Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Anyone running Brian Tooley SLR lifters?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2013, 12:06 PM
  #61  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tainted
The lighter the better period. I opted for the hollow stem valves with my heads and im glad I did.
Yeah, I just shot Mike an email. Earlier today he said the heads were ready for assembly. I wonder if I'm too late to get the Ferrea swapped out for the LS3 valves.
Old 03-12-2013, 12:07 PM
  #62  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
ckpitt55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tainted
The lighter the better period. I opted for the hollow stem valves with my heads and im glad I did.
+1, will be running hollow stem intake valves in my heads as well.
Old 03-12-2013, 01:25 PM
  #63  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (9)
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 4,763
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tainted
Electric pump?
Who makes one for the LS engines?
Originally Posted by ckpitt55
electric pump or design a lifter with a progressive leak rate to maintain lifter cup position through the range of engine speeds. pump would be much easier to do I'd think, and it would also allow you to pre/post flow oil through the engine prior to start up and after shut-down.

just theoretical though, I think the costs associated with doing this would be even more offensive than the prices of some of the link bar lifters.
But the pump creates flow, not pressure. The restrictions create the pressure So I still would love to see an engine that you can put a load on and the oil PSI doesn't go up at all.

Last edited by King Nothing; 03-12-2013 at 01:31 PM.
Old 03-12-2013, 01:35 PM
  #64  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
ckpitt55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by King Nothing
But who makes an electric oil pump for a LS engine?

But the pump creates flow, not pressure. The restrictions create the pressure So I still would love to see an engine that you can put a load on and the oil PSI doesn't go up at all.
lol it wouldn't be a bolt-on.

flow and pressure head are coupled. the engine internals are fixed, so if you force more flow through a defined restriction you are going to increase the pressure. with a variable controller, you can send the tach signal to the pump and adjust its speed according to how much or little is consumed.

proof of concept: take a garden hose, stick your thumb over the end of it and open the valve only slightly. then fully open the valve to increase the flow rate. I guarantee the force (pressure) you feel on your thumb is significantly more in the second case.

Last edited by ckpitt55; 03-12-2013 at 01:41 PM.
Old 03-12-2013, 01:38 PM
  #65  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (9)
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 4,763
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ckpitt55
lol it wouldn't be a bolt-on.

flow and pressure head are coupled. the engine internals are fixed, so if you force more flow through a defined restriction you are going to increase the pressure. with a variable controller, you can send the tach signal to the pump and adjust its speed according to how much or little is consumed to maintain a constant pressure.
But who would spend the millions of dollars on R/D for this? Do any engines you know of run an engine where the oil PSI stays the same whether you are under load or at idle or at startup with cold oil
Old 03-12-2013, 01:52 PM
  #66  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
ckpitt55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

it wouldn't take millions in R/D, it might take millions in components though lol. the tech already exists on heavy industrial equipment. not all that practical for your every day driver.

Last edited by ckpitt55; 03-12-2013 at 02:03 PM.
Old 03-12-2013, 01:55 PM
  #67  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (9)
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 4,763
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

lol sorry i meant on automotive applications
Old 03-12-2013, 02:24 PM
  #68  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
ckpitt55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by King Nothing
lol sorry i meant on automotive applications
taking this to pm's now that I've thoroughly derailed the thread


bringing it back on topic, I guess the takeaway from this thread is that overall valvetrain component matching is more important than finding *the* magic lifter. valves, springs, pushrods, rockers, everything.

I'm curious how the bleed down rate of the SLR compares against the LS7 at high rpm....from how I'm understanding this, a slow leakage rate would help at low to mid speeds and reduce lift losses when oil pressure isn't that high, but wouldn't they pump up more easily at high rpm since less oil is being allowed to escape / unit time, exacerbating the whole valve bounce/float issue? Slow leakage rate compared to what, I wonder..

Last edited by ckpitt55; 03-12-2013 at 02:50 PM.
Old 03-12-2013, 02:43 PM
  #69  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
*02WS6TURK*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Oregon Grown
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Glad I found this thread before I installed the LS7's. I'm going with these SLR lifters now.
Old 03-12-2013, 05:23 PM
  #70  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ckpitt55
I'm curious how the bleed down rate of the SLR compares against the LS7 at high rpm....from how I'm understanding this, a slow leakage rate would help at low to mid speeds and reduce lift losses when oil pressure isn't that high, but wouldn't they pump up more easily at high rpm since less oil is being allowed to escape / unit time, exacerbating the whole valve bounce/float issue? Slow leakage rate compared to what, I wonder..
The SLR lifters shouldn't pump up any more than a standard lifter, but if you are lofting components and the plunger comes up, it will take longer for these lifters to bleed down, or seat the valves. The key there is don't loft your valve train components.

There's a SAE standard for leakdown rate.
Old 03-12-2013, 09:01 PM
  #71  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
96lt4c4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by *02WS6TURK*
Glad I found this thread before I installed the LS7's. I'm going with these SLR lifters now.
Brians point is there is nothing wrong with the LS7's as long as you can keep your valve train under control. I am running the LS7's that I already have in my new 402 setup. My cam does not have super aggressive lobes, and I will be running his best spring kit. I do not know all your specs but after going over mine with Brian, he said the LS7's will be fine for me.
Old 03-12-2013, 10:45 PM
  #72  
Teching In
 
z28josh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i just installed SLR lifters in my 408 now im waiting on pushrods and the time to finish installing everything else. My preload will be right around .050 or a hair lower. I have tsp .675 springs but i do have the heavier valves that come with prc 247s but i am also running HUC lobes
Old 01-06-2014, 09:08 PM
  #73  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (32)
 
Rare96LT1Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Bump!

Need some lifters for my build right now. Not sure weather I need BTR, Morel, Jessel, etc!
Old 02-26-2014, 02:00 PM
  #74  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (5)
 
bmeyer40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rare96LT1Formula
Bump!

Need some lifters for my build right now. Not sure weather I need BTR, Morel, Jessel, etc!
What did you choose?
Old 02-26-2014, 05:47 PM
  #75  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
BlueBird346's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oxford, AL
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Tooleys website says they're out of stock. Anyone know where I can buy a set?
Old 04-09-2014, 12:18 AM
  #76  
TECH Regular
 
Baconz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a set of slr lifters. What length pushrods you guys running with these lifters?
Old 04-09-2014, 01:51 AM
  #77  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Exidous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

/rests head in hand......

Measure. Brian stated they are the same as a stock lifter. The setup of ALL of the other valve train components will determine length. Not the lifters.

Valve length
Rockers used
Cam used (different base circle than stock?)
Head design/milling
Old 04-09-2014, 06:50 AM
  #78  
TECH Regular
 
Baconz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Exidous
/rests head in hand......

Measure. Brian stated they are the same as a stock lifter. The setup of ALL of the other valve train components will determine length. Not the lifters.

Valve length
Rockers used
Cam used (different base circle than stock?)
Head design/milling
Cam is from Brian tooley. 229/244 615/596 on a 113+4. Rockers are stock ls3 rocker arms with trunion kit. Heads are Ls3 with btr 660 springs. No milling on them at all. Motor is a ls3 top . 6.0 block with ls3 internals.
Old 04-09-2014, 07:21 AM
  #79  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Exidous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Odds are the stock length or slightly longer will be needed. Most aftermarket cams require a smaller base circle in order to achieve the desired lift. The longer PR compensates for this.

You need to measure to be sure.
Old 04-09-2014, 07:24 AM
  #80  
TECH Regular
 
Baconz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Exidous
Odds are the stock length or slightly longer will be needed. Most aftermarket cams require a smaller base circle in order to achieve the desired lift. The longer PR compensates for this.

You need to measure to be sure.
Reason I asked Brian sent me 7.350 length pushrods


Quick Reply: Anyone running Brian Tooley SLR lifters?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 PM.