Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

best cam for stock converter car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2012 | 05:08 PM
  #21  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 83
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

I agree the 5.3 heads are crap. Hope they are at least ported.
Old 03-22-2012 | 10:11 AM
  #22  
street demon2k3's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: Palmview, Tx
Default

I had a 224R in my 98 and ir drove fairly well with a atock converter but did pull on the brakes some. Got used to it after a while but IMO a 220R or 212/218 would have been perfect if you want some lope without having to upgrade everything else.
Old 03-22-2012 | 03:18 PM
  #23  
VincesSS's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, FL
Default

I ran a 226/226 on a 112 patriot camshaft on a stock converter. Ran 7.90 @ 92 1/8th mile that way. Didn't really push to hard on the brakes with a 650rpm idle speed, didn't bother me at all personally. It was a tiny bit better on the 60ft, but pretty much identical (iirc it was a high 1.8 and was a low 1.9 prior to cam).

If I was to do it again I would have started with the converter, then the cam, but I wouldn't go any larger than the cam I had with the stock converter.
Old 03-22-2012 | 03:52 PM
  #24  
NC98Z's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Default

Probally one of Thunder Racings Cheater Cams.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 AM.