TFS/TEA 215 Flow Numbers **with results**
#1
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
.100 68.4 61.9
.200 139.7 119.7
.300 218 186.7
.400 270.3 230.3
.500 306 255.4
.550 317.8 264.5
.600 324.2 269.1
Results
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...102-nw102.html
.200 139.7 119.7
.300 218 186.7
.400 270.3 230.3
.500 306 255.4
.550 317.8 264.5
.600 324.2 269.1
Results
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...102-nw102.html
Last edited by jlrz28; 10-26-2011 at 07:45 PM.
#4
#7
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aurora IL
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
How much did she put down just got off the rollers with a friends ride...
TEA stg 2.0 243's 60cc
ls3 valves
Stock upgraded rockers
EPS Cam
fast 102
car is nasty
243's for the win![The Patriot !!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_patriot.gif)
And look how flat the curve is.... so sexy
TEA stg 2.0 243's 60cc
ls3 valves
Stock upgraded rockers
EPS Cam
fast 102
car is nasty
243's for the win
![The Patriot !!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_patriot.gif)
And look how flat the curve is.... so sexy
Trending Topics
#12
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Right on.. I'm thinking about adding a set to my PRC 2.5 243's.. I have an early set that came with 2.04 intake valves vs the 2.02 they use now.. I wonder why they went to a 2.02 from a 2.04, possible shrouding issues on a 3.90 bore? Though that doesn't seem evident on your friend's 243's.
#13
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aurora IL
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Right on.. I'm thinking about adding a set to my PRC 2.5 243's.. I have an early set that came with 2.04 intake valves vs the 2.02 they use now.. I wonder why they went to a 2.02 from a 2.04, possible shrouding issues on a 3.90 bore? Though that doesn't seem evident on your friend's 243's.
#15
On The Tree
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San diego , CA
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
346 ci ? stock internals ?
Last edited by _GTO_; 09-30-2011 at 05:08 PM.
#16
On The Tree
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San diego , CA
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Right on.. I'm thinking about adding a set to my PRC 2.5 243's.. I have an early set that came with 2.04 intake valves vs the 2.02 they use now.. I wonder why they went to a 2.02 from a 2.04, possible shrouding issues on a 3.90 bore? Though that doesn't seem evident on your friend's 243's.