Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.3l with 4.8l pistons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2018, 10:53 AM
  #41  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
omc8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 1,539
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dawgs74
what if you put ls1 pistons on a 4.8 crank and rods , will it work and what would it displace?
Yeah it be a 312 or 5.1
Old 03-23-2018, 11:26 AM
  #42  
TECH Fanatic
 
MuhThugga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wilmington, De
Posts: 1,691
Received 244 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by B52bombardier1
Yea, I know - this is an old thread. The big trouble I see with using these 5.3 liter truck motors in a car is the 5.3 liter oil pan. It hangs down a lot.Typically, maybe two inches or so. Yes, the 5.3 liter engines are abundant and cheap but you do need to budget for a different oil pan. Otherwise, you are going to leave your engine oil on the street someday and quickly weld up the internal parts of your engine into a pasty grey metallic pulp.

I had to go with the Holley 302-2 pan on my El Camino to avoid this problem.

Rick
Skid plates also work.
Old 03-23-2018, 04:20 PM
  #43  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,087
Received 3,094 Likes on 2,410 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by B52bombardier1
Yea, I know - this is an old thread. The big trouble I see with using these 5.3 liter truck motors in a car is the 5.3 liter oil pan. It hangs down a lot.Typically, maybe two inches or so. Yes, the 5.3 liter engines are abundant and cheap but you do need to budget for a different oil pan. Otherwise, you are going to leave your engine oil on the street someday and quickly weld up the internal parts of your engine into a pasty grey metallic pulp.

I had to go with the Holley 302-2 pan on my El Camino to avoid this problem.

Rick
Depending on the swap, there might be a Camaro/Corvette/CTS-V/GTO pan that might fit. You don't always need to go aftermarket.
Old 03-29-2018, 04:33 PM
  #44  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dawgs74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Antioch ca
Posts: 564
Received 61 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 70TWO NOVA
It worked great, car put down 311 hp to the ground on a chassis dyno through a 4L60E so we think the engine is makeing around 375hp or so.
what cam grind are you running
Old 07-02-2019, 08:09 AM
  #45  
Teching In
 
mwoods35670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 4.8 compression height

Originally Posted by bww3588
they will stick out of the hole. the compression depth is different for the shorter stroke of the 5.3

the compression depth of the 4.8 piston is 1.498 and the compression depth of the 5.3 piston is 1.328 ish.
4.8 compression height

Last edited by mwoods35670; 07-02-2019 at 08:10 AM. Reason: Messed up
Old 07-02-2019, 08:22 AM
  #46  
Teching In
 
mwoods35670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 4.8 compression height

Originally Posted by vannatta20
Try putting the 4.8 pistons on the drivers side then install the 5.3 pistons on the passenger side. This should balance well if my math is correct. Just make sure to mill the head with 5.3 pistons to even out the compression ratio.
You can put 4.8 flat tops in without a balance issue with stock pistons. There is really no difference in weight. The tops are no thicker, just shaped different. I used eBay specials. $116 shipped with rings. Worked perfect.but they were above deck maybe. .010 but can't remember exactly. Used a stock c5 vette Cam. .505 lift $50
Edelbrock duel plane and 670 Holley. It runs like a raped ape.only downside is you need at least good 93 octane.unless you pull timing and works fine.



Quick Reply: 5.3l with 4.8l pistons



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.