Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Planning CA legal LS1 build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2013, 08:37 PM
  #21  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
bhobbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chino, Ca
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blk98Vert
Normally I would say go boost but your budget is 6K and that might be a little tight. Well for starters your intake setup. The only legal option is a K&N FIPK II kit, you could run an air lid and switch back to stock for smog, but the K&N is legal all the time. For an intake manifold you have 2 options. An SLP LS6 intake is CARB approved because it has an EGR provision. Also the FAST 102 is CARB approved. As far as heads go stay stock or get the AFRs, honestly I would just get 243s and grind the casting #s off. For a cam there are a number of CA grinds or you can have one specd out. For exhaust, get some short tube headers, I believe edelbrocks are the only ones approved. For a catback thats up to you, all are legal with a proper muffler
If we can afford it, I plan on going with the AFRs. I'm not sure if the FAST is worth it on stock cubes N/A.

For shorties flow better than stock manifolds?
Old 04-14-2013, 08:57 PM
  #22  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

They are on a 98-99.
Old 04-14-2013, 09:12 PM
  #23  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
bhobbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chino, Ca
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99Bluz28
They are on a 98-99.
The FAST or the shorties?
Old 04-14-2013, 09:53 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
 
transwiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If you could swing AFR's and a decent cam that would be good. If not 243 heads and cam that's not too hot. In the end a good tune is really important.A fast intake is a lot of money for stock cubes. At least a ls6 intake looks like the stock one. The key in calif. is passing the tail pipe and not having them look too close under your car.
My car didn't pass smog with 317 heads because of my 2.08 intakes and grappy tune.That size intake is too big. They run better with stock 2.00 or 2.02.size.Even though they are milled to 64cc with a lot of port work.
I had this stuff done by a guy before I knew what I know now.At least you are asking people on this forum before you buy a bunch of parts.That's really important to get the right combo.
Old 04-14-2013, 10:45 PM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bhobbs
The FAST or the shorties?
The shorty's.

As far as the intake manifold, I'd hold off and try and find a used SLP LS6 intake, or buy a regular LS6 intake and modify it to except the EGR tube, that's only if you believe can make it a clean integration onto the manifold.
Old 04-15-2013, 02:13 AM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

From personal experience, (-6) overlap passes in Cali if installed properly. (-4>-2) will pass but is more tune dependent.
The size of the intake valve is not relative and that issue is tune related.
Old 04-15-2013, 02:14 AM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Blk98Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bhobbs
If we can afford it, I plan on going with the AFRs. I'm not sure if the FAST is worth it on stock cubes N/A.

For shorties flow better than stock manifolds?
For your build, the FAST would probably not net you much more than a LS6. As stated the SLP LS6 is the quick way to make it legal. And yes shorties are an upgrade over stock on 98-99
Old 04-15-2013, 11:18 AM
  #28  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
bhobbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chino, Ca
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blk98Vert
For your build, the FAST would probably not net you much more than a LS6. As stated the SLP LS6 is the quick way to make it legal. And yes shorties are an upgrade over stock on 98-99
Ok. Glad I'm asking because I'm not going to buy parts I won't benefit from.
Old 06-18-2013, 11:34 PM
  #29  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
bhobbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chino, Ca
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's what I am thinking so far.

LS1 stock short block rebuilt
Tick Performance LS1 Emissions cam (218/230 .59x"/.60x" LSA 117+2)
AFR 210s with 66cc combustion chambers
SLP LS6 intake (not sure if that would need any work like port matching)
Ported stock throttle body
California legal shorty headers
New cat back (I like the Borla)

What kind of power range should I see with a build like this?
Old 06-19-2013, 01:18 AM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bhobbs
Here's what I am thinking so far.

LS1 stock short block rebuilt
Tick Performance LS1 Emissions cam (218/230 .59x"/.60x" LSA 117+2)
AFR 210s with 66cc combustion chambers
SLP LS6 intake (not sure if that would need any work like port matching)
Ported stock throttle body
California legal shorty headers
New cat back (I like the Borla)

What kind of power range should I see with a build like this?
With the AFR 210s you could run less exhaust duration, and in turn run a tighter lsa, which would net a lower power band with better low-end power. I'd consider a 218/226 115 lsa +3, it'll have -8* overlap so passing smog should be a problem. I'd also recommend having the heads milled to 62cc for even more power, especially since you should have good PTVC.
Old 06-19-2013, 10:21 AM
  #31  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
bhobbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chino, Ca
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99Bluz28
With the AFR 210s you could run less exhaust duration, and in turn run a tighter lsa, which would net a lower power band with better low-end power. I'd consider a 218/226 115 lsa +3, it'll have -8* overlap so passing smog should be a problem. I'd also recommend having the heads milled to 62cc for even more power, especially since you should have good PTVC.
Ok, I'll look at some more cams then. What about rockers? Would stock work or do I need to go aftermarket? Would it be worth doing the Comp trunnion upgrade?
Old 06-19-2013, 10:58 AM
  #32  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Stick with the stock rockers and do the trunion upgrade. That will be more then enough for your needs.

Agree no need to go that wide on the exhaust split, a 220/224 would be a nice cam to have and should still pass emissions.

Mill the crap out of the heads to get compression up, also get a tight quench with some thinner cometic head gaskets. That increase power and does not increase smog to make you fail.
Old 06-19-2013, 11:39 AM
  #33  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
bhobbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chino, Ca
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redtan
Stick with the stock rockers and do the trunion upgrade. That will be more then enough for your needs.

Agree no need to go that wide on the exhaust split, a 220/224 would be a nice cam to have and should still pass emissions.

Mill the crap out of the heads to get compression up, also get a tight quench with some thinner cometic head gaskets. That increase power and does not increase smog to make you fail.
Ok.
The only reason I was going to use the Tick cam is they made it to pass smog.

I see a lot of people going with .040" gaskets. Should I use a similar thickness?
Old 06-19-2013, 01:02 PM
  #34  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bhobbs
Ok.
The only reason I was going to use the Tick cam is they made it to pass smog.

I see a lot of people going with .040" gaskets. Should I use a similar thickness?
You can still go with a Tick Performance cam, just call and discuss it with Martin.

Yes the thinner gaskets will only make you performance better, but it would be a good idea to get the decks milled to insure a perfect seal with the thinner gaskets.

Last edited by 99Bluz28; 06-19-2013 at 01:10 PM.
Old 06-19-2013, 01:07 PM
  #35  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redtan
Stick with the stock rockers and do the trunion upgrade. That will be more then enough for your needs.

Agree no need to go that wide on the exhaust split, a 220/224 would be a nice cam to have and should still pass emissions.

Mill the crap out of the heads to get compression up, also get a tight quench with some thinner cometic head gaskets. That increase power and does not increase smog to make you fail.
He will still need more split than 4*.
Old 06-19-2013, 02:24 PM
  #36  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
bhobbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chino, Ca
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99Bluz28
You can still go with a Tick Performance cam, just call and discuss it with Martin.

Yes the thinner gaskets will only make you performance better, but it would be a good idea to get the decks milled to insure a perfect seal with the thinner gaskets.
I was planning on having the block machined so I would have the block and heads milled.
Old 06-19-2013, 02:26 PM
  #37  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
bhobbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chino, Ca
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99Bluz28
He will still need more split than 4*.
What split do I need?
Old 06-19-2013, 06:07 PM
  #38  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

more then a 4 degree split differance in the intake/exhaust duration timing.could you maybe build a 383 ls1 stroker and use the correct GM head castings ?get the correct legal heads ported .
Old 06-19-2013, 06:29 PM
  #39  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
bhobbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chino, Ca
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by garygnu
more then a 4 degree split differance in the intake/exhaust duration timing.could you maybe build a 383 ls1 stroker and use the correct GM head castings ?get the correct legal heads ported .
I would rather keep it stock cubes.
Old 06-19-2013, 09:42 PM
  #40  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

FYI garygnu, the AFR 210 heads are legal in California.


Quick Reply: Planning CA legal LS1 build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 PM.