To cam or not to cam.
I have a 2000 Trans Am non-ws6 car. Stock 853 heads and internals. 1 3/4 to 3" headers, 3" Y-pipe to the factory over-axle and a Magnaflow muffler and tips.
130k miles, nothing has been changed internally from my knowledge.
I am looking to put either a camshaft in the car, with the beehive springs, or go for the 243 heads, not sure which to do first, and what would net me more horsepower per dollar. I daily drive the car around base, and do not take it to the track. I want a camshaft that would provide good mid range power up to 6000 rpm. I'm not looking to take the car over 6000 because of the age and mileage of the motor. I do not want an extremely high lift, or any other number that would seriously reduce mpg. I can take and expect a drop in gas mileage for the sake of horsepower, but 8 MPG will not do. I want to keep the factory geometry of the heads. When/if I go to the 243's, I wan to try for the same push rod length, same valve size, and replace with factory rockers with another set of stamped steel non-adjustable ones. Basically I'm trying to drop in springs and a cam, or heads then a cam, without much other modification.
Also to note, I do run my own HPTuners programming, so I can tune for camshaft changes.
In summary, Camshaft or heads? What to upgrade with the camshaft? What camshaft for my application?
To answer your question, Yes, Cam the car and don't look back!
EDIT:
I forgot to add I made 358 to the wheels before the cam on a DynoJet
Have you considered stall and gears or just gears if M6?
Where are you finding stamped steel rockers for an LS1? and why would you be looking to replace the existing ones, trunnion upgrade sure, replace not so much unless just buying something a vendor rebuilt with a trunnion upgrade.
Back to the cam, now granted the LS6 has better heads and intake than you have but you have headers so let's call that a peak rpm net wash and ignore all that for the sake of discussion.
A quick googling shows the stock LS6 peaks at 6000rpm and has a factory rev limit of 6600rpm, and that cam is only 204egrees on the intake.
Now think about your low self imposed rpm limit and the absurdity of someone recommending 230degrees. Then another poster posts about a 224 degree cam making good power to 6500rpm backing up the fact 230degrees for 6000rpm limit is absurd.
For a cam to work to full effect you need to rev several hundred rpm past peak so you use the whole top of the hp curve not just the uphill part and to keep the engine in the powerband after the shift.
So basically with a self imposed 6000rpm limit a stock LS6 cam is too big. Hell best I can find the stock LS1 peaks at 5800 and has a 6200rpm rev limit.
So maybe internal engine mods be they heads or cam are NOT for you at this point and you should take this as a good lesson on being careful who you listen to when you ask for ideas.
Have you considered stall and gears or just gears if M6?
Where are you finding stamped steel rockers for an LS1? and why would you be looking to replace the existing ones, trunnion upgrade sure, replace not so much unless just buying something a vendor rebuilt with a trunnion upgrade.
Back to the cam, now granted the LS6 has better heads and intake than you have but you have headers so let's call that a peak rpm net wash and ignore all that for the sake of discussion.
A quick googling shows the stock LS6 peaks at 6000rpm and has a factory rev limit of 6600rpm, and that cam is only 204egrees on the intake.
Now think about your low self imposed rpm limit and the absurdity of someone recommending 230degrees. Then another poster posts about a 224 degree cam making good power to 6500rpm backing up the fact 230degrees for 6000rpm limit is absurd.
For a cam to work to full effect you need to rev several hundred rpm past peak so you use the whole top of the hp curve not just the uphill part and to keep the engine in the powerband after the shift.
So basically with a self imposed 6000rpm limit a stock LS6 cam is too big. Hell best I can find the stock LS1 peaks at 5800 and has a 6200rpm rev limit.
So maybe internal engine mods be they heads or cam are NOT for you at this point and you should take this as a good lesson on being careful who you listen to when you ask for ideas.
I kinda agree with this. OP it's all about how much money you want to spend and your goals. With a small enough cam, you can get away with MOST of your stock supporting mods. If it were me in your shoes I'd say get a cam in the 220degree range. Check out videos of the 224r @ 114 LSA. Makes decent power and drivability is like stock.
Once again, its all about your goals. You don't want to spend money twice, so think ahead of what you will be doing down the road.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Far as "matching stall to cam", stock cars like as much stall as most are willing to drive on the street, get a stall up in the 3400 range and enjoy and don't stress over it too much beyond that.
A 224/224 110lsa+4(4* overlap) would be the largest I'd suggest going with.
Last edited by 99Bluz28; Dec 15, 2013 at 09:55 PM.
IMO, any cam with a IVC of 34 to 38, within the size range of 212/218 up to 224/224 should work good for his intended usage.
Last edited by 99Bluz28; Dec 16, 2013 at 05:09 PM.






