Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Has anyone used ls7 rods in a ls1 or ls6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2012, 08:57 PM
  #21  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,049
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Interesting thread keep it updated.
Old 03-24-2012, 11:17 AM
  #22  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (39)
 
NVR_SPDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Does anyone know how much the Ti rods weigh?
Old 03-24-2012, 09:29 PM
  #23  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
S10xGN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Port Neches, TX
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NVR_SPDS
Does anyone know how much the Ti rods weigh?
According to this article, 480g vs 640g for a stock floating pin rod as per this thread...
Old 03-26-2012, 08:56 AM
  #24  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
darooke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Going to the dyno at 1pm today. I will let u guys know how it does and compare the old dyno curve to the new one. I might not get to the computer till late tonight though.
Old 03-26-2012, 10:31 AM
  #25  
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,708
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Can't wait to see the results!

Anyone know what cubic inches an LS6 would be at bored to a 3.905 with a 4" crank? This seems like a neat little combo for an NA street car.
Old 03-26-2012, 12:42 PM
  #26  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
SSCamaro99_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ballwin, MO
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by dr_whigham
Can't wait to see the results!

Anyone know what cubic inches an LS6 would be at bored to a 3.905 with a 4" crank? This seems like a neat little combo for an NA street car.
((3.905^2x4.00)*8)*.7854 = 383.25...roughly

or

((((3.905/2)^2)*pi)*4)*8 = roughly 383.238
Old 03-26-2012, 02:22 PM
  #27  
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,708
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SSCamaro99_3
((3.905^2x4.00)*8)*.7854 = 383.25...roughly

or

((((3.905/2)^2)*pi)*4)*8 = roughly 383.238
Thanks. I knew it would be with a 4" crank and 6.125 rods......

I just thought it would be slightly less given the Ti LS7 rod is a 6.067

Last edited by dr_whigham; 03-26-2012 at 02:28 PM.
Old 03-26-2012, 08:51 PM
  #28  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
darooke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Bad news. On a mustang dyno my car made 10 less hp and tq. i used the same dyno last time with smaller cam, less compression and stock rods and pistons. Only made 360hp 320tq. Tuner said he thinks it my stock maf/bellow choking the motor. he said he could tell by watching the map sensor.(I dont think i will gain the 40 hp and tq i am missing) I think it might be my tranny since it bounced off the rev limiter last time i went to the track. thought it hit the rev because i used a smaller diametor tire but it could be the trans, (still ran 11.8 at 116). Either way Thurs or friday I am installing a slp maf and bellow. If that does not improve the numbers i will get the tranny fixed. At least my motor is not huffing on decell any more.
I am going to throw up now then go to bed.
Old 03-30-2012, 07:30 PM
  #29  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
darooke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well found the problem. The car is not getting enough air. slp maf and slp smooth bellow layed down 25 hp and 34 more tq. My builder is now wondering if my intake is an ls6 intake because according to the map the car is still choking. Looks like a fast intake is next. Just glad i found the problem. here is the dyno graphs. One best run and one overlay with last weeks dyno before the slp maf and bellow. With the lighter rotating assembley the car is very responsive. this was done on a mustang dyno.


[IMG]http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h244/darooke/th_ls7rodsbuild
003.jpg[/IMG]



Last edited by darooke; 04-01-2012 at 04:06 PM.
Old 08-02-2013, 10:48 AM
  #30  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

Bringing this back.

For my rebuild 347 idea, I was thinking of using my stock crank, LS7 rods, and custom Wiseco Pistons and spin the whole thing to 7500+ all day long.
Old 08-02-2013, 11:26 AM
  #31  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, GA
Posts: 3,869
Received 55 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

You'll spend more money rebalancing for the ls7 rods then it would have costed you to get a good set of forged rods that will take more power in the first place.
Old 08-02-2013, 11:33 AM
  #32  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

If I'm looking to spin to a certain RPM, weight is the enemy. 480g rods are much lighter than even the 600g Compstar lightweight H-Beams.
Old 08-02-2013, 01:44 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
427zm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I too like th idea of using the LS7 rods in a build. Heck, a few months back, there was a set for sale on CL in Houston for $350! I probably should've picked them up. Thing is watching the C6Z section of the vette forum, there have been some LS7 rod issues as well as the known exhaust valve issues with the LS7. Still, this would make for a cool setup if you could pick up some rods for a decent price as long as when manga fluxed they tested out good. I wouldn't think the balancing would be any more than that of a typical assembly. It would be cool how fast this motor would spin up!
Old 08-02-2013, 01:46 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
427zm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Diet coke, as far as taking power, the LS7 rods have lived with substantial power thrown at them. Heck, every H/C C6Z has 540-600 NA, and when squeezed can take more than 700.
Old 08-02-2013, 01:51 PM
  #35  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

And 540-600rwhp is on a longer stroke with a bigger, heavier piston to boot...
Old 08-02-2013, 01:56 PM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
427zm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'd really be cool if GM performance would give us the LS7 crank w/o the long snout for the dry sump. There would be LS7 cranked wet sump 383's,402's,416's, and 427's everywhere!
Old 08-02-2013, 04:14 PM
  #37  
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,708
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

This makes me want to call Erik and pick his mind about an idea I have.... Damn you Jake for bringing this back up!
Old 08-02-2013, 04:19 PM
  #38  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

I aim to please!
Old 08-02-2013, 08:12 PM
  #39  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, GA
Posts: 3,869
Received 55 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 427zm
Diet coke, as far as taking power, the LS7 rods have lived with substantial power thrown at them. Heck, every H/C C6Z has 540-600 NA, and when squeezed can take more than 700.
Right, but you're going to have to a run a custom piston with that specific type of wrist pin design, and rebalance a crank made for steel rods, both of which add $. I'm not saying they arent a valid option, what I"m trying to say is they aren't budget friendly
Old 08-02-2013, 08:16 PM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
427zm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DietCoke
Right, but you're going to have to a run a custom piston with that specific type of wrist pin design, and rebalance a crank made for steel rods, both of which add $. I'm not saying they arent a valid option, what I"m trying to say is they aren't budget friendly
Gotcha. If you're planning on using these rods I don't know how budget friendly any of its going to be. It will be cool though!

I wonder if the OP could get on here and give an update on the setup? I'd love to see this thing spin past 7500!


Quick Reply: Has anyone used ls7 rods in a ls1 or ls6?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.