrencher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'll make it simple, if you pull the heads replace the lifters.
To much to risk not to replace them.
Old 12-21-2003, 07:17 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

Wrencher,

It's not quite that simple of a question.

At what point are the stock lifters beyond their limits?

Doesn't matter if they are used stock or new stock ones, if they can't handle an XE-R lobe and 300 pounds of spring pressure.
Old 12-21-2003, 08:28 PM
  #4  
wrencher
iTrader: (2)
 
wrencher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If I were to replace lifters I wouldn't use stockers.
I've seen some with 580 lift cams w/stockers & there not a quiet valvetrain.
I would go comp R's or crane's.
I dont think you question has a cut & dry answer like a valve springs limitations do.
Old 12-21-2003, 08:32 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

Your probably right no cut & dry answer...my valve train is noisy..but seems ok...lifters aren't collasping etc...it was checked.

However, I may go with bigger XE-R ish cam on my new project and I don't want over do it on cam selection for the stock lifter.

Anyone else care to chime in?
Old 12-22-2003, 10:19 AM
  #6  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'm running a TR236 with out any issues so far. About 1500-2000 miles on the cam. Stock heads and other internals. I spun it to 7k a couple times on the dyno and have my shift light set at 6500.

236/230 .599/.573 112
Old 12-23-2003, 10:42 AM
  #7  
Staging Lane
 
SNW Vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Clemente, CA
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here is some info from old threads. Steve
Max Seat Pressure for Stock Lifters
Lou at LG said:
"Comp 987s are the MAX (almost too much) spring you want to run on stock lifters. Anything above that (ex: Comp 977) WILL need a high performance (ex: Comp R) lifter."

"987s have a 130lb closed seat pressure and a 325 open pressure.
150 with 1.7s and 140 with 1.8s will tend to bleed down one or more of the lifters resulting in a lot of individual lifter noise. I’ve done a lot of testing with too-stiff K-motion spring. Chris"




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 AM.