Yet another Cam Choice thread!
The Lowdown:
-Car is a 98 firebird formula M6
-original engine with 126.6k miles on it
-K&N filter, 4.10 gears, upgraded eaton locker, hooker headers and o/r y with gmmg catback
-I want something with a really nice lope to it but also something that will put me atleast at 400rwhp and similar torque
-Want a somewhat flat power/torque curve
-It will be a daily driver but I;m not concerned with dailying a HUGE cam hehe

-It will see the strip and the track occasionally
Last edited by 1Psycho; Dec 1, 2010 at 11:40 PM.

but I'll be going to the strip occasionally once I get the cam but not like a once a month thing unless somewhere around here has something once a month haha. Just trying to decide if it's worth camming the firebird or savin the money and gettin a project to go with it..
Love the sound of the TS Magic Sticks but how are their power/torqe curves? What kinda numbers do they put up on a good tune and the mods I have? I just dont think any ms cam will put me where I wanna be.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
The possibility of changing the shift points in the future is sort of another can of worms. A cam that is best for a 6200RPM shift point won't be the same as one for the 7000RPM

The 400RWHP might be sort of tricky with 6200RPM max, a new intake manifold will help... However since you have a manual that is an advantage. I think you can get there with intake duration in the 220's, all the while keeping up dynamic compression and also low-mid range torque / horsepower that you would otherwise give up by going wild with the duration. With the 4.10's your car won't be quite as horrid with a so called donkey-dick cam, but you will be giving up some part throttle and every day drivability for no reason if the max RPM is 6200RPM.
You could try browsing the dyno results section. In general one problem I have found looking for numbers is the lack of graphs because they aren't posted or because some times the threads are so old the graphs are gone. In addition, when people post numbers often times they don't even say what RPM the peaks are at.
Edit: opening up the RPM range to 6400RPM makes the selection IMO slightly easier. There are a few "cam only" cars with 400RWP with 224 type cams, but the LS6 intake manifold is going to be quite helpful. As far as the even bigger cams, I think it starts to make a lot less sense unless you have really good heads and intake manifold.
That EPS cam will make solid power under the curve. That's what unique about EPS lobes' characteristics and ramp rates.
You should call Geoff at EPS and just ask for his thoughts. He'll point you in the correct direction. Just make sure you're planning ahead as well, especially if you think you might eventually add heads/intake/etc.
Last edited by Squirts11; Dec 2, 2010 at 12:08 AM.
C33-790 LS Hydraulic Roller Camshaft; 228'/232', .612"/.612", 113'+4'; 2,200 to 6,200 RPM
Or for a tad more up top power:
C33-794 LS Hydraulic Roller Camshaft; 232'/236', .629"/.629", 113'+4'; 2,400 to 6,400 RPM
I just changed to a smaller cam to regain good street drive ability. The low end torque is Phenomenal ! And I don't think I lost much up top because my AFR was off only by about 1% !
Yet, a lot of it's in the tune and if your going to the strip occasionally, the larger cam will shine in the higher RPM range, and better with a new intake.
As quoted by HAZ Matt,
"The 400RWHP might be sort of tricky with 6200RPM max, a new intake manifold will help... However since you have a manual that is an advantage. I think you can get there with intake duration in the 220's, all the while keeping up dynamic compression and also low-mid range torque / horsepower that you would otherwise give up by going wild with the duration. With the 4.10's your car won't be quite as horrid with a so called donkey-dick cam, but you will be giving up some part throttle and every day drivability for no reason if the max RPM is 6200RPM."
PM me if interested.
BTW, don't you have to worry about the good ol Smog Check out there ?
Last edited by davidws6; Dec 2, 2010 at 10:12 AM. Reason: .







