Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Compression for my 408 with this cam...too low?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2012, 03:11 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Stroker2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Compression for my 408 with this cam...too low?

Ok, I'm a little stuck with my LS2 street/strip build- my current setup will have compression of 10.3:1 SCR/7.75 DCR using the parts I own. Conventional thinking is higher compression works better w/ bigger cams, so the potential to improve my setup is there...question is how much HP& Tq will raising the compression actually get me?.. My problem is the cam that I have is a tweener really...and to get higher SCR (like to 11:1) I would have to buy different heads. Before I consider buying different heads and/or cam....interested to know what everyone thinks about the current set-up I have and if raising the compression (with diff heads) or buying a smaller cam will make that big of a difference for my situation...I want under the curve street performance 1st...w/occasional trip to track 2nd..

Currently the set up below gives me 10.3:1 SCR 7.75 DCR:
408 Cid
PRC CNC Heads 227cc w/72cc chambers
240/244 cam .609/.612 114LSA on 109ICL
3600 stall
A4
3.71 gears
LT dual exhausts



I don't want to mill my heads and risk the intake ports and bolts not matching after that...

My other simple option would be to get a smaller cam...
Old 08-16-2012, 04:24 PM
  #2  
Launching!
 
c5z16z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 238
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

im looking at a 408 my self still doin homework on heads and cam combos, now i have 93 every were down here in houston, i have talked to alot of people about it and have came up with 11.8:1 static comp and 8.3:1 dynamic comp,

i am still trying to figure out what is a good dynamic comp, without getting any pre ignition/detonation ,, i have heard 8.5 dynamic is max on 93 pump.
Old 08-16-2012, 05:20 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Go smaller on the cam and tighter on the lsa.

If you go with a 236/240 111+4 that should get you dcr up to a little over 8 and only bring the overlap up from 14* to 16* and you power band will be around 300rpm lower.
Old 08-16-2012, 05:31 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Stroker2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

99Bluz28

...that's in line with what I'm thinking....smaller cam, advance it to close intake sooner and raise DCR to around 8.2....my SCR will still be low at 10.3 but pump gas friendly for sure....wonder how much power I'm really leaving on the table with a 10.3 scr vs 11+ compression and this setup..???
Old 08-16-2012, 05:52 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Stroker2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A reputable sponsor on this website recommends a 231/239 113+4 cam which would change my DCR to 8.02....the power band advertised for this cam is 2000-7000 rpms...

Next size bigger is the 235/243 113+4....2200-7200....

and then 99Bluz28's 236/240 111+4 recommendation...


Am I splitting hairs at this point and/or does anyone see a clear cut advantage with any of the 3 mentioned above? All are smaller and therefor probably better for my particular set-up...question is which one?

.
Old 08-16-2012, 09:48 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA/MD
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Another option for you would to be either swap to a small dome piston, or have the head chsmbers welded up a little to get the chamber size down.
Old 08-16-2012, 09:49 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA/MD
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Fyi, right now I'm running 12.5:1 scr, and 8.22:1 dcr....255/271 cam on pump gas
Old 08-16-2012, 11:50 PM
  #8  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
intenseblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Best bet would be to call Texas Speed with this question.
Old 08-17-2012, 03:04 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stroker2112
A reputable sponsor on this website recommends a 231/239 113+4 cam which would change my DCR to 8.02....the power band advertised for this cam is 2000-7000 rpms...

Next size bigger is the 235/243 113+4....2200-7200....

and then 99Bluz28's 236/240 111+4 recommendation...


Am I splitting hairs at this point and/or does anyone see a clear cut advantage with any of the 3 mentioned above? All are smaller and therefor probably better for my particular set-up...question is which one?

.
I'm not sure how high you willing to go on lift but i figured that cam with xer lobes, and it's power band would be just a little higher than the 231/239 113+4 cam, but with more power. Now if you're will to go up higher in lift then a 235(lsl .621")/ 238(lxl .615") 111+4 should give you a little more power then the 236/240 111+4, but with a little less OL (14.5*) and basically the same power band.
Old 08-17-2012, 07:00 AM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Stroker2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

THanks 99Bluz28

I went with the smallest cam (231/239) knowing that in my other engine (418/LS3) I have a 236/242 and also still the 240/244 on the shelf.

THanks to all who posted, appreciate your insights...

Drive safe

Stroker2112




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 PM.