Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My LS1 is not a LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2010, 06:23 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
ss mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default My LS1 is not a LS1

OK, I bought a used LS1 out of a wrecked T/A. I could see it had 317 heads. I started tearing it down today and discovered the block is a 6.0L iron block. I know some people like these because you can bore them and get more CI. I was going to get a set of 243 heads and a LS6 intake for my LS1, don't know now. Any suggestions from all you gearheads out there. I am putting it in a classic truck-street rod, not a track car.
Old 08-19-2010, 06:26 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (51)
 
projectX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Don't see why you still couldn't do that.
Old 08-19-2010, 07:01 PM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
JAX04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indy
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

u my friend found a diamond in the rough
Old 08-19-2010, 07:10 PM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
ss mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why do you call it a diamond in the rough, what would you do with it?
Old 08-19-2010, 07:11 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
JAX04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indy
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

lol, you have the motor most people kill find on a budget. Its the budget boost motor of the century and the block and crank are responsible for many 9 sec cars hell the lq4 with rod bolts and springs has gone over 700whp
Old 08-19-2010, 07:12 PM
  #6  
Turd Gen Guy
iTrader: (63)
 
1nasty86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: andalusia, alabama
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

well you really need to know if its a lq4 or lq9 are the pistons flat or inverted?? and yes the ls6 intake and 243 heads will fit fine on the 6.0
Old 08-19-2010, 07:19 PM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
ss mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The pistons are flat
Old 08-19-2010, 07:19 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (43)
 
Steve01SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

The 243 heads flow about the same as the 317's... it would just increase your compression ratio with 243's. I would keep them and put in a mild cam and an ls6 intake... Run it as is.
Old 08-19-2010, 07:21 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
 
yarrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tn./ New Orleans on any given weekend
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thats an LQ9
Old 08-19-2010, 07:25 PM
  #10  
Turd Gen Guy
iTrader: (63)
 
1nasty86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: andalusia, alabama
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ss mike
The pistons are flat
the 243 heads will bump the compression of a lq9 to about 10.75-11.0 which is fine. more compression more power. id use the 243 heads and the ls6 intake. and get a cam spec'd by somebody. a 230/234 would be a good driveable cam, imo.
Old 08-19-2010, 07:45 PM
  #11  
Staging Lane
 
Zbinkley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Diamond in the rough??? These motors are a dime a dozen.
Old 08-19-2010, 07:48 PM
  #12  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
chasgiv3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Definitely the LQ9 with 10:1 compression ratio. Requires 92 Octane and weighs 416lbs. Produces 347 HP in stock form. 6.0 liter displacement

The LS1
Displacement = 5.7 L. / 346 CID
Bore x Stroke = 99mm x 92mm / 3.90" x 3.62"
Compression Ratio = 10.1:1
Horsepower = 335 HP @ 5,200 RPM (out of Fbody)
Weight is 425 lbs


Looks to me that the only downside to the block would be cooling efficiency. I know when I swapped in my LQ4 I had to go with a high flow water pump otherwise when idling in 90 plus heat the car would want to overheat. The heatsoak would cause problems without it. I swear I thought the Iron block was 90lbs heavier but GM says no. Odd to me.
Old 08-19-2010, 07:48 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
JAX04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indy
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

OK. Maybe i shouldve been more specific.

To the OP.

You went to the junk yard, or where ever to buy and LS1 from a wrecked car. what you got was a 6.0 motor. lol.

So you got more then what you bargained for.

is that better Zbinkley??

i was referring to the fact that he was after a 346ci motor with 241 heads and got a 364 ci motor with 317 heads.

so, with that said, IMO, he got more then what he was looking for.

i would be ecstatic to get one of those in place of an ls1
Old 08-19-2010, 07:51 PM
  #14  
Turd Gen Guy
iTrader: (63)
 
1nasty86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: andalusia, alabama
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chasgiv3
I swear I thought the Iron block was 90lbs heavier but GM says no. Odd to me.
you are correct! the iron block weighs about 90lbs more. but id rather have the 6.0 over the ls1. personal preferance.
Old 08-19-2010, 08:13 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
SOMbitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The 4.0" bore gives you much better head options. On a budget get some L92 heads and a L76/L92 intake and you have a great bang for the buck. They are more finicky about the cam than a cathedral head but the right combo will beat a budget cathedral setup everytime.... The increased compression of the LQ9 is a big bonus too. You lucked out my friend.....
Old 08-19-2010, 08:16 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
flintwrench69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mt Morris, Michigan
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JAX04
u my friend found a diamond in the rough
So a 6.0 truck motor is worth more than an LS1? I would agree with your statement if it was maybe an LS2. I understand a lot use the iron 6.0 to make power with but from what I have read you can pick one up for a lot cheaper than an LS1. Depends on what he paid for it I guess.
Old 08-19-2010, 08:19 PM
  #17  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
JAX04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indy
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by flintwrench69
So a 6.0 truck motor is worth more than an LS1? I would agree with your statement if it was maybe an LS2. I understand a lot use the iron 6.0 to make power with but from what I have read you can pick one up for a lot cheaper than an LS1. Depends on what he paid for it I guess.

i was thinking the same thing when i typed it. LS1s go for less then the LQ motors in my part. Atleast at my local LKQ.

i could pick up ls1 for around 800, but LQ4/9 go for around 1200 here.
Old 08-19-2010, 08:29 PM
  #18  
Turd Gen Guy
iTrader: (63)
 
1nasty86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: andalusia, alabama
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JAX04
i could pick up ls1 for around 800, but LQ4/9 go for around 1200 here.
EVERYTHINGS HIGH IN ALABAMA!
Old 08-19-2010, 08:54 PM
  #19  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
09camaro383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ahwatukee
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JAX04
i was thinking the same thing when i typed it. LS1s go for less then the LQ motors in my part. Atleast at my local LKQ.

i could pick up ls1 for around 800, but LQ4/9 go for around 1200 here.
I can get in Arizona a almost complete lq9 except for the intake in 600 it comes from ignition coils to oil pan i guess i should go and pick it up and the ls1 sell for 1200
Old 08-19-2010, 09:00 PM
  #20  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
djfury05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SOMbitch
The 4.0" bore gives you much better head options. On a budget get some L92 heads and a L76/L92 intake and you have a great bang for the buck. They are more finicky about the cam than a cathedral head but the right combo will beat a budget cathedral setup everytime.... The increased compression of the LQ9 is a big bonus too. You lucked out my friend.....
x2 on everything he said.. L92 heads have more potential than cathedral and flow 320 cfm right out of the box. Not to mention they are about $800 for a pair assembled ready to go... and the L76 intake comes with the throttle body ready to go for under $500.. can you say 450-475 rwhp without the blink of an eye?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 PM.