Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lifter pre-load?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2012, 07:43 AM
  #21  
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,707
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pray
When replacing lifters or any part of the valve trane you might want to know what your preload is as. Especially since there are two different types of LS7 lifters now.
That's news to me
Old 02-26-2012, 10:58 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Pray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Yeah, they were talking about it in another post llike this. Not sure exacltly when they were switched over but there were photo's of the differences. Plunger depth was just one of the differences.
Old 02-26-2012, 12:41 PM
  #23  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pray
Correct but that would have you end up with less preload if you don't count that part of the revolution. But his numbers end up larger. I guess that is why I am confused on his math.
Vettenuts numbers use a formula that reduces to approximately 0.078" per turn applied to the number of turns minus the one-third turn constant. Shane uses 0.049" per turn applied to the number of turns, unadjusted. The difference in the two methods is small at low turn counts and increases as the number of turns increase. However, since the preloads being established have a large window, and pushrods come in increments of 0.025" the difference in the two methods is acceptable in many instances. See attached.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Turns.pdf (87.0 KB, 346 views)
Old 02-26-2012, 01:40 PM
  #24  
TECH Regular
 
ZeeOSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darkman
Vettenuts numbers use a formula that reduces to approximately 0.078" per turn applied to the number of turns minus the one-third turn constant.
Just wanted to add that Vettenuts' calculation includes the rocker arm ratio of 1.7. Here's the post where he goes through the math.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/15087505-post42.html

I don't know exactly what the "2.7/1.7" factor is in Vettenuts' calculation example. The 1.7 is probably the rocker ratio, but what's the 2.7?
=====================
When the number of turns increases to 1-1/4, you still need to subtract the 1/3 bolt turn after the rocker seats in the stand.

(1.25-0.3333) X 1.25/25.4 X 2.7/1.7 = 0.071

=====================

I'm assuming he verified his math results with actual dial indicator measurements.

When Shane came up with his "1 turn = 0.049" pre-load", it may have only been checked at around 1 to 1-1/2 turns, thereby not showing that the 1 turn = 0.049 factor changes depending on how many turns are required to torque the rocker arm bolt to 22 ft-lbs.

Darkman - nice summary table.

Last edited by ZeeOSix; 02-26-2012 at 02:01 PM.
Old 02-26-2012, 02:15 PM
  #25  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZeeOSix
I don't know exactly what the "2.7/1.7" factor is in Vettenuts' calculation example. The 1.7 is probably the rocker ratio, but what's the 2.7?

https://ls1tech.com/forums/15237685-post15.html
Old 02-26-2012, 02:53 PM
  #26  
TECH Regular
 
ZeeOSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Not to nit-pick, but Shane's method was quoting 0.047" per turn instead of 0.049". See his attached word file.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/14930022-post24.html

It is a good exercise to try and nail these correlations down.

Here are a couple of other good posts in the same main thread [ https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...questions.html ]:

https://ls1tech.com/forums/14941833-post34.html

https://ls1tech.com/forums/14943159-post36.html
Old 02-26-2012, 03:30 PM
  #27  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Here is the more complete calculation. I think we are down to rounding differences below the usable threshold for this kind of measurement.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Preloads _.pdf (96.5 KB, 415 views)

Last edited by Darkman; 02-26-2012 at 06:46 PM.
Old 02-26-2012, 04:42 PM
  #28  
TECH Regular
 
ZeeOSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Darkman
Here is the more complete calculation. I think we are down to rounding differences below the usable threshold for this kind of measurement.
Looks good, except your thread calculation conversion and results columns are a decimal place off. Divide by 25.4 instead of 2.54 to convert mm to inches.
Old 02-26-2012, 06:47 PM
  #29  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Darkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZeeOSix
Looks good, except your thread calculation conversion and results columns are a decimal place off. Divide by 25.4 instead of 2.54 to convert mm to inches.
Done, thanks.
Old 02-26-2012, 08:48 PM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
Spartan7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZeeOSix
That's because GM has already figured out the correct parts (pushrod length, etc) to give the lifter plunger the right pre-load. GM doesn't write the manual assuming people are going to be modifying and put different parts in the engine. GM assumes all the OEM parts are being used, and in that case there would be need to worry about lifter pre-load.
And LS7 lifters are GM replacements. I reused all stock valvetrain. You can go on and on about pushrod cup heights and spring pressures. But the fact of the matter is, my valvetrain is silent and the engine is running fine.

I agree that it's wise to check your preload if you're installing a cam or aftermarket valvetrain. But I've messed with the preload on my H/C LT1 with LS7 lifters, and noticed almost no change between 1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 turn preload.

I was merely stating what method worked for me. If OP chooses not to do that, that's fine. But I'm not looking to get into an argument over lifters. There are plenty of methods for adjusting them, and this method worked for me.
Old 02-27-2012, 03:14 AM
  #31  
TECH Regular
 
ZeeOSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spartan7
And LS7 lifters are GM replacements. I reused all stock valvetrain. You can go on and on about pushrod cup heights and spring pressures. But the fact of the matter is, my valvetrain is silent and the engine is running fine.
GM has made the LS7 lifters the direct replacement part that supersede many of the LSx lifters previously used in LSx engines. They wouldn't do that unless they knew the LS7 lifters were direct replacements without messing up the valve train. So, no there shouldn't really be a need to worry about new pushrod length requirements if only LS7 lifers were installed and nothing else was changed.

Originally Posted by Spartan7
I agree that it's wise to check your preload if you're installing a cam or aftermarket valvetrain.
Absolutely ... everyone agrees with that.
Old 02-27-2012, 12:54 PM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Pray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZeeOSix
Not to nit-pick, but Shane's method was quoting 0.047" per turn instead of 0.049". See his attached word file.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/14930022-post24.html

It is a good exercise to try and nail these correlations down.

Here are a couple of other good posts in the same main thread [ https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...questions.html ]:

https://ls1tech.com/forums/14941833-post34.html

https://ls1tech.com/forums/14943159-post36.html
True that is what Shane says. But when I measured the bolt with my dial indicator I came up with .049" at one turn and .098" at two turns. Again, math to practice. We are only talking a couple of thousanths. The difference between Shane and Vettenuts measurements is huge in my opinion. At one turn it is in tollerance. But at 1 3/4 turn it is huge. You are talking .083-6" vs. .136" I made an adjustable push rod yesterday. I am going to the dyno tonight. When I get done I am going to use the adjustable push rod method and see what I come up with. I also noticed that in practice between the two methods both Shane and Vettenuts said that the push rod didn't move much more than a couple thousanths over the actual bolt. The only issue I see with this is that if the lifters are not brand new (like mine) and have oil in them. They actually started moving the valve not the lifter plunger. So it stands to reason that the plunger doesn't move much if the vave does. I am just going to do it the right way tomorrow and see what I come up with.
Old 02-27-2012, 05:54 PM
  #33  
TECH Regular
 
ZeeOSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pray
True that is what Shane says. But when I measured the bolt with my dial indicator I came up with .049" at one turn and .098" at two turns.
Yes, a metric thread pitch of 1.25 mm per turn does equate to 0.049" per turn on the rocker arm bolt itself.

But ... Shane's method, and vettenuts' method were measuring the movement of the rocker just above the pushrod with a dial indicator - which is essentially measuring the push deflection which equates to lifter pre-load. They were not measuring the rocker arm bolt movement.

Originally Posted by Pray
Again, math to practice. We are only talking a couple of thousanths. The difference between Shane and Vettenuts measurements is huge in my opinion. At one turn it is in tollerance. But at 1 3/4 turn it is huge. You are talking .083-6" vs. .136".
That's because vettenuts has accounted for the 1/3 bolt turn that occurs when the rocker arm bolt is torqued to 22 ft-lbs. This extra 1/3 turn does nothing to add lifter pre-load ... it's only used up in stretching the bolt to achieve the 22 ft-lbs of torque. When Shane did his method and came up with 0.047" per turn, he probably only did it at one point which is the point where Shane's and vettenuts' data are almost the same (around 1 to 1-1/4 turn of the rocker bolt).

Originally Posted by Pray
I also noticed that in practice between the two methods both Shane and Vettenuts said that the push rod didn't move much more than a couple thousanths over the actual bolt. The only issue I see with this is that if the lifters are not brand new (like mine) and have oil in them. They actually started moving the valve not the lifter plunger. So it stands to reason that the plunger doesn't move much if the vave does. I am just going to do it the right way tomorrow and see what I come up with.
If the lifters are pumped up and the valve does move when tightening the rocker bolt, then yes it would be hard to correlate these methods to determine needed pushrod length. And yes, in this case a pushrod checking tool is ultimately the best way to go.

You could probably turn the engine over a few times by hand before removing the rocker arms to help push oil out of the lifters so it would be easier to try the Shane/vettenuts method.
Old 02-27-2012, 08:51 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Pray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Good points. I am going to do the correct method tomorrow and see what I get. I got on the dyno tonight and didn't have any real issues. I jus want to be sure and eak out every last bit of what I have. I didn't gain as much out of the head mods as I thought but I did run out of injector. We will see. I will post up a dyno thread tomorrow when I have time.
Old 02-28-2012, 06:09 PM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Pray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

So I pulled the rockers today and this is what I found out. My preload was .110" on the intake and .105" on the exhaust. I also checked the valve trane geometry and it wasn't bad. I ended up shimming the intakes up about .047" and the exhaust .040". The geometry didn't move much but it isn't perfect. I am going to get some 7.350" push rods and take the shims out. Funny thing is that I went from 1 3/4 turns to 3/4 turns to 22ft/lbs. So in my case it looks like Vettenuts wins. 1 3/4 turns equaled .110ish pre-load.
Old 02-28-2012, 08:06 PM
  #36  
TECH Regular
 
ZeeOSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pray
So I pulled the rockers today and this is what I found out. My preload was .110" on the intake and .105" on the exhaust. I also checked the valve trane geometry and it wasn't bad. I ended up shimming the intakes up about .047" and the exhaust .040". The geometry didn't move much but it isn't perfect. I am going to get some 7.350" push rods and take the shims out. Funny thing is that I went from 1 3/4 turns to 3/4 turns to 22ft/lbs.
Good feedback info.

Originally Posted by Pray
So in my case it looks like Vettenuts wins. 1 3/4 turns equaled .110ish pre-load.
LOL ... hard to argue with applicable engineering science.
Old 02-29-2012, 05:43 AM
  #37  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Pray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I hate when science is correct and costs me money.
Old 03-05-2012, 08:41 PM
  #38  
Teching In
 
treybadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: LONGVIEW, TX
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am glad to see this thread. I have been preaching this anti .047" bullshit over on ls1gto for a while now. I thought I was the only one measuring with a dial indicator! I came up with about .078" for one turn. People are running WAY more preload than they think and giving false info all the time because they saw a thread somewhere that said .047"
Old 03-05-2012, 09:12 PM
  #39  
Teching In
 
treybadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: LONGVIEW, TX
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthr...594&highlight=
Old 03-05-2012, 10:27 PM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (35)
 
hiltsy855's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,148
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by treybadd
I am glad to see this thread. I have been preaching this anti .047" bullshit over on ls1gto for a while now. I thought I was the only one measuring with a dial indicator! I came up with about .078" for one turn. People are running WAY more preload than they think and giving false info all the time because they saw a thread somewhere that said .047"
I posted this a while back in this thread. Glad to see the .078" / turn figure verified with a dial indicator. As mentioned above you have to factor in the 1/3 of a turn that doesn't add pre-load, when torquing the bolt.

================================================== =======================================

This drawing shows movement of the rocker as it is being tightened down by the trunnion bolt for pre-load checking. The rocker at the valve tip is stationary. Due to the rocker ratio the pushrod end travels down .078" for every .049" (1 turn) of the rocker bolt. The ratio = .078 / .049 = 1.59 is also calculated as 2.7 / 1.7 = 1.59 since the valve tip is the pivot point.



Quick Reply: Lifter pre-load?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 AM.