Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

are 2.08 valves to large for a stock bore ls1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-10-2010, 06:04 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
bigfatls6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default are 2.08 valves to large for a stock bore ls1?

IM looking for a set of heads to use on my stock bottom end ls6 and was wondering if a 208 valve would be too large for the stock ls6 bore? I know its pushing it but would the 208 valves cause problems?
Old 08-10-2010, 06:50 PM
  #2  
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Sales4@Texas-Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Yes the 2.08" valve is a little large for a stock cube motor. Not only will it cut p to v drastically just because of size, but it will also kill low end power because of how big it is. The stock motor just can't utilize a valve that big.
The following users liked this post:
Homer_Simpson (01-17-2022)
Old 08-10-2010, 06:55 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,710
Received 297 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

2.02/1.60 the largest you can go with stock LS1/LS6 bore
Old 08-10-2010, 06:57 PM
  #4  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Ive run 2.08s in a stock 5.7L before, although it was in an set of ETP 225cc heads that have a rolled valve angle. They made great power.....
Old 08-10-2010, 07:41 PM
  #5  
9 Second Club
 
butler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am running afr 225's with the 2.08 valves with no issues. It's in a 383 3.905 bore. ms3 cam. plenty of clearance though low end torque may suffer I can't tell. 470 rwhp through an auto with 4200 stall.
Old 08-10-2010, 11:20 PM
  #6  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Any of the best head porters will tell you a 2.08 is too big for a 346ci. In most cases the job can get done with stock valves. I've made 460rwhp with stock valves before.
Old 11-08-2012, 09:44 PM
  #7  
Teching In
 
QCK57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So guys they do fit 2.08 in 346ci set up.
However with a high lift combo you will have clearance issues?


The issue is low down power dramatically effected?
Old 11-08-2012, 09:57 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
batboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: middle of nowhere, Kansas
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Even if you do squeeze 2.08" valves in there, there would be so much valve shrouding it would not be worth it.

Originally Posted by 02*C5
2.02/1.60 the largest you can go with stock LS1/LS6 bore
That's not true. Trick Flow 215 heads are designed for LS1 bore and they have 2.04" intake valves.
Old 11-09-2012, 10:02 AM
  #9  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by QCK57
So guys they do fit 2.08 in 346ci set up.
However with a high lift combo you will have clearance issues?


The issue is low down power dramatically effected?
Lift has very little to do with the piston to valve clearance. The low lift duration numbers are far more important, along with lobe centerlines.

As stated, a 2.08" valve, while it will clear the bore, will be severely shrouded on a 3.898-3.908" bore.
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Old 11-09-2012, 10:30 AM
  #10  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

2.02 is not the biggest you can fit.

Most aftermarket heads have larger valves than this... including the AFR 225 small bore.

Most ported heads use a 2.04" or 2.055" valve for the stock bore LS1. But you can make great power with the stock 2.00" valve as Ai generally takes this approach.

Stock valves are lighter than standard stainless aftermarket and that makes valve control a little easier. With a 2.08" valve, you have a heavy valve that requires more spring to control. And more spring puts more stress on guides, pushrods, and lifters.

Piston-to-valve clearance is the issue as well as shrouding as has been said before.

You can run it, but you better check clearance before you run it.
Old 11-09-2012, 10:35 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
wildcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Western PA
Posts: 2,501
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I would think those monster valves would kill you intake port velocity which costs power.
Old 11-09-2012, 01:51 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
yonerhottlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sacramento Ca
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I personally wouldn't run anything over a 2.04 intake valve with the standard LS1 bore.
Old 11-09-2012, 02:28 PM
  #13  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bigfatls6
IM looking for a set of heads to use on my stock bottom end ls6 and was wondering if a 208 valve would be too large for the stock ls6 bore? I know its pushing it but would the 208 valves cause problems?
2.08" is fine for a stock LS1 bore, some people have actually gone bigger successfully.

Look at it this way, a 2.08" valve is roughly 53% of a 3.898" bore. A 2.165" valve is 54% of a 4" bore, and I don't see people having too many issues with L92 heads on a stock bore LQ9. If I remember correctly, some of the highest horsepower LS1's are using hollow stem LS3 valves turned down to 2.08".
Old 11-12-2012, 03:07 AM
  #14  
Teching In
 
QCK57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Guys what my prediciment is....

347 standard bore built motor, ported 241.
Drag car only!

I am moving to a larger cubed motor late next year.

However i need to upgrade heads, so i got a deal on some All Pro heads, 6 bolt.
Just not sure what is the biggest valve that will fit in this 3.9 bore.
If they will fit?
but not as efficent?

I can live with until i get my new short block.
Old 11-12-2012, 03:50 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
wilfredes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any of the best head porters will tell you a 2.08 is too big for a 346ci.

Old 11-12-2012, 09:18 AM
  #16  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
batboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: middle of nowhere, Kansas
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Buy the heads and put them on the shelf until you get a bigger bore short block. I would not run them on a stock cube LS1.
Old 11-12-2012, 09:19 AM
  #17  
Staging Lane
 
J Glen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed
Lift has very little to do with the piston to valve clearance. The low lift duration numbers are far more important, along with lobe centerlines.

As stated, a 2.08" valve, while it will clear the bore, will be severely shrouded on a 3.898-3.908" bore.
It actually has nothing to do with PTV clearance. When the valve is at max lift the piston is at the bottom of the piston chamber.
Old 11-12-2012, 09:56 AM
  #18  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Damian
Any of the best head porters will tell you a 2.08 is too big for a 346ci. In most cases the job can get done with stock valves. I've made 460rwhp with stock valves before.
This X2.

I prefer stock valves really, but if you have to go aftermarket use a 2.02-2.04" intake hollow stem valve.

Also when TEA turns down a LS3 valve, 9/10 it's turned down to 2.04 like Chris1313 is using.
Old 11-12-2012, 08:46 PM
  #19  
Staging Lane
 
CATDIESEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: georgetown tx
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im running a stock short block with 2.08 intakes..... im not sure if it is the fastest set of heads out there but i have been running them for 30k miles or so and unless the cobra has a ken belle it will hold its own!
Old 11-12-2012, 09:20 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
therabidweasel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NH/MA
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

For a point of reference Mamo uses 2.055 on his ported AFRs. The man has some tricks up his sleeve though.


Quick Reply: are 2.08 valves to large for a stock bore ls1?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44 PM.