Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Experts: How much do you know about dynamic cmpression ratio?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2004, 12:06 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
sbrown99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Experts: How much do you know about dynamic cmpression ratio?

Pleasee PM me with the response if possible, I'm sure that you don't like giniiing your hard eared info out to everybody. I know the forulma to calculate it, but what does it all mean? What is ideal compression taking into account intake opening events and octane?
Old 03-19-2004, 12:12 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Spinmonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 722
Received 61 Likes on 29 Posts

Default

what is the lsa on your 232 cam? Overlap is critcal. If it is 112 you can easily run 11.7 on 93 110: 12-12.2.
Old 03-19-2004, 09:06 AM
  #3  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I know someone looking at this right now.

You will find as the engine gets bigger, DCR goes down... They are looking at a possible linear relationship in DCR vs displacement.
Old 03-20-2004, 09:12 AM
  #4  
Teching In
 
427ls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Question about DCR vs. Displacement

J-Rod,

That sounds really interesting but I'm curious about your friends research: since the engine is in essence a large air pump, the larger it becomes, the more air it can suck into and out of a combustion chamber. Therefore for a given set of heads and cam and pistons, you'd think that it would be sucking more air out of the combustion chamber during operation than if you had a little engine and decreasing DCR. But it would also be sucking more air into the cylinder for combustion, therefore raising the dynamic compression ratio for a given set of heads and cam. So I don't really understand why the DCR would increase with Displacement, it seems it would be a washup. I know there may be some fluid dynamic reasons for the increase such as its easier for the air to leave than to enter a cylinder but other than that it would seem that their shouldn't be any relationship between DCR & displacement. Without giving to much away could you elaborate on his hypothesis for doing this trial. (sorry for the techninicality of this note)


Originally Posted by J-Rod
I know someone looking at this right now.

You will find as the engine gets bigger, DCR goes down... They are looking at a possible linear relationship in DCR vs displacement.
Old 03-20-2004, 03:25 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Spinmonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 722
Received 61 Likes on 29 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by J-Rod
I know someone looking at this right now.

You will find as the engine gets bigger, DCR goes down... They are looking at a possible linear relationship in DCR vs displacement.
Actually in use it is true; not due to displacement though. The bigger the displacement, the higher the static compression. However, when you use large displacement motors you will invariably be using a cam with mucho overlap from more duration and a norrower LSA which will lower dynamic CR.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 PM.