Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LQ4 w/140k miles--better to put LS2 rotating assembly or 243 heads?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2014, 01:42 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Goldhawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dayton Ohio
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default LQ4 w/140k miles--better to put LS2 rotating assembly or 243 heads?

I have an option on a 140k mile 2001 LQ4. Was thinking of either upgrading to 243 heads to raise the compression, or to buy a used 16k mile LS2 rotating assembly (w/24T reluctor). Thoughts on either approach? I'm trying to build a nice motor on a budget. Is there a used cam I ought to look for while I'm at it w/either option? One that will make lower end torque, not high rpm.

Thx
Old 03-08-2014, 02:00 AM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
fubar569's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bradford, PA
Posts: 258
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Even a set of 241's with a .040 gasket should get your compression with stock LQ4 pistons somewhere around 10.3 or 10.4:1 depending on exact chamber size and exactly how far out of the hole the pistons are (usually stock LQ4's are +.005 out of the hole). 243's would raise that to somewhere around 10.7ish IIRC.

If the cylinder walls look good and piston to wall clearance is good i would get a new set of rings & bearings and toss it back together with a mild cam and a set of budget heads. a cam that might seem a bit aggressive for a street 5.7 won't be as high strung in a 6.0+ liter so you'll be able to get a decent cam in there...

My combo is shaping up to look like this:

370cid LQ4
TEA CNC'd 241's with Lunati springs shimmed to spec for cam
Martin @ Tick Custom Cam
Pacesetter LT's & O/R Y to SLP Catback
LS6 Intake
85mm MAF & TB
Powerbond 25% UDP
and blah blah little stuff

I was hoping to be in the ballpark of ~450whp on a stock cube LS1. Martin seems to think the 370cid will bring the power about 100-200rpm lower with the possibility for just as much peak or maybe a hair more...with a nice line down low to boot...

On a stock cube LS1 you'll have spent about 3k to replicate my build. I paid $450 for my .030 over LQ4 as a starting point and i'm not sure what all the machine work will cost yet. i figure for 370cid i'll be under 4k still.
Old 03-08-2014, 10:17 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Goldhawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dayton Ohio
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Any thoughts on the LS2 rotating assembly?
Old 03-08-2014, 12:10 PM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
fubar569's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bradford, PA
Posts: 258
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

no point if your current motor's specifications are within service limits. it's the same bore, same stroke. would you rather tear the motor down to toss in a STOCK rotating assembly from a LS2 just to bump compression or just toss on a set of heads and be done?

I know you're gonna be inside the motor anyways...but i'd rather put my money into the top end all things being equal...you will get much more of a return for that investment...
Old 03-08-2014, 12:23 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Goldhawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dayton Ohio
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fubar569
no point if your current motor's specifications are within service limits. it's the same bore, same stroke. would you rather tear the motor down to toss in a STOCK rotating assembly from a LS2 just to bump compression or just toss on a set of heads and be done?

I know you're gonna be inside the motor anyways...but i'd rather put my money into the top end all things being equal...you will get much more of a return for that investment...

I'm starting to lean to do both. I'm also thinking that maybe w/140k I wouldn't need a rebore, but a good honing and new rings, plus new bearings and LS2 timing chain I would be in pretty good shape. That would get me compression, better pistons/rods and better heads. Is the timing cover the same on LS2 cranks as w/LQ4?
Old 03-09-2014, 06:03 PM
  #6  
Launching!
 
kj598bbc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CHICAGO IL.
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Is the junkyard 6.0 that had a little water in it still in service ?
Old 03-09-2014, 07:57 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Goldhawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dayton Ohio
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kj598bbc
Is the junkyard 6.0 that had a little water in it still in service ?
You betcha--doing very well. But I'm looking for a 6.0 for my 99 tahoe. I just swapped to the 0411 pcm, dyno tuned and have 228 RWHP. Thinking how nice 350+ RWHP would be.



Quick Reply: LQ4 w/140k miles--better to put LS2 rotating assembly or 243 heads?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 PM.