EPS 230/230 .600/.600 113+2, anybody running it?
01-31-2013, 06:51 PM
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EPS 230/230 .600/.600 113+2, anybody running it? Looking at running it in my 01 SS, stock 241 heads, BBK long tubes, off road Y, 3.5" mufflex, 3500 stall, 3.23 gear. Looking for something with decent driving characteristics that makes power in a usable range for the 3500 stall.
02-01-2013, 10:55 AM
#4
TECH Senior Member
Well on a 113+2 It has too late an IVC 46 for my taste on a LS6 intake at stock compression. It will only have 4* overlap.
On 111+3 LSA it will have a 43 IVC, witch means a power peak of around 6200>6300 rpm on a LS6 intake, add 500 to that and you can shift anywhere from 6600>6800 with good results. Also this would give it 8* overlap, so theoretically extra power.
Yes the power-band will come on few rpm sooner (which brings trq on sooner)
On 111+3 LSA it will have a 43 IVC, witch means a power peak of around 6200>6300 rpm on a LS6 intake, add 500 to that and you can shift anywhere from 6600>6800 with good results. Also this would give it 8* overlap, so theoretically extra power.
Yes the power-band will come on few rpm sooner (which brings trq on sooner)
02-02-2013, 12:59 AM
#9
TECH Senior Member
I did not say it would be bad, I said I prefer it on 111+3 LSA. Right away you have a C5 Vs Z28. Not same weight, not same launch (and certainly not same cornering 
)
See a Vette does not require as much trq to move that weight in the low mid range rpms. (Still to have that trq is fun, just need more driving skills to get a hold on it).
)See a Vette does not require as much trq to move that weight in the low mid range rpms. (Still to have that trq is fun, just need more driving skills to get a hold on it).
