Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

AFR205 or PP 243?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2010, 08:05 AM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ta-stanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lake Of the Ozarks, MO.
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default AFR205 or PP 243?

Lets start with assuming money is not the deciding factor!!
With my size cam (228-230 588-590 112)what would be the better choice AFR205's or PP 243's and why?
Remember this car is a DD and is driven everyday!!
Thanks
Old 05-01-2010, 08:15 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I am on my second set of heads and went with the AFR's (which are what I had originally wanted). I like the double quench pad and with a Cometic gasket the tuner could introduce plenty of timing without any KR. He found he could add timing to the point where there was no gain and so backed off for a very safe street tune. I also liked the thicker deck. The AFR's, assuming equal milling, provide more valve drop that could mean the difference between flycutting and not flycutting. AFR has also shown itself to stand behind their product. Not trying to pimp the AFR's, just providing the logic I went through when I made my selection.

Last edited by vettenuts; 05-01-2010 at 01:40 PM.
Old 05-01-2010, 08:21 AM
  #3  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
ta-stanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lake Of the Ozarks, MO.
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yeah I was going to send a set of 243 to AFI and have them PP for about $1000 bucks. So before I do that I wanna pick a few brains:>
Old 05-01-2010, 09:07 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

If you have the money AFR's all day long. They don't get much better and youll never have to worry about maxing them out unless you go nuts. The 243s will hit a barrier way before the AFR's.
Old 05-01-2010, 09:44 AM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
pharmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by itsslow98
If you have the money AFR's all day long. They don't get much better and youll never have to worry about maxing them out unless you go nuts. The 243s will hit a barrier way before the AFR's.
I don't know that I would say WAY before...there are some 243's that are making very nice power, while saving him nearly enough to add a FAST. 243's + FAST to me, would pretty much equal AFR + LS6 intake. Personally if I were going ported 243's, I'd take a hard look at Advanced Induction.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-494-rwhp.html

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...st-2009-a.html

Just my $0.02, especially since this is a daily driver type street car and I'm sure you don't want to sink a butt load of $$ into it.
Old 05-01-2010, 10:01 AM
  #6  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Paint_It_Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chi-town West Burbs
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

AI sure does make some nice dyno numbers.
Old 05-01-2010, 01:20 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
 
johnster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: jackson tn
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

if money has nothing to do with it i would go afr or tfs 215
Old 05-01-2010, 01:34 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
BriancWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Garage
Posts: 3,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I am another very satisfied AFR owner. Like Vettenuts stated, AFR offers some nice benefits that a stock casting just doesn't have.

Another thing about the AFRs performance wise, is the part throttle sotp feel and throttle response that they give you due to the high air speed of the 205 runner. You may have a ported stock casting that can put up similar peak numbers, but the power on the street when just driving around will not feel as peppy as the AFRs due to the smaller intake runner design. It's not always about volume, air speed plays a major role.

With all that said, I ran my AFRs with a 228/230 on a 114 and ran 11.20s@122 at nearly full weight. This was also with an LS6 intake and -16rwhp tune for nitrous. Never got the chance to try and squeeze the car into the 10s due to #7 letting go.
Old 05-01-2010, 06:25 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
GTO1_OHIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne Beach FL
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I've been running AFR 205s with a 224/228 .600 .600 on a 114+4 but I just had Tony port them along with my Fast intake. Also switched to a 227/230 .613 .591 on a 113+2. Should have some new numbers this week.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.