working out a long term plan for an LS1
working out a long term plan for an LS1 Getting on up there in miles and with all these go boom threads lately I'm getting nervous, that and I'm getting tired of the stock piston slap lol. My goals are basically a 400-500 RWHP (I would love 600, but don't think it fits into my other goals) engine that has very good street manners, and attains decent gas mileage (nothing crazy obviously). So I'm thinking of more cubes to offset any driveability issues with some larger cams, I know it can be done on stock cubes and maintain great DD abilities, so going larger has to make it even easier right? What are my CI options with the stock crank, and can it handle that power RELIABLY for a long time? or do I need to be looking at other cranks and going on to stroking it too? Oh yes.. usage.. street and strip car mainly. it's a weekend driver but its the DD if anything happens to my wife's car (thus the need for street manners). Help me narrow down my options fellas! budget - I want to keep the build under 10 for sure.. but estimate a 7500 build leaving me room for headache avoidance
Last edited by RacingTiger03; Apr 23, 2012 at 02:45 PM.
TECH Addict
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 5
From: PA/MD
In your case, I'd say shop around for a great deal on an lq4/9, since you can get them very cheap and rebuild that.....I guess the next steps would depend on how much you honestly want to spend.
Just remember to include in your budget an extra $300+- for all your gaskets and the price of a tune, and if you are running an automatic a higher stall and tranny cooler.
I'd also recomend put as much money into the bottom end as possible, then build from there, even if it means throwing your stock heads and intake back on a fully forged stroker till you can afford to upgrade to a better top end......id rather know I have a rock solid bottom end that can take anything I could thirsting at it later down the road
Just remember to include in your budget an extra $300+- for all your gaskets and the price of a tune, and if you are running an automatic a higher stall and tranny cooler.
I'd also recomend put as much money into the bottom end as possible, then build from there, even if it means throwing your stock heads and intake back on a fully forged stroker till you can afford to upgrade to a better top end......id rather know I have a rock solid bottom end that can take anything I could thirsting at it later down the road
I've been debating grabbing a junkyard LQ4/9 up for a long time.. they're a dime a dozen around here with all of the HD trucks around lol. But I think I really want to keep the weight down on the nose. FI is out if only from a pricing standpoint. I want to keep the build under 10 for sure.. but estimate a 7500 build leaving me room for headache avoidance lol. Looking at texas speeds options I found a rotating assembly and top end I liked really well. and assuming I take care of the tear-down build process myself it falls right in line. IIRC it was a 383 rotating assembly. Price wise for the rotating assembly it wasn't a lot more to move on up to a 408.. what does that entail for my block though? or is it even better to get a pre-assembled short-block and go from there?
I certainly wouldn't mind having an LS1 sitting around in case I find the project car I've been looking for (early 70's bird) sometime after I finish up the formula
And she is staying an M6 after this also, so no worries about stall and killing the trans.. the rear-end.. well that's another matter LOL
I certainly wouldn't mind having an LS1 sitting around in case I find the project car I've been looking for (early 70's bird) sometime after I finish up the formula
And she is staying an M6 after this also, so no worries about stall and killing the trans.. the rear-end.. well that's another matter LOL
everybody has deep pockets don't they? LOL. forged rotating assembly ~ 2500 3500, procharger ~5K? AI headwork ~ 1K for CNC ... ok well that doesn't sound too bad, but it feels like I'm missing something there somewhere, and that procharger price is probably way off, as its not something I've looked into.
87lbs difference from aluminum to iron block doesn't sound too bad, but again to drop the weight back down you're losing the budget portion and probably diminishing returns at that point, and the nose is already hefty enough
. Same deal with SC options... about 50lbs more there too. If you can't tell I'm partial to NA LOL. I'm not against a S/Ced 383 though, as that will leave me room if I decide it's not working out later to change the cam and drop the FI, but again the pricing throws FI out, especially after machining etc for a 383.... now a stock built LQ4.. how much boost can they handle? a SC 6.0 putting out 500-600RWHP and being mild mannered on the street sounds tempting... but again.. $?
predator, that power level in your sig is something I would be happy with... numbers like that are what make me debate doing a forged 347 assembly with killer heads (215AFR's) and a mild cam for now... That would leave me room to grow into FI later if I ever decide it fits into my plans
87lbs difference from aluminum to iron block doesn't sound too bad, but again to drop the weight back down you're losing the budget portion and probably diminishing returns at that point, and the nose is already hefty enough
. Same deal with SC options... about 50lbs more there too. If you can't tell I'm partial to NA LOL. I'm not against a S/Ced 383 though, as that will leave me room if I decide it's not working out later to change the cam and drop the FI, but again the pricing throws FI out, especially after machining etc for a 383.... now a stock built LQ4.. how much boost can they handle? a SC 6.0 putting out 500-600RWHP and being mild mannered on the street sounds tempting... but again.. $?predator, that power level in your sig is something I would be happy with... numbers like that are what make me debate doing a forged 347 assembly with killer heads (215AFR's) and a mild cam for now... That would leave me room to grow into FI later if I ever decide it fits into my plans
Trending Topics
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
predator, that power level in your sig is something I would be happy with... numbers like that are what make me debate doing a forged 347 assembly with killer heads (215AFR's) and a mild cam for now... That would leave me room to grow into FI later if I ever decide it fits into my plans
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo This is kind of what I'm thinking right now.. you guys tell me how it sounds for a street/strip car. 383/408 rotating assembly (383 if a 408 means re-sleeving, haven't gotten that far researching just yet). Non-forged, NA, MS3 cam, AFR 215s port matched shooting for a compression around 11:1.. assuming I can squeeze all of that within my budget including all the bits and pieces, probably not.. I'll end up compromising on the heads most likely.
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
that's the kind of info I'm looking for also predator.. If you don't mind me asking, is that with you doing the install, or a shop? Obviously either way that includes machine shop work. That power can be done less expensively for sure.. but not with a new bottom end included.
This is kind of what I'm thinking right now.. you guys tell me how it sounds for a street/strip car. 383/408 rotating assembly (383 if a 408 means re-sleeving, haven't gotten that far researching just yet). Non-forged, NA, MS3 cam, AFR 215s port matched shooting for a compression around 11:1.. assuming I can squeeze all of that within my budget including all the bits and pieces, probably not.. I'll end up compromising on the heads most likely.
This is kind of what I'm thinking right now.. you guys tell me how it sounds for a street/strip car. 383/408 rotating assembly (383 if a 408 means re-sleeving, haven't gotten that far researching just yet). Non-forged, NA, MS3 cam, AFR 215s port matched shooting for a compression around 11:1.. assuming I can squeeze all of that within my budget including all the bits and pieces, probably not.. I'll end up compromising on the heads most likely.
Have you looked at the TSP shortblocks?
Last I looked they were hard to beat for the dollar. By the time you add up all the costs plus machine work it becomes very appealing to call them up and turn in your old engine as a core.
Last I looked they were hard to beat for the dollar. By the time you add up all the costs plus machine work it becomes very appealing to call them up and turn in your old engine as a core.
As for 383 vs 347... The difference in price of $500 for an assembled short block (from TSP) isn't enough to make or break the heads portion of the budget, but who knows.. lol.
Predator that helps a lot! thank you, at least I know I can definitely get what I'm after in that budget even if it's not larger cubes at the end of the day
Back to this shortblock thing... an LQ9 based 421 and LS1 based 383 come in at very close to the same price.. advantages/disadvantages of each? (aside from the weight factor)
TECH Addict
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 5
From: PA/MD
I agree with Pred, and I'm partial because I run one 
after you go past the 4.00" stroke you start to get more wear due to how fee the short piston skirts come down out of the bottom of the bore and let the piston rock, and past a 4.30" bore your cylinder walls are getting thin (4.30" bore gives you enough material to go larger the next time) if you run your 408 for 100,000+ mile and want to rebuild it.
after you go past the 4.00" stroke you start to get more wear due to how fee the short piston skirts come down out of the bottom of the bore and let the piston rock, and past a 4.30" bore your cylinder walls are getting thin (4.30" bore gives you enough material to go larger the next time) if you run your 408 for 100,000+ mile and want to rebuild it. 
when mine goes a junkyard 5.3 and a turbo will be going in, honest if i wanted to buy a motor it would be real hard not to get a block from tsp,there prices like what has been said are pretty fair when ya figure out all the cost of doing something yourself
very nice input guys! so then 408 vs 383? I have a friend that just had his LS2 built into a 408 after a spun bearing in a TBSS, haven't gotten to go for a ride along yet cause his new 4l80e blew the TC on the way home.. It will be interesting to feel that, he's putting down about 500hp through a 3200 stall and 4l80e with his setup, and a VERY mild cam for a 408. as for 383, I'm partial to that engine as that one holds some stigma for me...the next engine in my dads car was going to be a 383 before he just stopped racing and sold his car, would love to build a car he'll be proud of also, and let me tell you he is VERY picky lol! as for 408 and 383.. heads have to be a part of this cost, I can get by with 215s for the 383, but won't I need to step up to a 235 for the 408? more $$$ there also... gotta account every penny while I'm planning haha
TECH Addict
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 5
From: PA/MD
I'm looking at the AFR 245s. As of tight now I'm still running my original 241s ported and milled to 57cc chambers to give me 12.5:1 compression, but my cam is a comp 255/263 .624/.624 115lsa which drops my dcr back down to a pump gas friendly 8.22:1.
Even running these heads the engine is an absolute beast and pulls hard as hell till I hit my 8,000 rpm fuel cut off
Even running these heads the engine is an absolute beast and pulls hard as hell till I hit my 8,000 rpm fuel cut off
I'm looking at the AFR 245s. As of tight now I'm still running my original 241s ported and milled to 57cc chambers to give me 12.5:1 compression, but my cam is a comp 255/263 .624/.624 115lsa which drops my dcr back down to a pump gas friendly 8.22:1.
Even running these heads the engine is an absolute beast and pulls hard as hell till I hit my 8,000 rpm fuel cut off
Even running these heads the engine is an absolute beast and pulls hard as hell till I hit my 8,000 rpm fuel cut off
WOW, can we just trade cars? LOL. In all seriousness what kind of CI and block are you running? That's way more cam than I would want in anything under a 427 or 408, but how are it's street manners... like what RPM do you get bucking in? if at all..
TECH Addict
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 5
From: PA/MD
Right now my GTO has been in my garage going under the knife for the ladt several months....3 speed manual swap, 4 link, 9", 4.56 gears, tub, full cage and chassis, trying to get the whole csr fown to around 2,500 lbs.
Before my tranny went out the last time I could tub and beat sport bikes, so i cst wait to see what it will do when im done with it
ahh, yeah I could see that cam being ok in a 408, and is actually something similiar to what I would go after in that size. If you don't mind me asking what do you have in that setup? And was it something you built yourself and put together or mostly done by a shop? if you don't want to reveal all that much pm is fine too