what cam would you recommend for me?
i want a good sounding came but my bf got one with a 111 lsa and it was very hard to tune...
i don't want to go through that... but i want a very good/mean sounding cam when i am at a redlight... i want it loud (not quiet)
what would you guys recommend...
Last edited by SS GIRL; Mar 16, 2004 at 07:23 PM.
im sorry for all the questions but i want to make the right decision... From MSURacing: "What they mean by having 4 advance already in is that they have put the intake valve centerline at 110 degrees. This is going to help out the low and midrange power by giving you more 'Effective Compression Ratio.' This is why a cam is advanced is to take advantage of trapping effiecencies at lower RPMS. The trade off is going to be a little bit on the top end."
LSA is your lobe separation. A lower lsa gives more lope, usually a little less drivability, and a shorter peak power range. If I am wrong on this guys, please correct me!
Last edited by BoneSS; Mar 17, 2004 at 02:55 PM.
Trending Topics
Call ALAN of FUTRAL as he is a KING of lS1 CAM WORLD and tell him what you want, what your uses will be for the car, what power expectations you have and hard you want it to lope, etc and HE WILL HOOK YOU UP BIG TIME!
Go to one of the BEST for his experience and recommendations and you will be HAPPY AND GOOD TO GO!
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Personally, if you want something that will be very drivable, but make globbs of power, any of the 224/224 112LSA type cams would do that for ya. If you want something over the 400rwhp mark, but alittle lopier then the 224, hit up some of the Futural cams.
Oh, and save yourself the hassle with the MAC's, and pick up a set of real Long tube headers. They're about the same price now adays, and will give you better power.
.
i have the mac mids, off road y pipe, and a cutout; they aren't that loud. will be going back to quick time performance as soon as i get my cashflow going again. if your going for budget i'd recommend pacesetters. i think texas speed & performance has a special on them right now. as for cam choice, im eyeballin' the t-rex v.2 from thunder racing.
i have the mac mids, off road y pipe, and a cutout; they aren't that loud. will be going back to quick time performance as soon as i get my cashflow going again. if your going for budget i'd recommend pacesetters. i think texas speed & performance has a special on them right now. as for cam choice, im eyeballin' the t-rex v.2 from thunder racing. 
ok, now my question is... Pacesetters are louder than MACs? I listened to some sound clips but you know how it is on the computer.. and am I making the right decision if I go with LTs instead of Midlengths??
What they mean by having 4 advance already in is that they have put the intake valve centerline at 110 degrees. This is going to help out the low and midrange power by giving you more "Effective Compression Ratio". This is why a cam is advanced is to take advantage of trapping effiecencies at lower RPMS. The trade off is going to be a little bit on the top end. LSA is your lobe separation. A lower lsa gives more lope, usually a little less drivability, and a shorter peak power range. If I am wrong on this guys, please correct me!
You are correct in that the tighter the lobe center, the more peaky it will be. But this is only in reference to an exact lobe replica with only the centerlines moved.
Just because you have a tight LSA, it doesn't always mean it is going to idle rough either, it is the hole shape of the lobes that changes your idle, mainly because of the increased overlap.
Mark
ok, now my question is... Pacesetters are louder than MACs? I listened to some sound clips but you know how it is on the computer.. and am I making the right decision if I go with LTs instead of Midlengths??
It's not really "high pitched", but it is noticably higher .... and no the longtubes wont be much louder.
.
.

