Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How much to you gain putting 243 heads on a lq4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-2011, 12:20 AM
  #21  
Staging Lane
 
Ironembraced's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by t_raven
Dang I never knew the 317s had a bigger chamber than the 243s. I had read they were basically the same. I've got an LQ4 but it's the early style with iron heads so I've been trying to decide what heads I want. Was trying to find a cheap set of 317s since they are cheaper than 243s.

I think I'm going to go with L92s and an LS3 intake. LS3 intakes are as cheap as LS6s and the heads will only be a little more, but that combo will make more power than 243s with an LS6 intake.

The L92's will make more power than the 243's...short answer, yes.

But ONLY at high RPMS. The 243's offer the LQ4 more power at low/mid range.

You will not be able to bump up your compression as you will with the 243's.
The following users liked this post:
Homer_Simpson (12-07-2021)
Old 11-04-2011, 09:49 AM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
Jim_PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elizabethtown, PA
Posts: 517
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by t_raven
That's pretty good, can you still get them new? I've been looking at LS3/L92 stuff on ebay and with all the LS3 Vettes and Camaros being modified there are a lot of low mileage take off heads and intakes at cheap prices.
http://sdparts.com/details/gm-perfor...parts/12576063

These are LS2 heads (799 or 243 castings) but do not come with the sodium filled valves.

Check around with your local GMPP dealer, they gave them to me for the same price.
Old 11-04-2011, 09:53 AM
  #23  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
t_raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Idaho
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Ironembraced
The L92's will make more power than the 243's...short answer, yes.

But ONLY at high RPMS. The 243's offer the LQ4 more power at low/mid range.

You will not be able to bump up your compression as you will with the 243's.
Ah good to know. I like the idea of the L92s because at some point I'd like to stroke the short block. For now I just want to get it running as cheap as possible. I guess I'll keep an eye out for a good deal on some 243s and LS6 intake.



Originally Posted by Jim_PA
http://sdparts.com/details/gm-perfor...parts/12576063

These are LS2 heads (799 or 243 castings) but do not come with the sodium filled valves.

Check around with your local GMPP dealer, they gave them to me for the same price.
Thanks for the link. I didn't know 799s were basically the same as 243s
Old 11-04-2011, 09:59 AM
  #24  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ironembraced
You cannot mill them very far without fly-cutting pistons. I've heard .030 is the max unless your camshift lift is pretty high.
LQ4's have valve reliefs in the pistons. You can mill the hell out of the heads on that engine and not have any clearance issues. FWIW.
Old 11-04-2011, 02:34 PM
  #25  
Staging Lane
 
Ironembraced's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Damian
LQ4's have valve reliefs in the pistons. You can mill the hell out of the heads on that engine and not have any clearance issues. FWIW.
I am curious to know exactly how much...I keep finding threads saying .030 was very tight space.

I'd like to get some 243s and mill them to 10.5:1 compression on my LQ4.
Old 11-04-2011, 02:49 PM
  #26  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (14)
 
Squirts11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 898
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Damian
LQ4's have valve reliefs in the pistons. You can mill the hell out of the heads on that engine and not have any clearance issues. FWIW.
True, in regard to PTV clearances. Also, I thought I'd add that milling much more than .030-.035" might affect intake/head port alignment (although this isn't always the case, as some mill more than .060" and just alleviate any intake sealing issues with other gaskets or additional RTV). While the 243 and 317 castings are usually considered identical in design (other than camber size), you wouldn't have identical products after milling a 317 casting to mimic the stock 243 chamber size (72vs63-can't remember exact specs).

Originally Posted by Ironembraced
You cannot mill them very far without fly-cutting pistons. I've heard .030 is the max unless your camshaft lift is pretty high.
PTV is affected by head gasket thickness, deck height in relation to how much (if any) the piston protrudes from the block, valve size, chamber size (milling) and camshaft duration and ICL, not max lift. Max lift occurs closer to BDC, and isn't a factor.

Last edited by Squirts11; 11-04-2011 at 03:24 PM.
Old 11-04-2011, 05:05 PM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Damian
LQ4's have valve reliefs in the pistons. You can mill the hell out of the heads on that engine and not have any clearance issues. FWIW.
I've never seen an LQ4 with valve reliefs. Maybe only on the very late ones.
Old 11-04-2011, 05:06 PM
  #28  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

LQ4 right, LQ9 left

LQ9-LQ4pistonsrods5.jpg?t=1260330988
Old 11-04-2011, 07:11 PM
  #29  
Staging Lane
 
Ironembraced's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
I've never seen an LQ4 with valve reliefs. Maybe only on the very late ones.
Yeah, I was kind of curious what they mean by valve reliefs on the LQ4. Was just assuming we're talking about the center dish.

By the way, most LQ4 pistons that I have seen do not have that cross-shape to the dish. My LQ4 is from a 2005, and the center dish has no cross. (or valve relief indentation)
Old 11-04-2011, 07:20 PM
  #30  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
WS6SP33D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: QuarterMile, KY
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes you would benefit from the install of 243's, But send them to A.I and it will be a hella benefit.
Old 12-10-2011, 08:26 AM
  #31  
Teching In
 
fheckro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can modify pistons or buy them so that is not so much a factor. What i am really curious about is how much meat can i lop off the heads before they become too fragile to handle the added compression. I want to build the LQ4 motor I have to it's max potential ... and like everyone else would like to do it the most economical way possible. I want the highest compression possible to run on race gas. Keep in mind i am running a Carb. My thinking here is use the best flowing head with the smallest chamber and cut them to the limit. Do whatever i have to to run my Texas Speed cam with .603 lift. TO get my name in the record books and keep it there i am thinking i will need close to 500hp; on gas;with no power adders or computers. Is this possible?

Fred
Old 04-06-2012, 03:07 PM
  #32  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (7)
 
Not Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

After reading the whole thread I was wondering I have lq4 or lq9. Not sure witch one because I have not taking the 317 off yet. But I have 243's, ls6 cam,fast 90mm intake, 90mm intake, fast fuel rails, and ls6 injectors. How much hp and torque will that make an will a stock 4l60e hold it.
Old 04-06-2012, 07:03 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
99fbodyTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JohnJanz@Texas-Speed
I think that would be a great move as the 243s will pick you up a decent bump in compression which will help quite a bit with driving this motor on the street. The heads flow right about the same but the compression bump is more then enough of a reason to do the swap in my opinion.
this....no brainer to me
Old 12-29-2015, 08:13 PM
  #34  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,457
Received 155 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

Came across this thread doing some reading...some bad info in here..

I have yet to see a factory LQ4 with "valve reliefs" in the pistons...all the ones I have seen are dished. That pic above the piston on the right is a 5.3l Piston...you can even see it's smaller in the pic compared to the one on the left.
Old 12-29-2015, 09:27 PM
  #35  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

some lq4's did indeed come with valve reliefs for one valve.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...t-pistons.html
Old 12-29-2015, 09:55 PM
  #36  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,457
Received 155 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

Interesting...I see there are from the newer ones with VVT...all the stuff I've messed with was 2005 back..makes sense.



Quick Reply: How much to you gain putting 243 heads on a lq4



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 AM.