Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LM7 & LQ4 (stock form) engine performance charts @ LOW RPM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2013, 06:45 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ingenio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default LM7 & LQ4 (stock form) engine performance charts @ LOW RPM

Hi guys,

Could you please share with me some engine performance charts for the LM7 & LQ4 engines, that includes performance at LOW RPM ( 1000-4000rpm charted). All the charts I have found are for peak values (high speeds), and most of them are charted from 2500/3000 rpms and up.
The vehicle I'm considering for the swaps spends 99.99999% of its life between 1500 & 2500 rpms. ( Off road crawler vehicle)

I know these Gen III engines are great at high rpms...but wondering what are the specs at "real life driving" rpm's ???.

thanks in avance for the help.

Pedro

Last edited by ingenio; 09-02-2013 at 06:46 PM. Reason: typo found
Old 09-02-2013, 07:05 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

This might help:
LM7; 270-295 hp, and 315-335 tq, depending on model yr ..
LQ4; 300-325 hp, and 360-370 tq, depending on model yr..
Old 09-02-2013, 08:49 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ingenio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Aren't these the peak hp & tq values?

[QUOTE=99Bluz28;17659426]This might help:
LM7; 270-295 hp, and 315-335 tq, depending on model yr ..
LQ4; 300-325 hp, and 360-370 tq, depending on model yr..[/QUOTErque]

Thanks for the post, but I believe you posted the peak values, and these are produced at high rpm (4500 rpm aprox)....

I need to know the torque at 1500/2500 rpms
Old 09-02-2013, 09:24 PM
  #4  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Most people don't dyno that low.
Old 09-02-2013, 09:32 PM
  #5  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
rennat_2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I dont have the numbers but i can tell you from expirence and rock crawling myself(see signature) thst you will want a 6.0l. Like i said i dont have actaul numbers but its obvious with the butt dyno 6.0's pull alot harder sooner than 5.3's which need some rpms and a little higher stall converter.
Old 09-02-2013, 09:56 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
wildcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Western PA
Posts: 2,501
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

It's all about gearing in a crawler rather than engine performance, bt like others said 6.0 is the way To go for most low end torque...
Old 09-03-2013, 06:23 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wildcamaro
It's all about gearing in a crawler rather than engine performance, bt like others said 6.0 is the way To go for most low end torque...
Wrong.

The more power you can make at a lower rpm is where it is rock crawling. You do not want to turn the engine to the moon while moving at a very slow speed. Not only does this increase heat and wear on the engine, but you also need a gear ratio that allows you to crawl, and get wheel speed for mud and heating the tires up on rocks.



Quick Reply: LM7 & LQ4 (stock form) engine performance charts @ LOW RPM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 PM.