Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help / input for New springs/ret/locks on LS1 for 1.8 RRs....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2010, 05:37 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Nastyc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Help / input for New springs/ret/locks on LS1 for 1.8 RRs....

Few questions. Are the stock retainers ok to reuse? Stock locks ok to reuse? have 125k miles on the stock valve train. Im installing crane 1.8 rrs and am upgrading to 26918 comp beehives. Should I reuse the stock components with them?
Old 04-26-2010, 05:42 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,707
Received 298 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

Why r you going with 1.8 rockers?
Old 04-26-2010, 05:46 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Nastyc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

for some extra ponies
Old 04-26-2010, 05:47 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Nastyc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

and cuz i wanted to freshen the valve springs anyways motor is lazy above 4500
Old 04-26-2010, 10:28 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Nastyc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

ok to re-use stock retainers and locks on 26918s ????
Old 04-26-2010, 10:30 PM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nastyc4
for some extra ponies
if your looking for "extra ponies" your looking in the wrong place....
Old 04-26-2010, 11:12 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,707
Received 298 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bww3588
if your looking for "extra ponies" your looking in the wrong place....
my point exactly you are going to use a 1.8 rocker ratio on a cam that is probably ground for a 1.7 rocker ratio. also you are probably using stock heads which have not been prepped to support an market rockers and are not engineered to work with a 1.8 rocker ratio.

Your "looking for love in all the wrong places..."
Old 04-26-2010, 11:43 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

ahhh Waylon Jennings.....good times good times.
Old 04-27-2010, 04:43 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nastyc4
ok to re-use stock retainers and locks on 26918s ????
Yes. Depending on your total lift and installed height you may want to shim them to a higher seat value.
Old 04-27-2010, 08:14 AM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vettenuts
Yes. Depending on your total lift and installed height you may want to shim them to a higher seat value.
You don't shim the retainers. You shim the spring pocket.
Old 04-27-2010, 03:08 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Nastyc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 02*C5
my point exactly you are going to use a 1.8 rocker ratio on a cam that is probably ground for a 1.7 rocker ratio. also you are probably using stock heads which have not been prepped to support an market rockers and are not engineered to work with a 1.8 rocker ratio.

Your "looking for love in all the wrong places..."

I'm using a 1.8 Rocker ratio because its the equivalent of an extremely tiny cam and its proven to produce a little hp. The rockers were used and cheap and my valve springs needed refreshing anyways woth 125k miles on the clock. I figured if I'm going in there I may as well throw rockers on with new springs and pushrods.

Yes I am using stock heads and yes I believe the stock cam is ground for a 1.7 stock rocker. The Crane Rockers however ARE designed to be a bolt on both of those and produce a little hp for those who don't want to go into the motor. And that would be me. Quotes for Cam installs are absolutely rediculous up here in Canada with all the greedy shoppes hoping to make a buck off an idiot with an ls1. I don't plan to fall into that category.
I don't want to tear into the motor just yet so bolt ons are good enough for me.

Rockers = $220
SPrings/pushrods = $210
Install : Free (me)

Cam quote installed from 2 local shoppes : $2700, $3200 . Ask me again why I'm doing rockers??

Last edited by Nastyc4; 04-27-2010 at 03:14 PM.
Old 04-27-2010, 04:58 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
LS1GMCTruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl.
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I like my Crane Gold 1.8's on my stock 2001 LS1. But...via my research for a future LS6, or "hot cam", I believe I have to somehow go back to 1.7 rockers.
Old 04-27-2010, 06:17 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Nastyc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by LS1GMCTruck
I like my Crane Gold 1.8's on my stock 2001 LS1. But...via my research for a future LS6, or "hot cam", I believe I have to somehow go back to 1.7 rockers.
Cool,

did you reuse locks and retainers? what springs did you go with?
Old 04-27-2010, 07:21 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bww3588
You don't shim the retainers. You shim the spring pocket.
I know that and assume the OP does as well.
Old 04-27-2010, 08:25 PM
  #15  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vettenuts
I know that and assume the OP does as well.
Idk. He thinks he is gonna get power out of 1.8 rockers...
Old 04-27-2010, 08:29 PM
  #16  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nastyc4
I'm using a 1.8 Rocker ratio because its the equivalent of an extremely tiny cam and its proven to produce a little hp. The rockers were used and cheap and my valve springs needed refreshing anyways woth 125k miles on the clock. I figured if I'm going in there I may as well throw rockers on with new springs and pushrods.

Yes I am using stock heads and yes I believe the stock cam is ground for a 1.7 stock rocker. The Crane Rockers however ARE designed to be a bolt on both of those and produce a little hp for those who don't want to go into the motor. And that would be me. Quotes for Cam installs are absolutely rediculous up here in Canada with all the greedy shoppes hoping to make a buck off an idiot with an ls1. I don't plan to fall into that category.
I don't want to tear into the motor just yet so bolt ons are good enough for me.

Rockers = $220
SPrings/pushrods = $210
Install : Free (me)

Cam quote installed from 2 local shoppes : $2700, $3200 . Ask me again why I'm doing rockers??
The problem here is that the extra maybe 2-3 hp you will gain is not worth all the downfalls of thoes rockers. A different cam is not just lift. Its duration as well. All your doing is increasing lift by a little bit and increasing valve speed.
Old 04-27-2010, 10:24 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Nastyc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I'm pretty sure theres more than 2-3 hp in them or at least thats what i am convinced of. Crane claims 15-20 which is probably on the high side but there are numerous people showing some gains when dynoed. Either that or they are trying to make themselves feel better.

Increasing lift and valve speed... isn't that what aftermarket cams do? if anything higher lift rockers create less stress on the valvetrain than bigger cams do. the increase in speed etc are also why crane calls for stiffer valvesprings which was on my list since I bought the car anyways.
Old 04-27-2010, 10:40 PM
  #18  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

aftermarket cams also increase duration, which means a cam with a lower duration will have a quicker valve speed because it opens later and closes sooner, but still has to acheive the desired lift, which is higher with 1.8 rockers. you are spreading the same lift over a longer period of time which the lifter is off the basecircle and on the lobe itself with a longer duration cam.

as for the "crane claims 15-20 hp..." there is a reason crane went out of business.

not that that matters, because comp claims the same gains with their 1.52 roller rockers for the LT1. but you have to remember, these companies are in business to make money. what happens is this. they make a baseline dyno run on a stock engine, then change the rockers and dyno it again and pick up 15 hp. but what they dont tell you is " well we changed the cam to take advantage of the 1.8 rockers."
Old 04-27-2010, 10:40 PM
  #19  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

aftermarket cams also increase duration, which means a cam with a lower duration will have a quicker valve speed because it opens later and closes sooner, but still has to acheive the desired lift, which is higher with 1.8 rockers. you are spreading the same lift over a longer period of time which the lifter is off the basecircle and on the lobe itself with a longer duration cam.

as for the "crane claims 15-20 hp..." there is a reason crane went out of business.

not that that matters, because comp claims the same gains with their 1.52 roller rockers for the LT1. but you have to remember, these companies are in business to make money. what happens is this. they make a baseline dyno run on a stock engine, then change the rockers and dyno it again and pick up 15 hp. but what they dont tell you is " well we changed the cam to take advantage of the 1.8 rockers."
Old 04-27-2010, 10:52 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Nastyc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Remember I'm not making the argument of Cam vs Rocker ratio. Lets look at the cost/hp ratio between my options.

Cam (something mild and streetable) say 50 hp max. $54 / hp

10 hp with rockers = $40/hp

win in my book if it gains more than 6 hp.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 AM.