Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS2 block can be bored to...?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2013 | 06:08 PM
  #21  
Paul Bell's Avatar
Thread Starter
That's MISTER MODERATOR
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,611
Likes: 61
From: NYC
Default

It appears that a few of you who've been playing with blocks are in here so I'll ask this here:

The LS3/L92 block has a "max stroke" (as per the GMPP catalog) of 4 inches.

The LSA & LS9 blocks have a max stroke of 4.5 inches.

It's my understanding that the LSA & LS9 blocks are a LS3 block with piston squirters and steel main caps. Additionally, the LS9 are also deck plate honed. Are the sleeves also different?

Last edited by Paul Bell; Jun 17, 2013 at 07:06 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2013 | 08:19 PM
  #22  
JakeFusion's Avatar
Super Hulk Smash
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,258
Likes: 146
From: Pace, FL
Default

LSA/9 blocks are also more expensive than LS7 blocks.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2013 | 08:42 PM
  #23  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

LSA and LS9 will not be able to support a 4.5" stroke. Someone fed you some BS.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2013 | 08:51 PM
  #24  
Paul Bell's Avatar
Thread Starter
That's MISTER MODERATOR
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,611
Likes: 61
From: NYC
Default

From the GMPP catalog:
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2013 | 09:15 PM
  #25  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

That's still incorrect. Probably a typo.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2013 | 09:19 PM
  #26  
Paul Bell's Avatar
Thread Starter
That's MISTER MODERATOR
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,611
Likes: 61
From: NYC
Default

OK, that's a possibility.

Can you tell us the sleeve length differences between the LS3 & LS7 blocks?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2013 | 09:31 PM
  #27  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

The sleeves on the LS7 protrude down below the aluminum bore of the block and they're scalloped. The LSA/LS9 sleeves are not like this, they're basically the same as the other aluminum blocks and are much shorter.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2013 | 09:57 PM
  #28  
Paul Bell's Avatar
Thread Starter
That's MISTER MODERATOR
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,611
Likes: 61
From: NYC
Default

Gotcha, thanks for the info. Interesting how the GMPP catalog made that typo in the 2011 and 2012 issues.

There are a good number of vendors offering 4.125 inch stroke engines in the LS3 block so I'm thinking it must be "safe" to do so. TSP, Katech, SLP, and others all offer LS3 based engines with 4.125 stroke cranks.

Last edited by Paul Bell; Jun 17, 2013 at 10:06 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 01:06 AM
  #29  
JakeFusion's Avatar
Super Hulk Smash
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,258
Likes: 146
From: Pace, FL
Default

Like I said, the 4.100" combo is popular because of the pistons with thinner crowns. Wiseco has a line for 4.100" that I think you can get in their K1 setup. With an LS3, that's a 427.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 07:08 AM
  #30  
Paul Bell's Avatar
Thread Starter
That's MISTER MODERATOR
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,611
Likes: 61
From: NYC
Default

Hey Jake, I did see your post above about that. I'm a N/A guy so crown thickness is less of a concern.

I have the Wiseco/K1 catalog, their LS engine strokes are 4.00, 4.125 and 4.25 inches. They don't list a 4.10.

It looks like I'm gonna go with a LS3 block bored to 4.07 with a stroke of 4.125.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 07:12 AM
  #31  
Paul Bell's Avatar
Thread Starter
That's MISTER MODERATOR
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,611
Likes: 61
From: NYC
Default

I made a math error in post 20 (it's corrected now). The rod ratio for a 6.125 rod at 4.125 stroke is 1.48.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 07:29 AM
  #32  
KRAZY K 2000 TA's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 805
Likes: 1
From: Stockton, NY
Default

On my 3rd year running my LS2 at 4.030,doesnt use any oil.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 10:45 AM
  #33  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Bell
Gotcha, thanks for the info. Interesting how the GMPP catalog made that typo in the 2011 and 2012 issues.

There are a good number of vendors offering 4.125 inch stroke engines in the LS3 block so I'm thinking it must be "safe" to do so. TSP, Katech, SLP, and others all offer LS3 based engines with 4.125 stroke cranks.

This is a photo I took of an LSA I built for the last TX Mile. It's a stock stroke crank with forged rods and pistons. You can see how the sleeve is shorter than the bore in the block. The LS7 sleeves protrude down further past the aluminum.



You can also see how the oil squirters don't clear the piston. I bent the squirters away from the pistons, but then they would hit the connecting rod of the opposing cylinder, and that was with the stock stroke.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 02:01 PM
  #34  
Paul Bell's Avatar
Thread Starter
That's MISTER MODERATOR
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,611
Likes: 61
From: NYC
Default

Great pic!
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 02:12 PM
  #35  
JakeFusion's Avatar
Super Hulk Smash
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,258
Likes: 146
From: Pace, FL
Default

http://www.wiseco.com/Catalogs/Automotive/Chevrolet.pdf

K1 4.1" is # 346-4100RB6F
The 4.1" crank is compatible on all the 4.125" stroke pistons per the Wiseco catalog.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2023 | 09:18 PM
  #36  
phrozin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Yes, see when increasing stroke you bring the piston further down in the cylinder which exposes the bottom of the piston out of sleeve further at BDC. This action allows the piston to rock more and eventually can lead to an increase in oil blow by consumption.
One could resleeve with longer sleeves and that helps if one is set on running bigger than 4.00 stoke.
gen4 blocks have longer sleeves for that very reason 6.0-6.2 can take a 4.100 crank I've got a 4.100 stroke 4.00 bore I'm running Manely 6.125 h-beam rods and JE 1.065 CH flat top GEN4 LS 6.0 block and rec port heads
413 ls1 gen 3 can't take a 4.100 crank

Last edited by phrozin; Sep 7, 2023 at 09:32 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2023 | 12:14 AM
  #37  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,285
Likes: 3,613
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by phrozin
gen4 blocks have longer sleeves for that very reason 6.0-6.2 can take a 4.100 crank I've got a 4.100 stroke 4.00 bore I'm running Manely 6.125 h-beam rods and JE 1.065 CH flat top GEN4 LS 6.0 block and rec port heads
413 ls1 gen 3 can't take a 4.100 crank
Predator z hasn't been here for over EIGHT YEARS. Check post dates.....
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2023 | 10:01 PM
  #38  
phrozin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
Predator z hasn't been here for over EIGHT YEARS. Check post dates.....
I tried to delete the post but couldnt, but the info is their for anyone hitting the thread thinking the same, I didn't quote you so why are you posting when it was clearly none of you business
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2023 | 10:39 PM
  #39  
showdog75's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 246
From: Hixson TN
Default

Originally Posted by phrozin
I tried to delete the post but couldnt, but the info is their for anyone hitting the thread thinking the same, I didn't quote you so why are you posting when it was clearly none of you business
lighten up Francis
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2023 | 11:21 PM
  #40  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,285
Likes: 3,613
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by phrozin
I tried to delete the post but couldnt, but the info is their for anyone hitting the thread thinking the same, I didn't quote you so why are you posting when it was clearly none of you business
To delete a post of yours, look in the lower right corner where there will be an "edit" button. Push it and go from there. There will be 2 delete buttons to push.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 PM.