Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

how restrictive is the LS6 induction w/ MAF + SLP lid?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2010, 07:55 AM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default how restrictive is the LS6 induction w/ MAF + SLP lid?

I was lookin at doin an 85mm lid and maf. I'm running heads and cam and was wondering how restrictive my setup is. I know I could use a FAST intake, but I just don't have the money for that right now.

LS6 p+p'd heads
LS6 intake
Stock MAF
SLP lid.
Old 03-05-2010, 07:59 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
JarrettL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You should see some gains but they won't be substantial. The LS6 intake is fine for what you've listed. But, in order to provide you with a more clear answer I suppose people are going to want to know what your ultimate plans are for the car and, at the risk of sounding like a Cobra owner, what power figure you'd like to hit.
Old 03-05-2010, 08:06 AM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^ Over the next couple years, I'm going to see what this cam is ultimately capable of. TF Heads and a FAST 92 intake, UDP and EWP. I KNOW it will squeak out 500hp, but I'm going to have to wait on that ($$.) I know the lid and MAF will be good supporting mods for the FAST intake anyway. Unless there is a bigger MAF/Lid I will need with the FAST. I'll do SD tune when/if the time comes.

I just want to throw the best heads at it and see what it makes. And take some paricitic drive loss away from the front of the engine.

I don't know what the ultimate plans are for the car. I've had it for seven years and It's mostly just a street machine with the occasional trip to the track.
Old 03-05-2010, 08:16 AM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ahhhh Crap! I thought I posted this in the external section... Mods, move this at will.. Thank you..
Old 03-05-2010, 12:54 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
JarrettL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well the large intake/throttle body makes the MAF a little more worthwhile. There are some that would argue that the large bore throttle bodies (92 or even 102mm) would require a 100mm MAF or a SD tune but you're really not going to peg the flow potential of your desired setup even with crazy heads on a 346ci. bottom end.
Old 03-05-2010, 05:57 PM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^ I've never thought of it that way.. Very interesting POV..




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 PM.