Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Rod question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2011, 06:22 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
hollywood63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Rod question

Is there a reason why (crank clearance?) you can not use a 6 inch rod with a 1.425 CH piston? in a 2002 LQ4. Basically its a rod and piston combo for a genII 383

Thanks

Last edited by hollywood63; 12-30-2011 at 06:45 PM.
Old 12-30-2011, 07:50 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

other than the fact your piston would be over .060 inch out of the hole, no.

also depends on what crank you use.

my calculations are based on a 3.75 crank for the 383 and a 4 inch crank for the 6.0...

Last edited by bww3588; 12-30-2011 at 07:56 PM.
Old 12-30-2011, 07:58 PM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

and i dont see how that would work on an older 350 block because the piston would be over 1/4 out of the hole...something's not adding up here.
Old 12-30-2011, 08:00 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
chrisfrost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: phx the cactus patch
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Well I believe the rods "offset" measurments are different from gen 1 & 2 to gen 3 & 4 but more importantly The stock LS1 rod length is 6.098" and CH is 1.326" so add 6.098 and 1.326 and 1/2 of the stroke 3.622 or 1.811" so 1.811 plus 1.326 plus 6.098 and You should be right at 9.24" so a longer rod and a piston with larger than 1.326 would mean the piston would come out of the hole about .125 " or whatever ,,,,,I don't remember the CH of the piston You mentioned but it was 1.4xx something .
Old 12-30-2011, 08:05 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
hollywood63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This is what I came up with
.5 x 3.622 = 1.811 + 6 = 7.811 + 1.425 = 9.236



.5 x stroke + rod Length + comp hgt = piston deck height

with a stock deck height of 9.240 and everything else being perfect I figured i'd be .004 down

Did I figure correct?

What are you referring to with "rod offset"
Old 12-31-2011, 01:03 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
chrisfrost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: phx the cactus patch
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Yes that could possibly work with a 6" rod ,,,,,,,,I thought You said the rods You had thinkin of using were 6.2 or something like that .
Old 12-31-2011, 01:07 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
chrisfrost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: phx the cactus patch
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Offset is on the side to side plane inline with the crank from front to back the center of the pistons are'nt on the center line of the rods ,,,,,,they are just a little bit off center ,,,,,,,,not enough that's noticeable when looking at them with You're eyes ,,,,,,,,,,You can kinda see it if You compare the side of the rod that's rounded to the side that's squared off on the GM rods .
Old 12-31-2011, 08:01 AM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
hollywood63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I guess I was under the impression that they had the same bore centers so I figured the rods would line up properly




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.