Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

torquer 2 114 lsa question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2014, 08:05 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Gregg79ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: pa
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default torquer 2 114 lsa question

Hi guys, is there much difference in idle lopieness between the 112 and 114 lsa? I would like the 112, but my friend has a slightly used tv2 with a 114lsa he no longer needs I could buy. I just don't want it to sound still kinda stock when ideling, and wish I bought one with the 112 lsa instead. I know I can get his cam for decent price, but debating if I should buy one with the 112 lsa instead. I have listened on youtube the 114 lsa's, some sound aggressive, and some sound not so much, so idk.




02 ss 6spd, longtubes, ory, 3.90 gears, tuned by frost mail order tune, stock heads.
Old 01-20-2014, 08:14 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

sound is some what determined by tune and exhaust system .with a m6 I would prefer a 112lsa ,if you can get a used cam for a good price .measure the lobes for any unusual wear .
Old 01-20-2014, 08:15 AM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

I just don't want it to sound still kinda stock when ideling
A torquer V2 even with 114 LSA will not come even close to sounding like stock at idle.

Not only that, but there are tuning tricks you can do to make a cam sound a lot nastier at idle than before and vice versa.

I can make the baby cam in my 6.0 sound absolutely EVIL or I can have it sound almost stock and would require a knowledgeable gearhead to realize there's an aftermarket cam in there.
Old 01-21-2014, 07:07 AM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Gregg79ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: pa
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, thanks guys for the input, I appreciate it. That is a good point, even with the 114 lsa, its got to be more noticeable compared to the stock camshaft that's in it now, plus tuning will help too. Guess I will go with it. It does check out fine still.
Old 01-23-2014, 11:51 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Stang-Slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atascocita Tx
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a Tqr v2 114lsa. Definitely not anything remotely stock sounding. By all means it doesn't sound like a megadeath cam but it still sounds pretty aggressive in my opinion. I'll see if I can post a video for you tomorrow, if I don't PM me and remind me.

I'm running mine with stock heads and intake, pacesetter longtubes, ORY, and Texas Rumbler exhaust.
Old 01-24-2014, 05:11 PM
  #6  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
rhino200099's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the 112 will give you more power though. ive been playng around with lsa on my desk top dyno program and it usually gets around 25hp more than 114.
Old 01-24-2014, 11:49 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Stang-Slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atascocita Tx
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You really think so? With a tiny little ls1 intake, small pace setter headers and full exhaust I was pulling 370 RWP through a 3800 stalled auto. I did the numbers and I'm pretty sure I will be at 390 with a m6. I don't imagine a Tv2 getting much better than that without a better intake or other bolt ons
Old 01-25-2014, 06:18 AM
  #8  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rhino200099
the 112 will give you more power though. ive been playng around with lsa on my desk top dyno program and it usually gets around 25hp more than 114.
a desk top dyno is about the most inaccurate thing to estimate power. a 2 degree lsa difference is 5-7 hp at best. you wont feel it driving around at all what you will feel is where the powerband comes in but that can be altered with advance in the cam
Old 01-25-2014, 09:42 AM
  #9  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Raxus GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Seeing that a cam is a lot of work and honestly not that expensive, I would just purchase the 112 and have no regrets.
Old 01-25-2014, 10:30 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

OP, another thing to remember is that the 112 LSA will bring in the power sooner than the 114, giving you better low/mid range with still the same top end. For the extra few bucks i'd seriously just get the cam that you really want
Old 01-25-2014, 04:50 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
nascarnate326's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would go with the 112. Otherwise you will wonder "what if" in the back of your mind.
Old 01-25-2014, 05:10 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (29)
 
madmike9396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,375
Received 202 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

111 sounds bad ***
Old 01-25-2014, 05:13 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (29)
 
madmike9396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,375
Received 202 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

here is my brothers on a 111 lsa Jett hot long tubes into a LM1
Old 01-25-2014, 08:26 PM
  #14  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

he 112 will give you more power though. ive been playng around with lsa on my desk top dyno program and it usually gets around 25hp more than 114.
Whut? First of all LSA difference does not give or take away power...it just moves the curve. So while you may notice a power deficiency at a certain point in the curve between the two cams with different LSA, it will most certainly be made up later or earlier in the curve.

Second of all, 25hp is a huge difference. You sure you didn't compare the TV2 114 vs. a megadeath by mistake?
Old 01-26-2014, 10:32 AM
  #15  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Gregg79ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: pa
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys, definatley got a decision to make, I would like my powerband a little lower to come in at, maybe I should pay the extra money and buy a new cam with the 112, I know he would give me a good deal on his slightly used 114 tsv2 cam though. The stock cam is what like 115 or 116ish? the 114 should sound better than stock. hate to got thru the install and not be happy with the idle, there isn't much 114 cams to listen to on youtube I noticed.
Old 01-26-2014, 11:42 AM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
GMC5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Op I'm in the same boat, purchased a new f13 on a 114 lsa for cheap, and I'm wondering about the idle. I was set on keeping it, then i read this damn thread, now you have me wondering again.
Old 01-28-2014, 01:09 AM
  #17  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Stang-Slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atascocita Tx
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here are videos of my Tv2 114lsa with Pacesetters and Texas Rumbler Exhaust


114 LSA TV2 - YouTube


114 LSA TV2 - YouTube

To me it honestly doesn't sound entirely too different. Btw, how did you embed like that?
Old 01-30-2014, 09:47 AM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
GMC5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks for putting those videos up, I'm hoping it will sound good thru a cutout
Old 01-30-2014, 10:14 AM
  #19  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

114 would be better with ported heads milled down for more compression. That would outrun a 112 on stock heads all day and drive better.

The valve events between the two isn't much different. Maybe 200 RPM peak difference. You have a later intake valve closing point with the 114 that would love more compression. Actually the cam is big enough that it'll run better with 11:1 in either configuration.
Old 01-30-2014, 10:58 AM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
99wssixm6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Winter Park FL.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion™
114 would be better with ported heads milled down for more compression. That would outrun a 112 on stock heads all day and drive better.

The valve events between the two isn't much different. Maybe 200 RPM peak difference. You have a later intake valve closing point with the 114 that would love more compression. Actually the cam is big enough that it'll run better with 11:1 in either configuration.
This is good info and something to think about, if you are planning on getting heads in the future consider the cam spec now and if you will have to buy a new one.

I bought a used cam, and loved it. One thing about reading too much is that you start to get engrossed with what if's. What if there wasnt a 112 version, you would think the 114 sounds bad *** and be all for it. I say get the 114 if it fits your build requirements and spend the extra money on GOOD valve springs....such as the Brian Tooley daul spring kit.


Quick Reply: torquer 2 114 lsa question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.