PP 5.3/TSP228R dyno #'s
#21
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm glad to see your great results! Have them change your numbers to SAE corrected and add some smoothing, and that will get you some comparable numbers. You'll should easily still have 400+ RWHP through an A4, and that's doing great! The 228R is a great all-around cam.
Congrats on the results, and let us know if you have any questions. We're here to help!
Jason
Texas Speed & Performance
Congrats on the results, and let us know if you have any questions. We're here to help!
Jason
Texas Speed & Performance
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#22
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Warsaw, Va
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
good numbers from the PP's... like most said you will probably still have over 400
but who cares about dynos.. my TEA1.5's pulled 399.9 with the 224/224 .563 114 cam, but if I cant run sub 11.2's that dont mean squat to me
good numbers bro.... I'd love to go with a bigger cam also, but i'm to happy with my idle and so forth with the lil 224 cam right now
but who cares about dynos.. my TEA1.5's pulled 399.9 with the 224/224 .563 114 cam, but if I cant run sub 11.2's that dont mean squat to me
good numbers bro.... I'd love to go with a bigger cam also, but i'm to happy with my idle and so forth with the lil 224 cam right now
#23
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes I am glad to see the numbers, but I would rather have track times. The car needs more convertor now. I think I can run some low 7 sec 1/8 mile #'s if I had a different convertor. It ran a 7.61 @96 with a 1.78 60 ft. The sixty ft is killing me. Oh well, more money.
#24
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Iowa
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Damn man.. You could run low 7's for sure with that 96 mph... Nice! ![Cheers!!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cheers.gif)
![Cheers!!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cheers.gif)
Originally Posted by 00SS4780
Yes I am glad to see the numbers, but I would rather have track times. The car needs more convertor now. I think I can run some low 7 sec 1/8 mile #'s if I had a different convertor. It ran a 7.61 @96 with a 1.78 60 ft. The sixty ft is killing me. Oh well, more money.
#26
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: "Tr"Asheville
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hey steve, let me know when you decide to go to shadyside if you do, my heads will be in tommorow(friday) and will have my car back on the street saturday morning. I'd like to go down there as well.
-Sly
-Sly