Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.3l with 4.8l pistons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2010 | 11:24 AM
  #21  
hcb1700's Avatar
TECH Regular
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
From: Oakland, California
Default

Hey 70TWO NOVA, did you use the stock 5.3 connecting rods?
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 01:03 PM
  #22  
chevybowtie's Avatar
Launching!
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 1
From: Eagle River, AK
Default

Is this not just a l33. L33 have flat top pistons. I believe this is what GM did to raise the horsepower in this motors.
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 06:34 PM
  #23  
70TWO NOVA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
Default

yes, I used the stock 5.3l rods, I heard about this mod from Camaro Performers Mag. They built a 5.3 for their project Track Rat and used the 4.8l pistons in it. With my setup I should have around 9.75:1 comp. You would have more if you use the stock 5.3 heads. (im using a set of 317 heads milled .030= 66cc)
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 06:52 PM
  #24  
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,146
Likes: 3
From: Jax Beach, Florida
Default

I don't know how much those pistons cost, but why not just have the engine honed to 3.89x and install OEM LS1 pistons and rods? The cost of rods and pistons should be almost nothing and with the hone you know you will have a proper ring seal. You'll also end up with 346ish cubic inches. The cost should be comparable and if not only slightly more for the LS1 piston setup that'll make more power.
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 06:54 PM
  #25  
70TWO NOVA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
Default

Yeah your right, im sure you could do it for less. I paid $176 for the 4.8 pistons and $35 to have them put on the old rods. Ive see LS1 pistons and rods for like 40 bucks. But I dont know what a bore and hone would cost to get them in there. I just went with the 4.8s because it was something different and I wanted to keep it a 5.3l.
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 07:53 PM
  #26  
ls1ya's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 366
Likes: 2
From: L.A.
Default

this is too cool i'm thinking of picking up a 70-73 camaro and a 5.3l build like this or the 5.3 with 5.7 pistons and rods would do nice work for that.
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 08:13 PM
  #27  
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,146
Likes: 3
From: Jax Beach, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by 70TWO NOVA
Yeah your right, im sure you could do it for less. I paid $176 for the 4.8 pistons and $35 to have them put on the old rods. Ive see LS1 pistons and rods for like 40 bucks. But I dont know what a bore and hone would cost to get them in there. I just went with the 4.8s because it was something different and I wanted to keep it a 5.3l.
I know around here because you are removing so much material from the cylinders that they charge for two hones. It comes out to being right around $200 for the finish hone to piston size. My friend has done quite a few of them this way. He had a way of picking up 5.3 engines with problems for extremely cheap. He's done a lot of cool swaps with them S10, 300zx, mustangs, a 240sx, but all were bored to 3.89x with LS1 pistons.
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 08:20 PM
  #28  
5.3LJimmy's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 1
From: Napoleonville, LA
Default

Originally Posted by davidws6
70 two Nova, What pistons did you go with ?

I've searched for forged 4.8 pistons = nodda ?
Wiseco is now making forged pistons for the 5.3/4.8. Try checking with them.
Reply
Old May 16, 2010 | 09:23 PM
  #29  
70TWO NOVA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by 5.3LJimmy
Wiseco is now making forged pistons for the 5.3/4.8. Try checking with them.
part #?....
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 10:54 AM
  #30  
5.3LJimmy's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 1
From: Napoleonville, LA
Default

K474M96 - 3.78 Bore/3.622 Stroke/6.098 Rod/Flat Top w/2.2cc valve relief

K474M965 - 3.80 Bore/3.622 Stroke/6.125 Rod/Flat Top w/2.2cc valve relief

K473M96 - 3.78 Bore/4.00 Stroke/6.098 Rod/7cc Dish w/ valve relief

K473M965 - 3.80 Bore/4.00 Stroke/6.125 Rod/7cc Dish w/ valve relief
Reply
Old May 29, 2014 | 01:57 PM
  #31  
atrevi19's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

Did this build end up working good for you? I'm planning on doing this because I broke a piston on my 4.8 and have a 5.3 with low compression. Just wondering if it worked so I can just buy the pistons and use the crank and rods from the 5.3
Reply
Old May 29, 2014 | 05:30 PM
  #32  
70TWO NOVA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by atrevi19
Did this build end up working good for you? I'm planning on doing this because I broke a piston on my 4.8 and have a 5.3 with low compression. Just wondering if it worked so I can just buy the pistons and use the crank and rods from the 5.3

It worked great, car put down 311 hp to the ground on a chassis dyno through a 4L60E so we think the engine is makeing around 375hp or so.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2018 | 04:33 PM
  #33  
dawgs74's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 661
Likes: 91
From: S.F. East bay
Default

Originally Posted by vannatta20
Try putting the 4.8 pistons on the drivers side then install the 5.3 pistons on the passenger side. This should balance well if my math is correct. Just make sure to mill the head with 5.3 pistons to even out the compression ratio.
pleeze tell me you are joking......some idiot is really gonna do that now. Lol
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2018 | 07:53 PM
  #34  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,285
Likes: 3,613
From: Central Cal.
Default

Read the WHOLE thread next time. Go down a few posts.
Vannatta says, "Just teasing, my buddy".
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2018 | 08:20 PM
  #35  
axld's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: florida
Default

as far as balancing. check the bob weight for a 4.8 vs 5.3vs 6.0, but then I have put together a butt load of gen 1 without balancing.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2018 | 06:36 AM
  #36  
B52bombardier1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 264
From: Bossier City, Louisiana
Default

Yea, I know - this is an old thread. The big trouble I see with using these 5.3 liter truck motors in a car is the 5.3 liter oil pan. It hangs down a lot.Typically, maybe two inches or so. Yes, the 5.3 liter engines are abundant and cheap but you do need to budget for a different oil pan. Otherwise, you are going to leave your engine oil on the street someday and quickly weld up the internal parts of your engine into a pasty grey metallic pulp.

I had to go with the Holley 302-2 pan on my El Camino to avoid this problem.

Rick
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2018 | 03:20 PM
  #37  
dawgs74's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 661
Likes: 91
From: S.F. East bay
Default

Originally Posted by B52bombardier1
Yea, I know - this is an old thread. The big trouble I see with using these 5.3 liter truck motors in a car is the 5.3 liter oil pan. It hangs down a lot.Typically, maybe two inches or so. Yes, the 5.3 liter engines are abundant and cheap but you do need to budget for a different oil pan. Otherwise, you are going to leave your engine oil on the street someday and quickly weld up the internal parts of your engine into a pasty grey metallic pulp.

I had to go with the Holley 302-2 pan on my El Camino to avoid this problem.

Rick
sometimes it's the little things that get ya caught up.........thousands into an ls swap but too cheap to get the right pan,might wanna cancel that 102mm throttle body and get the right pan, plan on running before running fast....
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2018 | 12:12 PM
  #38  
cookseyb's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 926
Likes: 18
From: Central Texas
Default

Speed way has LS1 pan kits for 200 bucks....
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2018 | 11:47 AM
  #39  
70TWO NOVA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
Default

I used an Fbody pan in the 80 camaro this motor went in. It worked great
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2018 | 12:14 AM
  #40  
dawgs74's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 661
Likes: 91
From: S.F. East bay
Default

Originally Posted by Beaflag VonRathburg
I don't know how much those pistons cost, but why not just have the engine honed to 3.89x and install OEM LS1 pistons and rods? The cost of rods and pistons should be almost nothing and with the hone you know you will have a proper ring seal. You'll also end up with 346ish cubic inches. The cost should be comparable and if not only slightly more for the LS1 piston setup that'll make more power.
what if you put ls1 pistons on a 4.8 crank and rods , will it work and what would it displace?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.